Work Samples for AI Chatbot Interaction Designers

Designing effective AI chatbot interactions is a nuanced skill that blends understanding user needs, conversational flow, technical constraints, and brand voice. Unlike traditional software interfaces, chatbot interactions are dynamic and rely heavily on natural language processing, making the design process less about static screens and more about anticipating conversational paths and user intent. Evaluating a candidate's ability in this domain requires more than just reviewing resumes or asking theoretical questions. You need to see how they think and design in a practical context.

Work samples, role plays, and technical skill evaluations are indispensable tools for assessing candidates in AI Chatbot Interaction Design. They move beyond self-reported skills and allow hiring teams to observe a candidate's actual capabilities in simulating real-world design challenges. Can they structure a clear, intuitive conversation? How do they handle ambiguity or unexpected user input? Can they translate complex requirements into simple, effective dialogue? These are questions best answered by observing a candidate in action.

For a role as critical as AI Chatbot Interaction Designer, where a poorly designed interaction can lead to user frustration, abandonment, and damage to your brand, the investment in rigorous evaluation is paramount. Hiring the wrong person can result in significant rework, missed opportunities, and a poor user experience that is difficult to recover from. Conversely, hiring a top-tier designer can elevate your product, improve user satisfaction, and drive key business outcomes.

The exercises provided here are designed to give candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their practical skills in AI Chatbot Interaction Design. They cover key areas such as core conversation flow, error handling, evaluation, and strategic planning. By using these structured activities, you can ensure consistency across candidates, gather objective data points, and make more informed hiring decisions, ultimately leading to a stronger, more effective team.

Activity #1: Designing a Core Conversation Flow

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to design a clear, efficient, and user-friendly conversation flow for a common chatbot use case. It requires them to think through the steps a user would take, anticipate potential variations in user input, and structure the bot's responses logically and helpfully. This demonstrates their foundational understanding of conversational design principles and their ability to translate requirements into a practical interaction.

Directions for the Company: Provide the candidate with a specific, common use case for a chatbot relevant to your industry or product (e.g., "Help a user reset their password," "Allow a user to check their order status," "Guide a user through booking a meeting"). Give them a brief description of the target user persona and the desired outcome. Provide a simple template or tool they can use to map out the conversation flow (e.g., a simple text-based format, a flowchart tool like Miro or Lucidchart if available, or even just pen and paper).

Resources for the Company:

• Written prompt detailing the specific use case, target user, and desired outcome.
• (Optional) Access to a simple flowcharting tool or a template for mapping the flow.
• (Optional) Examples of existing chatbot interactions (good or bad) for context.

Best Practices/Tips:

• Choose a use case that is representative of the complexity the candidate will face in the role but not overly complex for the time allotted.
• Be available for clarifying questions, but avoid giving direct design guidance.
• Observe their process and how they approach structuring the conversation.

Directions for the Candidate: You will be given a specific use case for a chatbot. Your task is to design the core conversation flow that guides a user from initiating the request to successfully completing the task. Map out the steps the user and the bot will take, including potential variations in user phrasing for key steps. Focus on creating a clear, intuitive, and efficient path for the user. You can use the provided template or tool to visualize your flow.

Materials/Information Needed:

• The written prompt describing the use case.
• Access to the provided template or tool for mapping the flow.

Goal:The main goal is to demonstrate your ability to design a logical and user-centered conversation flow that effectively achieves the user's objective for the given use case.

Feedback Mechanism: After presenting their design, the interviewer will provide one piece of specific positive feedback on an aspect of the conversation flow (e.g., "I liked how you handled the confirmation step"). The interviewer will then provide one suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might make the initial prompt clearer for users who aren't familiar with the process"). The candidate will then have 5-10 minutes to verbally describe how they would adjust their design based on the feedback.

Activity #2: Handling Edge Cases and Error States

This activity tests a candidate's foresight and problem-solving skills in anticipating and gracefully handling situations where the conversation deviates from the ideal path. This includes misunderstood input, requests outside the bot's capabilities, or system errors. Designing for these scenarios is crucial for preventing user frustration and maintaining a positive experience.

Directions for the Company: Building on the use case from Activity #1 (or a different, related one), present the candidate with 2-3 specific edge cases or error scenarios that could occur during the conversation flow (e.g., "The user types something completely irrelevant," "The system needed to fulfill the request is temporarily unavailable," "The user provides ambiguous information"). Ask the candidate to design how the chatbot would respond in each of these specific situations.

Resources for the Company:

• Written descriptions of 2-3 specific edge cases or error scenarios.
• (Optional) Context from the conversation flow designed in Activity #1.

Best Practices/Tips:

• Choose realistic edge cases that frequently occur in chatbot interactions.
• Look for responses that are helpful, empathetic, and guide the user back to a productive path or offer alternatives.
• Assess their ability to explain why they chose a particular response for each scenario.

Directions for the Candidate: Given the context of a chatbot conversation (potentially the one you designed in Activity #1), you will be presented with 2-3 specific situations where the conversation goes off the expected path (edge cases or errors). For each situation, design the chatbot's response(s) to handle it effectively. Your goal is to prevent user frustration, provide helpful information, and guide the user towards a resolution or alternative.

Materials/Information Needed:

• Written descriptions of the edge case/error scenarios.
• (Optional) Context of the core conversation flow.

Goal: Demonstrate your ability to anticipate potential problems in a conversation and design robust, user-friendly responses for non-ideal scenarios.

Feedback Mechanism: After presenting their solutions for the edge cases, the interviewer will provide one piece of specific positive feedback on their approach to one scenario (e.g., "Your handling of the irrelevant input was clear and helpful"). The interviewer will then provide one suggestion for improvement on another scenario (e.g., "For the system error, consider offering a specific alternative action the user can take"). The candidate will then have 5-10 minutes to verbally describe how they would adjust their response design based on the feedback.

Activity #3: Evaluating and Improving an Existing Interaction

This activity assesses a candidate's critical thinking, analytical skills, and ability to identify areas for improvement in existing chatbot interactions. It requires them to put themselves in the user's shoes, identify points of friction or confusion, and propose concrete, actionable solutions.

Directions for the Company: Provide the candidate with a transcript or recording of a real or simulated chatbot interaction that has clear areas for improvement (e.g., the bot misunderstood the user, the response was unhelpful, the flow was confusing). Ask the candidate to analyze the interaction, identify the problems, and propose specific changes to the bot's design or responses to make it better.

Resources for the Company:

• A transcript or recording of a chatbot interaction with identifiable issues.
• (Optional) The original design intent or goal of the interaction.

Best Practices/Tips:

• Choose an interaction that is complex enough to have multiple potential points of failure but not so complex that analysis is impossible within the time frame.
• Look for candidates who can articulate why something is a problem from a user perspective and propose specific, feasible solutions.
• Encourage them to think about both the bot's responses and the overall flow.

Directions for the Candidate: You will be provided with a transcript or recording of a chatbot interaction. Your task is to analyze this interaction from a user experience perspective. Identify the points where the interaction is confusing, unhelpful, or breaks down. For each identified problem, explain why it's an issue and propose specific, actionable changes to the chatbot's design or responses to improve the interaction.

Materials/Information Needed:

• The transcript or recording of the chatbot interaction.

Goal:Demonstrate your ability to critically evaluate existing chatbot interactions, diagnose usability issues, and propose concrete design improvements.

Feedback Mechanism: After presenting their analysis and proposed improvements, the interviewer will provide one piece of specific positive feedback on their evaluation (e.g., "Your identification of the ambiguity in step 3 was spot on"). The interviewer will then provide one suggestion for improvement regarding their proposed solutions (e.g., "For the unhelpful response, consider if there's a way to offer more context or alternative options"). The candidate will then have 5-10 minutes to verbally describe how they would refine their proposed solutions based on the feedback.

Activity #4: Planning a Complex Chatbot Feature

This activity evaluates a candidate's strategic thinking, planning, and ability to break down a larger design challenge into manageable steps. Designing complex chatbot features involves more than just writing dialogue; it requires considering data requirements, integrations, user testing, and iteration.

Directions for the Company: Present the candidate with a description of a more complex chatbot feature or capability you might want to build (e.g., "Design a chatbot flow that allows users to compare two products," "Plan the design process for adding a personalized recommendation engine to the chatbot"). Ask the candidate to outline the key steps they would take to design this feature, including considerations beyond just the conversation flow (e.g., data needed, potential technical dependencies, how they would test it).

Resources for the Company:

• Written description of the complex chatbot feature.
• (Optional) High-level information about your existing tech stack or data availability.

Best Practices/Tips:

• Choose a feature that is genuinely complex and requires thoughtful planning.
• Look for candidates who consider the end-to-end process, not just the user-facing dialogue.
• Assess their ability to prioritize, identify potential roadblocks, and think about how to validate their design.

Directions for the Candidate: You will be given a description of a complex chatbot feature or capability. Your task is to outline the key steps you would take to design and prepare this feature for implementation. Think beyond just the conversation script – consider what information you would need, who you would need to collaborate with (e.g., engineers, product managers), how you would test your design, and what success would look like. Present your plan as a series of logical steps.

Materials/Information Needed:

• Written description of the complex feature.

Goal: Demonstrate your ability to strategically plan the design process for a complex chatbot feature, considering technical, data, and collaborative aspects in addition to the conversational flow.

Feedback Mechanism: After presenting their plan, the interviewer will provide one piece of specific positive feedback on an aspect of their planning process (e.g., "Your inclusion of user testing early in the process is a great practice"). The interviewer will then provide one suggestion for improvement regarding their plan (e.g., "Consider adding a step for defining key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the feature's success"). The candidate will then have 5-10 minutes to verbally describe how they would adjust or add to their plan based on the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How much time should we allocate for each activity?

A: The time needed will vary depending on the complexity of the scenario and the candidate's experience level. As a general guideline, allocate 30-45 minutes for the candidate to complete the activity (designing the flow, analyzing the transcript, outlining the plan) and then 15-20 minutes for presentation and feedback for each. You might combine activities or spread them across multiple interview rounds.

Q: Should candidates complete these activities live or as a take-home assignment?

A: Both approaches have merit. Live exercises allow you to observe the candidate's process and ask clarifying questions in real-time, which is excellent for assessing their thinking under pressure and communication skills. Take-home assignments allow candidates more time to polish their work and can be better for evaluating the quality of their final output. For AI Chatbot Interaction Design, a combination might be best – perhaps a take-home design exercise followed by a live session where they walk you through their work and tackle an edge case scenario live.

Q: How do we ensure consistency if different interviewers are conducting these activities?

A: Provide interviewers with clear guidelines for each activity, including the specific prompts, resources, and what to look for in a strong response. Using a standardized scorecard tied to the skills being evaluated in each activity is also crucial for consistent assessment. Training interviewers on how to conduct the activities and provide feedback is also highly recommended.

Q: Can we modify these activities to fit our specific needs?

A: Absolutely. These are examples. You should tailor the specific use cases, edge cases, transcripts, and complex features to be highly relevant to the actual work the candidate will be doing at your company. The structure of the activities (description, directions, feedback) is designed to be adaptable.

Q: How do we evaluate the "Feedback Mechanism" part?

A: The feedback mechanism is designed to assess coachability and the ability to iterate quickly. Evaluate how the candidate receives feedback (Are they defensive? Do they ask clarifying questions?) and how they incorporate it into their revised approach (Do they understand the suggestion? Is their proposed adjustment logical and effective?).

Q: What if a candidate struggles significantly with an activity?

A: This is valuable data. It might indicate a gap in their skills or experience in that specific area. Note where they struggled and explore it further in subsequent interview stages or use it to inform your overall assessment. Remember that the goal is to gather information to make the best hiring decision, not just to see if they can complete the task perfectly.

Hiring the best AI Chatbot Interaction Designers requires moving beyond traditional interview methods and incorporating practical, job-relevant evaluations. By using structured work samples and role plays like the ones outlined here, you gain invaluable insight into a candidate's real-world skills, critical thinking, and ability to handle the complexities of conversational design. This rigorous approach, combined with objective data, empowers you to make confident hiring decisions that will lead to building exceptional products. Yardstick's AI-powered tools can further enhance this process, from defining clear job requirements with AI Job Descriptions to generating targeted AI Interview Questions and building comprehensive AI Interview Guides tailored to roles like AI Chatbot Interaction Designer.

Build a full interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account: https://yardstick.team/sign-up