Practical Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Identity and Access Management Specialists

In today's digital landscape, Identity and Access Management (IAM) has become a cornerstone of organizational security. As cyber threats evolve and regulatory requirements tighten, companies need skilled IAM specialists who can not only implement technical solutions but also balance security with usability. The right IAM specialist can significantly reduce security risks, improve compliance posture, and enhance operational efficiency.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field. While candidates may articulate IAM concepts well in conversation, their ability to apply these concepts in real-world scenarios is what truly matters. This is where practical work samples become invaluable in the hiring process.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach IAM challenges, their technical proficiency with relevant tools, and their ability to communicate complex security concepts to various stakeholders. By observing candidates in action, hiring managers can assess not just what they know, but how they apply that knowledge to solve problems.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate candidates across the full spectrum of IAM responsibilities—from technical implementation to policy development, incident response, and stakeholder management. Each exercise simulates real-world scenarios that IAM specialists encounter regularly, providing a comprehensive assessment of a candidate's readiness for the role.

Activity #1: User Access Review and Remediation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify inappropriate access rights and implement the principle of least privilege—a fundamental aspect of IAM. It tests their analytical skills, knowledge of access control best practices, and ability to translate findings into actionable recommendations.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a mock user access report from an identity management system showing 15-20 users with their roles, group memberships, and resource access rights. Include several clear violations of least privilege principles (e.g., developers with admin access, terminated employees with active accounts, excessive permissions).
• Provide a basic organizational chart showing departments and reporting structures.
• Include a simple document outlining the company's access control policies.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer available to answer clarifying questions about the environment.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided user access report and identify potential security issues or policy violations.
• Document at least five specific access control problems you've identified.
• For each problem, recommend appropriate remediation steps.
• Prepare a brief explanation of how you would implement automated controls to prevent similar issues in the future.
• Be prepared to discuss your findings and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, the interviewer should provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., thoroughness of analysis, practical recommendations) and one area for improvement (e.g., missed critical violations, impractical solutions).
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise one of their recommendations based on the feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised solution.

Activity #2: IAM Security Incident Response

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to analyze security logs, identify potential breaches, and respond appropriately—critical skills for protecting organizational assets. It evaluates technical knowledge, analytical thinking, and decision-making under pressure.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario involving suspicious authentication activities in your identity management system.
• Prepare a set of mock logs showing unusual login patterns (e.g., multiple failed login attempts, access from unusual locations, login attempts outside business hours, privilege escalation).
• Include relevant system information such as network architecture diagrams and security policies.
• Allow 45 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a security team member available to provide additional context if needed.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided logs and identify potential security incidents.
• Document your analysis process and findings.
• Develop an immediate response plan to address the identified issues.
• Outline longer-term recommendations to prevent similar incidents.
• Create a brief incident report suitable for sharing with IT leadership.
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning and defend your recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the candidate's analytical approach and the completeness of their response plan.
• Highlight one strength in their analysis and one area where their incident response could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to refine their immediate response plan based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to adapt their approach while maintaining security best practices.

Activity #3: IAM Policy Development and Implementation Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop practical IAM policies and implementation plans that balance security requirements with business needs. It tests their knowledge of IAM frameworks, regulatory requirements, and change management principles.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where the organization needs to implement a new access management policy for a specific system or application (e.g., implementing multi-factor authentication for all privileged accounts).
• Provide context about the organization's structure, current IAM environment, and business constraints.
• Include information about relevant compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, SOX).
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have someone familiar with the organization's compliance requirements available for questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a draft IAM policy addressing the specified requirement.
• Create a high-level implementation plan including:
• Technical requirements and solutions
• Timeline and key milestones
• Required resources
• Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
• Success metrics
• Outline a communication and training approach for affected users.
• Be prepared to present and discuss your policy and implementation plan.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the policy's completeness and the practicality of the implementation plan.
• Highlight one strength (e.g., thorough risk assessment) and one area for improvement (e.g., overlooked stakeholder impacts).
• Ask the candidate to revise one section of their implementation plan based on the feedback.
• Assess their ability to incorporate business considerations while maintaining security objectives.

Activity #4: IAM Solution Architecture and Integration

This exercise tests a candidate's technical knowledge of IAM systems and their ability to design solutions that integrate with existing infrastructure. It evaluates their understanding of IAM technologies, architecture principles, and system integration challenges.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario requiring the design of an IAM solution for a specific business need (e.g., implementing single sign-on across multiple applications, integrating a new cloud service with existing identity infrastructure).
• Provide information about the current technology environment, including existing identity systems, applications, and infrastructure.
• Include business requirements and constraints (e.g., budget limitations, timeline, compliance requirements).
• Allow 60-75 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical architect available to answer questions about the current environment.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a high-level architecture for the IAM solution that meets the business requirements.
• Create a diagram showing how your solution integrates with existing systems.
• Document key technical components and their functions.
• Explain your technology choices and any trade-offs you considered.
• Identify potential technical challenges and how you would address them.
• Be prepared to present and defend your solution design.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the technical soundness of the solution and its alignment with business requirements.
• Highlight one strength of the design and one area that could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to revise one aspect of their solution based on the feedback (e.g., addressing a security vulnerability, improving scalability).
• Evaluate their technical knowledge and ability to adapt their design to meet specific requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-75 minutes, depending on the complexity. We recommend scheduling at least 90 minutes for each exercise to allow time for setup, the exercise itself, feedback, and discussion. If time constraints are a concern, select the 1-2 exercises most relevant to your specific IAM needs.

Should we use our actual systems and data for these exercises?

No, always use mock data and systems for these exercises. Create realistic but fictional scenarios that resemble your environment without exposing sensitive information. This protects your organization while still providing a relevant assessment context.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different IAM tools than those in our environment?

Focus on evaluating the candidate's approach, reasoning, and fundamental IAM knowledge rather than specific tool expertise. A strong IAM specialist with experience in different tools can typically adapt to your environment. During the exercise, make clear which specific technologies are essential versus those where general knowledge is sufficient.

What if a candidate proposes a solution that's different from our current approach?

This can actually be valuable! Different approaches might highlight improvements you haven't considered. Evaluate whether their solution is sound from security and implementation perspectives, even if it differs from your current methods. The key is whether they can justify their approach with solid reasoning.

Should we provide feedback during the actual hiring process?

Yes, providing real-time feedback during work samples serves two purposes: it assesses the candidate's ability to receive and incorporate feedback (a critical skill for IAM specialists), and it improves the candidate experience by making the process more interactive and educational.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Design exercises that focus on fundamental IAM principles rather than specific vendor implementations. Provide clear context and background information so candidates aren't disadvantaged if they haven't worked in your specific industry. Ensure the scenarios are accessible to people with diverse experiences while still testing the core skills needed for the role.

Hiring the right IAM specialist is crucial for maintaining your organization's security posture and enabling business operations. These work samples will help you identify candidates who not only understand IAM concepts but can apply them effectively in real-world scenarios. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI job description generator, AI interview question generator, and AI interview guide generator. You can also find more information about Identity and Access Management Specialist roles at our job description page.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for your IAM Specialist role? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!