Essential Work Samples for Evaluating LLM Evaluation Framework Design Skills

Designing effective evaluation frameworks for Large Language Models (LLMs) has become a critical skill as organizations increasingly rely on these powerful AI systems. A robust evaluation framework ensures that LLMs perform reliably, safely, and effectively across diverse use cases while identifying potential limitations and risks. However, assessing a candidate's ability to design such frameworks requires more than just theoretical knowledge—it demands practical demonstration of skills.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in LLM evaluation framework design. While candidates may articulate evaluation principles well during discussions, the ability to systematically design, implement, and refine evaluation methodologies requires hands-on experience and strategic thinking that only becomes apparent through practical exercises.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach complex LLM evaluation challenges, revealing their technical depth, methodological rigor, and attention to critical dimensions like fairness, safety, and performance. These exercises demonstrate whether candidates can translate theoretical knowledge into actionable evaluation strategies that address real-world concerns about LLM deployment.

The following work samples are designed to assess a candidate's proficiency in LLM evaluation framework design across multiple dimensions: comprehensive framework planning, metrics implementation, bias assessment, and comparative analysis. Each exercise simulates realistic scenarios that LLM evaluation specialists encounter, providing valuable insights into a candidate's problem-solving approach, technical expertise, and ability to design evaluation systems that drive responsible AI development.

Activity #1: Comprehensive LLM Evaluation Framework Design

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design a holistic evaluation framework for LLMs, demonstrating their understanding of the multifaceted nature of LLM performance. Candidates must consider various evaluation dimensions, appropriate metrics, testing methodologies, and implementation strategies. This activity reveals the candidate's strategic thinking, domain knowledge, and ability to create structured approaches to complex evaluation challenges.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a scenario describing a specific LLM use case (e.g., customer service assistant, content generation tool, or research assistant).
• Include key business requirements, potential risks, and target user demographics.
• Supply documentation about the LLM's architecture, training data characteristics, and intended deployment environment.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the framework design.
• Have a technical evaluator familiar with LLM evaluation methodologies review the submission.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive evaluation framework for the specified LLM use case.
• Your framework should include:
• Key evaluation dimensions (e.g., accuracy, safety, fairness, robustness)
• Specific metrics for each dimension
• Testing methodologies (automated, human evaluation, etc.)
• Data requirements for evaluation
• Implementation plan and resource requirements
• Create a visual representation of your framework (diagram or flowchart)
• Explain how your framework addresses the specific risks and requirements outlined in the scenario
• Identify potential limitations of your approach and how they might be addressed

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on one strength of the framework design (e.g., comprehensiveness, practicality, or innovative approach).
• The interviewer should also identify one area for improvement (e.g., missing evaluation dimensions, implementation challenges, or metric selection).
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area identified.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised framework.

Activity #2: Evaluation Metrics Implementation

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to move from theoretical framework design to practical implementation of evaluation metrics. It assesses technical skills in defining, implementing, and interpreting metrics that provide meaningful insights into LLM performance. This activity reveals the candidate's technical depth, attention to detail, and ability to translate evaluation concepts into actionable measurements.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide sample LLM outputs for a specific task (e.g., summarization, question answering, or content generation).
• Include ground truth or reference outputs where applicable.
• Supply a basic evaluation framework outline with 3-4 key dimensions that need metrics.
• Prepare a computing environment or code template where candidates can implement their metrics.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided LLM outputs and evaluation framework outline.
• For each evaluation dimension, define 2-3 specific metrics that would effectively measure performance.
• Implement at least one metric for each dimension using the provided code template or environment.
• For each implemented metric:
• Explain the calculation methodology
• Apply it to the sample outputs
• Interpret the results and what they indicate about LLM performance
• Discuss limitations of the metric and potential complementary measures
• Recommend thresholds or benchmarks for acceptable performance on each metric.
• Explain how these metrics would be integrated into a continuous evaluation pipeline.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one metric implementation that was particularly well-designed or insightful.
• The interviewer should identify one metric that could be improved in terms of implementation, interpretation, or relevance.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to refine the identified metric based on feedback.
• Assess the candidate's technical understanding of metric design and their ability to adapt their approach based on feedback.

Activity #3: Bias and Fairness Assessment Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design evaluation methodologies specifically focused on identifying and measuring bias and fairness issues in LLMs. It tests their understanding of responsible AI principles, awareness of various types of bias, and ability to create systematic approaches to detecting potential fairness concerns. This activity reveals the candidate's ethical awareness, methodological rigor, and commitment to responsible LLM deployment.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a description of an LLM that will be deployed in a sensitive domain (e.g., healthcare, hiring, financial services).
• Include information about the training data demographics and potential sensitive attributes.
• Supply sample prompts and outputs that might reveal bias concerns.
• Prepare documentation on organizational fairness standards or requirements.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive bias and fairness assessment methodology for the described LLM.
• Your assessment plan should include:
• Identification of potential bias types and fairness concerns relevant to the use case
• Test dataset design specifications (including demographic representation)
• Specific prompts or scenarios designed to detect different types of bias
• Quantitative metrics for measuring bias and fairness
• Qualitative evaluation approaches to complement quantitative measures
• Mitigation strategies for identified issues
• Apply your methodology to analyze the provided sample outputs for potential bias.
• Recommend thresholds for acceptable performance and escalation procedures for serious issues.
• Discuss how this assessment would integrate with the broader evaluation framework.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should commend one aspect of the bias assessment methodology that demonstrates particular insight or thoroughness.
• The interviewer should identify one area where the methodology could be strengthened or expanded.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to enhance their approach based on the feedback.
• Evaluate the candidate's understanding of fairness concepts and their ability to design practical evaluation approaches for detecting subtle bias issues.

Activity #4: Comparative Benchmark Analysis

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design and implement comparative evaluations between different LLMs or versions of the same LLM. It tests their understanding of benchmarking methodologies, statistical analysis, and ability to derive meaningful insights from comparative data. This activity reveals the candidate's analytical skills, attention to experimental design, and ability to make data-driven recommendations about LLM selection or improvement.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide performance data from 2-3 different LLMs or versions on a set of tasks.
• Include information about each model's architecture, size, and training approach.
• Supply a business context that requires selecting the best model or identifying improvement areas.
• Prepare visualization tools or templates for the candidate to use.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive benchmark analysis to compare the provided LLMs.
• Your analysis should include:
• Selection of appropriate comparison metrics across multiple dimensions
• Statistical methods for determining significant performance differences
• Visualization approaches to clearly communicate comparative results
• Weighting methodology to prioritize metrics based on business requirements
• Identification of performance patterns across different task types or data categories
• Implement your analysis on the provided performance data.
• Create at least two different visualizations that effectively communicate key comparative insights.
• Provide a data-driven recommendation about which model performs best for the specified use case.
• Identify specific areas where each model could be improved based on the comparative analysis.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one aspect of the comparative analysis that was particularly effective or insightful.
• The interviewer should suggest one way the analysis could be enhanced or made more rigorous.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to refine their analysis based on the feedback.
• Assess the candidate's analytical thinking, ability to derive meaningful insights from complex data, and skill in communicating technical findings clearly.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical knowledge of LLMs should candidates have for these exercises?

Candidates should have a solid understanding of LLM architectures, capabilities, and limitations, but the focus is on evaluation methodology rather than model development. They should be familiar with common evaluation metrics, testing approaches, and responsible AI principles. The exercises can be adapted based on the technical depth required for your specific role.

Should we provide real LLM outputs or create synthetic examples?

Either approach can work, but using real outputs often provides a more authentic assessment. If using real outputs, ensure they don't contain sensitive information. For synthetic examples, make sure they include realistic challenges and edge cases that would test the candidate's evaluation skills. Consider creating a mix of straightforward and challenging examples.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose novel evaluation approaches?

Novel approaches should be encouraged and evaluated based on their soundness, practicality, and alignment with evaluation goals. The key is whether the approach would effectively measure relevant aspects of LLM performance, not whether it follows conventional methods. Ask candidates to explain the rationale behind novel approaches and consider their potential advantages over traditional methods.

What if candidates don't have experience with specific evaluation metrics mentioned in the exercises?

Focus on the candidate's overall approach to evaluation rather than knowledge of specific metrics. Strong candidates may propose alternative metrics that serve similar purposes. The exercises test framework design thinking more than familiarity with particular metrics. Consider providing reference materials about common metrics if you want to assess implementation skills specifically.

How can we adapt these exercises for remote interviews?

These exercises work well in remote settings using collaborative tools like Google Docs, Miro, or code sharing platforms. For implementation exercises, consider using cloud-based notebooks or providing access to a development environment. Allow screen sharing for presentations and discussions. Ensure candidates have access to necessary resources before the interview begins.

Should we expect candidates to complete all aspects of these exercises in the allotted time?

The exercises are intentionally comprehensive to observe how candidates prioritize under time constraints. Strong candidates will focus on the most critical aspects first and acknowledge areas they would explore further with more time. Evaluate the quality and thoughtfulness of what they complete rather than expecting exhaustive solutions to every component.

LLM evaluation framework design is a rapidly evolving field that requires both technical expertise and strategic thinking. By using these work samples, you can identify candidates who not only understand evaluation principles but can apply them effectively to real-world challenges. The best candidates will demonstrate a balanced approach that considers technical performance alongside responsible AI considerations like fairness, safety, and transparency.

At Yardstick, we're committed to helping organizations build effective evaluation processes for all roles, including specialized technical positions like LLM evaluation specialists. Our AI-powered tools can help you create customized job descriptions, targeted interview questions, and comprehensive interview guides that identify the most qualified candidates for your specific needs.

Want to build a complete interview guide for LLM Evaluation Framework Design? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!