Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI Model Performance Monitoring Skills

AI model performance monitoring is a critical skill in the machine learning lifecycle that ensures deployed models continue to perform as expected in production environments. As AI systems become more integrated into business operations, the ability to effectively monitor, diagnose, and address performance issues becomes increasingly valuable. Organizations that excel at model monitoring can prevent costly failures, maintain compliance, and ensure their AI systems deliver consistent value.

Evaluating a candidate's proficiency in AI model performance monitoring through theoretical questions alone is insufficient. The complexity of monitoring systems, the nuanced understanding of various metrics, and the ability to troubleshoot real-world issues require hands-on assessment. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach monitoring challenges, their technical depth, and their ability to communicate findings effectively.

The exercises outlined below simulate real-world scenarios that AI engineers and ML practitioners face when monitoring model performance. They test not only technical knowledge but also critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills. By observing how candidates navigate these challenges, hiring managers can make more informed decisions about a candidate's readiness for the role.

Implementing these work samples as part of your interview process will help identify candidates who not only understand monitoring concepts theoretically but can apply them practically. This distinction is crucial, as effective model monitoring requires both depth of knowledge and practical implementation skills that can only be demonstrated through hands-on exercises.

Activity #1: Monitoring Dashboard Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design comprehensive monitoring systems for AI models. Effective monitoring requires thoughtful selection of metrics, understanding of thresholds, and creation of visualizations that make complex performance data interpretable. This skill is fundamental for maintaining model health and enabling quick responses to degradation.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with documentation about a fictional machine learning model (e.g., a customer churn prediction model) including its purpose, input features, output format, and current deployment environment.
• Include information about the business impact of the model and what stakeholders care about.
• Prepare a template or tool where the candidate can sketch or mock up their dashboard design (this could be as simple as a whiteboard, or digital tools like Figma, Google Slides, or even paper).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member familiar with ML monitoring evaluate the solution.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a monitoring dashboard for the provided model that would help detect and diagnose performance issues.
• Specify which metrics you would track and why (technical metrics like AUC, precision/recall, as well as business metrics).
• Indicate what thresholds or alerting mechanisms you would implement.
• Explain how you would monitor for data drift and model drift.
• Create a mock-up or sketch of how the dashboard would look, including the most important visualizations.
• Be prepared to explain your design choices and how this dashboard would help maintain model performance.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the comprehensiveness of the metrics chosen, the practicality of the implementation, and the clarity of the visualizations.
• For improvement feedback, suggest one area where the monitoring could be enhanced (e.g., adding a specific type of drift detection or business metric).
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their design based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area identified.

Activity #2: Performance Degradation Root Cause Analysis

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to diagnose the root causes of model performance degradation, a critical skill for maintaining reliable AI systems. The ability to systematically investigate and identify issues separates exceptional monitoring professionals from those who merely know the basics.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where a previously well-performing model has experienced significant performance degradation.
• Create a dataset that includes:
• Historical performance metrics over time
• Sample input data from before and after the degradation
• Model prediction logs
• Any relevant system or infrastructure changes
• Intentionally include clues pointing to a specific issue (e.g., data drift, concept drift, infrastructure problem, etc.)
• Provide access to these materials in a format that's easy to analyze (CSV files, Jupyter notebook, etc.)
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided materials about a model experiencing performance degradation.
• Analyze the data to identify potential root causes of the performance issue.
• Document your investigation process, including:
• What metrics you examined
• What patterns or anomalies you identified
• What hypotheses you formed and tested
• What conclusions you reached
• Prepare a brief explanation of your findings, including:
• The likely root cause(s) of the degradation
• Evidence supporting your conclusion
• Recommended next steps to address the issue
• Be prepared to discuss alternative explanations you considered and ruled out.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the thoroughness of the investigation, the logical reasoning demonstrated, and the clarity of the explanation.
• For improvement feedback, suggest one additional analysis or consideration that could have strengthened their investigation.
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to explain how they would incorporate this additional analysis and how it might affect their conclusions.

Activity #3: Monitoring System Implementation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's technical ability to implement monitoring solutions using industry tools and frameworks. It tests practical coding skills and knowledge of monitoring best practices in a realistic setting.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified ML model (e.g., a basic classifier) deployed in a test environment.
• Provide access to a development environment with common monitoring tools installed (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana, MLflow, or similar tools relevant to your stack).
• Create a starter code repository with the model serving code and basic infrastructure.
• Define specific monitoring requirements (e.g., track prediction distribution, latency, feature drift).
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member available to assist with environment issues.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement a monitoring solution for the provided model using the available tools.
• Your implementation should track at least:
• Model prediction statistics (e.g., distribution of outputs)
• Performance metrics (if ground truth is available)
• System metrics (latency, throughput)
• Data drift indicators
• Write clean, documented code that follows best practices.
• Create at least one visualization or dashboard that displays the monitored metrics.
• Implement at least one alerting rule for a critical metric.
• Be prepared to explain your implementation choices and how you would extend this system for production use.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the technical implementation, code quality, and effectiveness of the monitoring solution.
• For improvement feedback, suggest one aspect of the implementation that could be enhanced (e.g., more efficient code, better visualization, additional metric).
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to refine their implementation based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area identified.

Activity #4: Monitoring Strategy Communication

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to communicate complex technical monitoring concepts to non-technical stakeholders. Effective communication is essential for ensuring organizational alignment and support for monitoring initiatives.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where the candidate needs to explain a model monitoring strategy to business stakeholders.
• Provide background information about:
• The business context and importance of the model
• The technical monitoring approach being implemented
• Recent or potential issues that monitoring would help address
• The stakeholder audience (e.g., product managers, executives)
• Prepare 2-3 team members to role-play as stakeholders with varying levels of technical understanding.
• Allow 30 minutes for preparation and 15-20 minutes for the presentation/discussion.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Prepare a brief (10-minute) presentation explaining the model monitoring strategy to business stakeholders.
• Your presentation should cover:
• Why monitoring is necessary for this particular model
• What metrics will be tracked and what they mean in business terms
• How the monitoring system will detect and alert on issues
• What actions will be taken when problems are detected
• The business value and ROI of implementing this monitoring
• Use appropriate language for a non-technical audience while still conveying the essential technical concepts.
• Be prepared to answer questions from stakeholders about the approach.
• Create simple visual aids if helpful (can be hand-drawn or digital).

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the clarity of communication, ability to translate technical concepts, and effectiveness in addressing stakeholder concerns.
• For improvement feedback, suggest one aspect of the communication that could be enhanced (e.g., better business context, clearer explanation of a technical concept).
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to revise and re-present a specific portion of their explanation based on the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each of these exercises take in an interview process?

Each exercise is designed to take between 45-90 minutes, depending on complexity. For a comprehensive assessment, you might use one or two exercises across different interview stages rather than attempting all four. The monitoring dashboard design and root cause analysis exercises work well as take-home assignments, while the implementation and communication exercises are effective as on-site interviews.

Should candidates be allowed to use reference materials or the internet during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, reference materials, and even internet searches creates a more realistic working environment. In real-world monitoring scenarios, professionals regularly consult documentation and resources. This approach tests how candidates find and apply information rather than just what they've memorized.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different monitoring tools than our organization?

Focus on the principles and approach rather than specific tool knowledge. A candidate who demonstrates strong monitoring fundamentals using tools they're familiar with can likely transfer those skills to your stack. Look for understanding of key monitoring concepts, systematic problem-solving, and clear reasoning about metric selection and thresholds.

What if we don't have a technical environment set up for the implementation exercise?

You can modify the implementation exercise to be more conceptual. Ask candidates to write pseudocode, create a detailed technical design document, or use a simplified environment like a Jupyter notebook with simulated monitoring. The key is testing their understanding of how to implement monitoring in practice, even if they can't execute the full implementation during the interview.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Provide clear context and background information for each exercise. Allow candidates to ask clarifying questions before beginning. Consider offering a choice between exercises that test the same skills but in different contexts. Be mindful of potential biases in evaluation and use structured scoring rubrics that focus on the core skills being assessed rather than familiarity with specific tools or domains.

Can these exercises be adapted for junior candidates with less experience?

Yes, these exercises can be scaled in complexity. For junior candidates, provide more structure and guidance, focus on fundamental monitoring concepts rather than advanced techniques, and adjust expectations for the depth of analysis. The communication exercise is particularly valuable for assessing junior candidates' potential to grow into more senior roles.

Effective AI model performance monitoring is a multifaceted skill that combines technical expertise, analytical thinking, and communication abilities. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you can identify candidates who not only understand monitoring concepts but can apply them effectively in real-world scenarios. This approach leads to better hiring decisions and ultimately stronger AI systems that maintain their performance and value over time.

At Yardstick, we're committed to helping organizations build exceptional technical teams through thoughtful, evidence-based hiring practices. For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Model Performance Monitoring by signing up for a free Yardstick account