Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI-Driven Product Experiment Design Skills

AI-driven product experiment design has become a critical skill in today's technology landscape. As companies increasingly integrate artificial intelligence into their products and services, the ability to design, implement, and analyze experiments that leverage AI capabilities has become invaluable. These experiments help teams validate hypotheses, optimize features, and ensure AI implementations actually deliver value to users.

Finding candidates who excel at AI-driven product experiment design requires more than just reviewing resumes or conducting traditional interviews. The complexity of this skill demands practical evaluation through relevant work samples that simulate real-world scenarios. Strong candidates need to demonstrate not only technical understanding of AI concepts but also product thinking, experimental design methodology, and the ability to translate insights into actionable recommendations.

The work samples outlined below are designed to evaluate a candidate's proficiency across multiple dimensions of AI-driven product experimentation. They assess strategic thinking, tactical implementation skills, analytical capabilities, and the ability to communicate complex concepts clearly. By observing candidates as they work through these exercises, hiring teams can gain valuable insights into how candidates approach problems, structure their thinking, and adapt to feedback.

Implementing these work samples as part of your interview process will help you identify candidates who can truly drive innovation through thoughtful AI experimentation. The best candidates will show a balance of technical depth, product intuition, and methodological rigor—qualities that are difficult to assess through traditional interview questions alone.

Activity #1: AI Feature Experiment Design

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to design a comprehensive experiment for testing an AI-driven product feature. It assesses their understanding of experimental design principles, their ability to identify appropriate metrics, and their skill in accounting for the unique challenges of AI systems such as model performance variability and potential biases.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a brief description of a product and a proposed AI feature that needs validation through experimentation.
• Example: "Our e-commerce platform wants to implement an AI-powered product recommendation system that personalizes suggestions based on browsing behavior, purchase history, and similar user profiles."
• Include relevant context such as current metrics, business objectives, and any constraints.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise, which can be conducted remotely or in-person.
• Provide access to a collaborative document or whiteboard for the candidate to outline their experiment design.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design an experiment to validate whether the proposed AI feature delivers value to users and the business.
• Your experiment design should include:
• Clear hypothesis statement(s)
• Primary and secondary success metrics
• Experiment methodology (A/B test, multivariate test, etc.)
• Sample size and power calculations
• Control and treatment group definitions
• Duration recommendations
• Potential confounding variables and how to control for them
• Considerations specific to AI implementation (model training approach, feedback loops, etc.)
• Create a brief implementation plan outlining the key steps required to execute this experiment.
• Be prepared to explain your rationale for each element of your design.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their experiment design, provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., "Your approach to defining success metrics was comprehensive and tied well to business outcomes").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Your design didn't fully address how to handle cold-start problems for new users").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach based on this feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised design.

Activity #2: AI Experiment Analysis and Decision-Making

This activity tests a candidate's ability to analyze experimental results from an AI feature test and make data-driven recommendations. It evaluates analytical thinking, statistical understanding, and the ability to translate complex findings into actionable insights.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a mock dataset representing results from an A/B test of an AI feature.
• The dataset should include:
• Key performance metrics before and after implementation
• Segmented results across different user groups
• Some ambiguity or unexpected patterns that require deeper analysis
• Both positive and negative signals
• Provide context about the experiment's original hypothesis and goals.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare questions to probe the candidate's thinking during their presentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided experimental results from a recent A/B test of an AI feature.
• Analyze the data to determine whether the experiment was successful.
• Prepare a brief presentation (10-15 minutes) that includes:
• Summary of key findings
• Statistical significance assessment
• Interpretation of results across different user segments
• Explanation of any unexpected patterns or anomalies
• Recommendations for next steps (implement, iterate, or abandon)
• If recommending iteration, specific changes to test in the next version
• Considerations for scaling the feature if recommending implementation
• Your analysis should address both the technical performance of the AI system and the business impact.
• Be prepared to answer questions about your methodology and conclusions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your segmentation analysis revealed important insights about how different user groups responded to the feature").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Your statistical significance assessment didn't account for multiple hypothesis testing").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising one section of their analysis based on this feedback.
• Evaluate how well they incorporate the feedback and whether they demonstrate flexibility in their thinking.

Activity #3: AI Experiment Technical Implementation

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to translate an experiment design into technical implementation details. It evaluates their understanding of the technical components required for AI experimentation and their ability to anticipate implementation challenges.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a high-level experiment design for an AI feature test.
• Include information about the current technical architecture and available data.
• Specify any constraints or requirements (e.g., performance requirements, privacy considerations).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions about the existing systems.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided experiment design for an AI feature test.
• Create a technical implementation plan that includes:
• Data requirements and sources
• Model training and evaluation approach
• Feature engineering considerations
• Experiment instrumentation (how you'll collect the necessary data)
• Implementation architecture (how the experiment will be deployed)
• Monitoring and alerting setup
• Rollback plan in case of issues
• Timeline and resource estimates
• Your plan should be detailed enough that an engineering team could implement it with minimal additional guidance.
• Consider potential technical challenges and how they might be addressed.
• Be prepared to explain your technical choices and trade-offs.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their implementation plan, provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., "Your approach to feature engineering demonstrated deep understanding of the available data").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Your monitoring plan didn't include sufficient safeguards for detecting model drift").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise the specific section of their plan that needs improvement.
• Assess how well they incorporate the feedback and whether they demonstrate technical adaptability.

Activity #4: Complex AI Experiment Roadmap Planning

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to plan a series of experiments to develop and refine an AI-driven product feature over time. It tests strategic thinking, prioritization skills, and understanding of how to iteratively improve AI systems.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a description of a complex AI product feature that would require multiple experiments to fully develop and optimize.
• Example: "We want to develop an AI-powered content moderation system that can automatically detect and filter inappropriate user-generated content across multiple content types (text, images, video)."
• Include business context, current state, and ultimate goals for the feature.
• Allow 60-75 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide access to a collaborative document or whiteboard for the candidate to create their roadmap.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop an experimentation roadmap for iteratively building and refining the described AI feature.
• Your roadmap should include:
• A sequence of 4-6 experiments that build upon each other
• For each experiment:
  • The specific hypothesis being tested
  • Key metrics to evaluate
  • Expected learnings and how they inform subsequent experiments
  • Potential pivot points based on different outcomes
• Dependencies between experiments
• Estimated timeline for the overall roadmap
• Key milestones and decision points
• Consider both technical and product aspects in your planning.
• Explain how you would balance quick learning cycles with meaningful progress toward the end goal.
• Be prepared to discuss how you would adapt the roadmap based on different experimental outcomes.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their experimentation roadmap, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your approach to breaking down the complex problem into testable components was very effective").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Your roadmap didn't sufficiently address how to handle potential ethical concerns with the AI system").
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes revising or expanding their roadmap based on this feedback.
• Evaluate how well they incorporate the feedback and whether they demonstrate strategic flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each of these work sample activities take?

Most of these activities are designed to take 45-60 minutes, with the complex roadmap planning potentially taking 60-75 minutes. However, you can adjust the scope and time allocation based on your interview process. If time is limited, consider assigning one activity as pre-work and focusing on discussion and feedback during the interview.

Should candidates complete these activities live or as take-home assignments?

Both approaches have merit. Live exercises allow you to observe the candidate's thinking process and problem-solving approach in real-time. Take-home assignments may yield more polished results and reduce candidate stress. A hybrid approach works well: assign the initial work as take-home, then use the interview time for presentation, questions, and the feedback/revision portion.

How should we evaluate candidates who have different approaches than what we expected?

Focus on the quality of thinking rather than specific solutions. Strong candidates may propose valid approaches you hadn't considered. Evaluate whether their approach is logical, addresses the core requirements, demonstrates understanding of AI experimentation principles, and shows awareness of potential challenges. The feedback portion is particularly valuable for seeing how they respond to alternative perspectives.

Do we need to create custom scenarios for each role or can we use these examples directly?

While the structure of these activities can be used as-is, you should customize the specific scenarios to match your product domain and the specific AI applications relevant to your company. This ensures you're testing skills that directly translate to success in your environment. The more relevant the scenario is to your actual work, the more predictive the assessment will be.

How do we ensure these work samples don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Provide clear context and background information so candidates aren't relying on domain-specific knowledge they might not have. Be explicit about what you're evaluating and provide the same resources to all candidates. Consider offering a brief primer on your product and relevant AI concepts before the exercise. When evaluating, focus on problem-solving approach and learning ability rather than just prior knowledge.

Should we use the same work sample for all candidates or rotate between different ones?

For consistency in evaluation, it's best to use the same work sample for all candidates interviewing for the same position. This allows for more direct comparison. However, you might want to have 2-3 different exercises in your toolkit to prevent candidates from sharing details with future applicants. If you use multiple exercises, ensure they test the same core skills and have similar difficulty levels.

AI-driven product experiment design is a multifaceted skill that combines technical expertise, product thinking, and methodological rigor. By incorporating these work samples into your interview process, you'll be able to identify candidates who can truly drive innovation through thoughtful experimentation. The best candidates will demonstrate not only technical competence but also strategic thinking, attention to detail, and the ability to adapt based on feedback.

At Yardstick, we're committed to helping companies build exceptional teams through better hiring practices. For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out our AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Want to build a complete interview guide for evaluating AI-Driven Product Experiment Design skills? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!