Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Web Developers

In the digital landscape, web developers serve as the architects of online experiences, translating design concepts into functional, responsive websites and applications. The quality of your web development team directly impacts your organization's digital presence, user experience, and ultimately, business success. Finding developers who possess not only technical proficiency but also problem-solving abilities, attention to detail, and collaborative skills is crucial for building robust digital solutions.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in a web development context. While resumes and portfolios showcase past work, they don't demonstrate how candidates approach new challenges, solve problems in real-time, or adapt to your specific technical environment. This is where carefully designed work samples become invaluable.

Work samples provide a window into a candidate's practical skills, thought processes, and working style. By observing how candidates tackle realistic development tasks, you can assess their coding proficiency, problem-solving approach, attention to detail, and ability to communicate technical concepts clearly. These exercises reveal whether candidates can translate theoretical knowledge into practical solutions—a critical skill for effective web developers.

The following work sample exercises are designed to evaluate the essential competencies of web developer candidates. Each activity targets specific skills required for success in the role, from technical coding abilities to collaboration and planning. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and make more informed hiring decisions.

These exercises go beyond testing basic coding skills to assess how candidates approach complex problems, collaborate with others, and maintain high standards in their work—all crucial indicators of long-term success in a web development role. Let's explore four comprehensive work samples that will help you identify truly exceptional web development talent.

Activity #1: Responsive Component Implementation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's core technical skills in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript implementation. By asking candidates to build a specific UI component that must work across different screen sizes, you'll assess their coding proficiency, attention to detail, and understanding of responsive design principles. This activity directly tests the candidate's ability to "write clean, well-documented, and efficient code" as mentioned in the core responsibilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a design mockup (in image format) of a common UI component such as a navigation menu, card layout, form, or modal dialog.
• Include mockups for both desktop and mobile views to test responsive implementation.
• Provide a basic HTML template with CSS and JavaScript files already linked.
• Set a reasonable time limit (60-90 minutes) for this exercise.
• Consider using a collaborative coding environment like CodePen or CodeSandbox that allows you to observe the candidate's work in real-time.
• Prepare specific requirements such as accessibility standards, browser compatibility, or performance considerations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement the provided UI component design using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
• Ensure your implementation is responsive and works correctly on both desktop and mobile viewports.
• Write clean, well-documented code with appropriate comments.
• Focus on both functionality and visual accuracy to the provided design.
• Consider accessibility best practices in your implementation.
• Be prepared to explain your approach, including any trade-offs or decisions you made during implementation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After completion, the interviewer should provide immediate feedback on one aspect the candidate executed well (e.g., "Your CSS organization was excellent") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The mobile menu animation could be smoother").
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement, observing how they respond to feedback and their ability to quickly iterate on their code.
• This tests the candidate's adaptability and receptiveness to feedback—key traits for successful collaboration in development teams.

Activity #2: Bug Identification and Resolution

This exercise assesses a candidate's debugging skills and problem-solving approach—critical abilities for any web developer. By presenting code with intentional bugs, you'll evaluate how effectively candidates can identify issues, determine root causes, and implement solutions. This directly tests the "troubleshoot and debug technical issues" responsibility from the job description.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a small web application or component with 3-5 intentional bugs of varying difficulty.
• Include a mix of bug types: visual/CSS issues, JavaScript functionality problems, and potentially a performance issue.
• Document the expected behavior so candidates understand what the code should do when working correctly.
• Provide access to browser developer tools and any other debugging resources candidates might need.
• Set a time limit of 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Create a checklist of the bugs for interviewers to track which ones the candidate identifies and fixes.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code and identify as many bugs as you can find.
• For each bug you identify, explain:
• What the issue is
• Why it's occurring
• How you would fix it
• Implement fixes for the bugs you've identified.
• Prioritize which bugs you address first and be prepared to explain your reasoning.
• Document any additional improvements you would make to the code beyond fixing the immediate issues.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate has completed their debugging, highlight one effective debugging technique they used and one alternative approach they could have tried.
• Ask the candidate to implement the alternative approach to fix one of the remaining bugs or to improve one of their existing fixes.
• Observe how quickly they adapt to the new approach and whether they can successfully implement it.
• This tests the candidate's flexibility in problem-solving and ability to consider multiple solutions.

Activity #3: Web Project Planning Exercise

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to plan and architect a web development project—a crucial skill for more complex assignments. It assesses the candidate's technical knowledge, organization, and ability to anticipate challenges before writing code. This activity aligns with the "design & develop" responsibility and tests the candidate's ability to think strategically about web development.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a brief for a fictional web project (e.g., an e-commerce feature, a dashboard, or a content management system).
• Include specific requirements, user stories, and any technical constraints.
• Provide any necessary context about the existing system or environment.
• Prepare questions to probe the candidate's reasoning during their presentation.
• Allow 30-45 minutes for preparation and 15-20 minutes for presentation and discussion.
• Provide paper or a digital whiteboarding tool for the candidate to sketch their solution.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the project requirements and develop a technical implementation plan.
• Your plan should include:
• Overall architecture and approach
• Technologies and frameworks you would use (with justification)
• Database structure (if applicable)
• Key components and their interactions
• Potential challenges and how you would address them
• Timeline estimates for major components
• Create a simple diagram or sketch to illustrate your proposed architecture.
• Be prepared to explain your decisions and discuss alternative approaches.
• Consider scalability, performance, and maintainability in your plan.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strong aspect of their plan and one area that could be improved or considered differently.
• Ask the candidate to revise a specific part of their plan based on your feedback (e.g., "How would you modify your database structure to handle the additional requirement I just mentioned?").
• Observe how they incorporate the feedback and whether they can adapt their thinking on the fly.
• This tests the candidate's ability to respond to changing requirements—a common scenario in web development projects.

Activity #4: Code Review and Refactoring

This exercise assesses a candidate's code quality standards, attention to detail, and knowledge of best practices. By asking candidates to review and improve existing code, you'll evaluate their ability to identify inefficiencies, security issues, and maintainability concerns. This directly relates to the "participate actively in code reviews" responsibility and the "attention to detail" competency.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a code sample (approximately 100-200 lines) that contains various issues:
• Performance inefficiencies
• Security vulnerabilities
• Maintainability problems
• Inconsistent styling or naming conventions
• Accessibility issues
• Include a mix of obvious and subtle problems to test different levels of expertise.
• Provide context about what the code is supposed to do.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Create a reference list of the issues for interviewers to compare against the candidate's findings.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code sample and identify areas for improvement.
• Document each issue you find, explaining:
• What the problem is
• Why it's problematic (impact on performance, security, maintainability, etc.)
• How you would refactor or improve it
• Implement refactoring for 2-3 of the most critical issues you've identified.
• Consider both functional improvements and code style/organization.
• Be prepared to discuss the trade-offs of different approaches to solving the issues you've found.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate has presented their findings, highlight one insightful observation they made and suggest one additional issue they might have missed.
• Ask the candidate to refactor the additional issue you pointed out.
• Observe their approach to implementing the fix and whether they consider potential side effects of their changes.
• This tests the candidate's ability to quickly understand unfamiliar code and make improvements while maintaining functionality—a key skill for developers working on established codebases.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each work sample exercise take?

Each exercise should typically take 45-90 minutes, depending on complexity. The entire work sample session could be scheduled for half a day, with breaks between exercises, or split across multiple days. For remote candidates, consider sending one take-home exercise (like the code review) ahead of time and conducting the others during a live session.

Should we use the same exercises for junior and senior developer candidates?

While the basic structure can remain the same, adjust the complexity and expectations based on experience level. For junior developers, focus more on fundamental skills and potential for growth. For senior candidates, include more architectural challenges, edge cases, and expect more sophisticated solutions and deeper insights during code reviews.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different technologies than our stack?

Focus on evaluating the candidate's problem-solving approach, coding principles, and architectural thinking rather than specific syntax. Good developers can transfer skills between technologies. Consider allowing candidates to use their preferred technologies for the exercises, as this will show you their strongest work, while asking questions about how they would approach the same problems in your stack.

What if a candidate doesn't complete an exercise within the allotted time?

This is valuable information in itself. Observe how they prioritize tasks when time is limited and what they choose to focus on. A candidate who delivers a partial solution with clean, well-tested code may be preferable to one who rushes to complete everything with poor quality. Discuss their approach to time management during the follow-up conversation.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates who get nervous during timed assessments?

Consider offering a mix of live and take-home exercises. Clearly communicate expectations beforehand and create a supportive environment during live exercises. Remember that some nervousness is normal, and look for candidates who can work through it. The feedback portion of each exercise also gives candidates a chance to demonstrate their ability to incorporate feedback, which can sometimes reveal strengths not apparent in their initial solution.

Should we share these exercises with candidates before the interview?

Providing general information about the types of exercises helps candidates prepare appropriately without revealing specific details. For example, you might tell candidates they'll be asked to implement a UI component and debug existing code, but not share the exact requirements. This reduces anxiety while still allowing you to assess their authentic skills.

In today's competitive market for web development talent, implementing these targeted work sample exercises will significantly improve your ability to identify candidates with the right blend of technical skills and professional qualities. By observing how candidates approach realistic challenges, you'll gain insights that traditional interviews simply cannot provide.

Remember that the goal of these exercises is not just to test technical skills but to evaluate how candidates think, solve problems, and respond to feedback—all crucial indicators of their potential success in your organization. The best candidates will demonstrate not only coding proficiency but also clear communication, thoughtful problem-solving, and a commitment to quality.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also explore our Web Developer Job Description for additional insights into defining this critical role.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account here