Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Angular Developers

Angular developers are the architects behind dynamic, responsive web applications that power modern businesses. Finding the right Angular talent is critical as these developers not only build user interfaces but also ensure application performance, maintainability, and scalability. The technical nature of this role makes traditional interviews insufficient for properly evaluating candidates.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world Angular challenges. Unlike theoretical questions or whiteboard exercises, practical work samples reveal a candidate's coding style, problem-solving approach, and technical decision-making. They demonstrate whether a candidate can translate Angular concepts into functional solutions.

The best Angular developers combine technical expertise with thoughtful architecture decisions and clean coding practices. Work samples help identify candidates who not only know Angular syntax but understand component design, state management, and performance optimization. These exercises also reveal how candidates handle feedback and iterate on their solutions—a critical skill in collaborative development environments.

By implementing the following work samples in your Angular developer hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and identify those who will truly excel in your development team. These exercises are designed to evaluate both technical proficiency and the soft skills necessary for success in modern development environments.

Activity #1: Component Development Challenge

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to implement Angular components, manage data flow, and create responsive user interfaces. It tests fundamental Angular skills including component architecture, template syntax, and reactive programming concepts.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a design mockup (as an image or Figma link) of a moderately complex UI component, such as a data table with filtering, sorting, and pagination.
• Include a JSON data file that contains sample data to populate the component.
• Specify any required functionality (sorting, filtering, etc.) and any specific Angular features you want them to demonstrate (e.g., reactive forms, RxJS operators).
• Allow candidates to complete this exercise in their own development environment within a 2-3 hour timeframe.
• Request that they submit their code via a GitHub repository with clear documentation on how to run the application.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Create an Angular component that implements the provided design mockup.
• Use the provided JSON data to populate your component.
• Implement the specified functionality (sorting, filtering, pagination, etc.).
• Write clean, maintainable code following Angular best practices.
• Include basic unit tests for your component.
• Document any assumptions or design decisions you made during implementation.
• Be prepared to explain your implementation choices during the review.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the submission, provide specific feedback on one aspect the candidate implemented well (e.g., "Your use of RxJS operators for the filtering logic was elegant and efficient").
• Provide one area for improvement (e.g., "The component could be broken down into smaller sub-components for better maintainability").
• Ask the candidate to spend 15-20 minutes implementing the suggested improvement and explain their approach to addressing the feedback.

Activity #2: Angular Application Debugging

This exercise assesses a candidate's troubleshooting abilities and understanding of Angular's internal workings. Debugging skills are essential for maintaining and improving existing codebases, which is often a significant part of an Angular developer's responsibilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a small Angular application with 3-5 intentionally placed bugs of varying difficulty.
• Include issues related to common Angular problems such as change detection, dependency injection, routing, or form validation.
• Provide the candidate with access to the codebase via a GitHub repository or a CodeSandbox link.
• Include a brief description of the application's intended functionality and a list of symptoms (not the root causes) of the bugs.
• Allow 1-2 hours for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Clone or fork the provided repository and get the application running locally.
• Identify and fix the bugs in the application.
• For each bug, document:
• The symptom you observed
• The root cause of the issue
• Your solution and why it works
• Any alternative approaches you considered
• Submit your fixed version of the code along with your documentation.
• Be prepared to walk through your debugging process and explain your solutions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one debugging approach or fix that demonstrated strong problem-solving skills.
• Suggest an alternative or more optimal solution for one of the bugs.
• Ask the candidate to implement the suggested alternative approach and explain the advantages of this solution compared to their original fix.

Activity #3: Angular Architecture Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design scalable Angular applications and make architectural decisions. It tests their understanding of Angular's ecosystem and best practices for large-scale applications.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario for a medium to large-scale application with specific requirements (e.g., a customer portal with authentication, multiple user roles, real-time updates, etc.).
• Provide business requirements, expected user flows, and any technical constraints.
• Ask candidates to create an architecture document rather than actual code.
• Allow candidates 2-3 hours to complete this exercise, or provide it as a take-home assignment with a 24-hour turnaround.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design an Angular application architecture that addresses the provided requirements.
• Create a document that includes:
• Module structure and lazy loading strategy
• State management approach (NgRx, services, etc.)
• Authentication and authorization implementation
• Data fetching and caching strategy
• Component hierarchy and reusability plan
• Testing strategy
• Include diagrams or visual representations where appropriate.
• Justify your architectural decisions and explain any trade-offs you considered.
• Be prepared to present and defend your architecture in a follow-up discussion.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Commend one particularly strong aspect of their architecture (e.g., "Your approach to state management demonstrates a deep understanding of data flow in complex applications").
• Suggest one area where the architecture could be improved or where an alternative approach might be beneficial.
• Ask the candidate to revise that specific portion of their architecture based on the feedback and explain how the new approach addresses the concerns raised.

Activity #4: Performance Optimization Challenge

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to identify and resolve performance issues in Angular applications. It evaluates their understanding of Angular's change detection, rendering optimization, and general web performance principles.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simple but intentionally inefficient Angular application that exhibits performance problems.
• Include common issues such as excessive change detection cycles, unoptimized rendering, memory leaks, or inefficient data handling.
• Provide the candidate with access to the application code and a list of performance issues reported by hypothetical users.
• Include Chrome DevTools performance profiles or Lighthouse reports showing the performance issues.
• Allow 2-3 hours for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided application using performance profiling tools.
• Identify the root causes of the performance issues.
• Implement optimizations to address each identified issue.
• Document each optimization you make, including:
• The performance issue identified
• The root cause
• Your solution and its expected impact
• Before and after performance metrics
• Be prepared to explain your optimization strategy and demonstrate the performance improvements.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one optimization that effectively improved performance.
• Suggest one additional optimization technique or approach that could further enhance performance.
• Ask the candidate to implement the suggested optimization and measure its impact on the application's performance.
• Have them explain how this additional optimization complements their initial approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allow candidates to complete these work samples?

Each work sample should typically take 1-3 hours to complete. For the Component Development and Architecture Planning exercises, consider allowing candidates to complete them as take-home assignments with a 24-48 hour window. The Debugging and Performance Optimization exercises can be conducted during an extended interview session or as take-home assignments depending on your hiring process.

Should we provide these exercises sequentially or choose just one?

For senior Angular developer positions, we recommend using at least two different exercises to evaluate different skill sets. The Architecture Planning exercise paired with either the Component Development or Debugging exercise provides a good balance. For mid-level positions, the Component Development and Debugging exercises are most appropriate. Tailor your selection to the specific requirements of your open position.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different approaches than we expected?

Different approaches often indicate creative thinking and diverse experience. Evaluate solutions based on effectiveness, code quality, and reasoning rather than adherence to a specific expected approach. The candidate's ability to explain and justify their decisions is often more valuable than following a particular pattern.

What if a candidate doesn't complete all aspects of the exercise?

Partial completion with high quality is often more valuable than complete implementation with poor quality. Evaluate what was completed, the prioritization decisions made, and the candidate's communication about what they would have done with more time. This provides insight into their prioritization skills and technical judgment.

How can we make these exercises accessible and fair to all candidates?

Provide clear instructions and expectations. Allow reasonable accommodations for candidates who request them. Consider providing options for different environments or tools based on candidate preferences. Be transparent about evaluation criteria and provide the same resources to all candidates.

Should we compensate candidates for completing these work samples?

For extensive take-home assignments (over 3 hours), consider offering compensation, especially for senior roles. This demonstrates respect for candidates' time and expertise while ensuring you receive thoughtful, quality submissions.

The right Angular developer can significantly impact your application's quality, performance, and maintainability. By incorporating these practical work samples into your hiring process, you'll be able to identify candidates who not only understand Angular concepts but can apply them effectively to real-world challenges.

Yardstick's suite of hiring tools can help you further refine your Angular developer hiring process. Our AI-powered solutions can assist with creating comprehensive job descriptions, generating targeted interview questions, and developing complete interview guides tailored to your specific Angular development needs.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for hiring Angular developers? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!