Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring AI Quality Assurance Engineers

AI Quality Assurance Engineers serve as the critical gatekeepers between AI development and deployment, ensuring that machine learning models and AI systems perform reliably, accurately, and ethically. Unlike traditional software QA, AI quality assurance requires specialized knowledge of machine learning concepts, an understanding of statistical evaluation metrics, and the ability to identify potential biases or edge cases that could lead to model failure.

The complexity of AI systems makes traditional testing approaches insufficient. AI models can behave unpredictably with new inputs, may drift in performance over time, and often operate as "black boxes" where the decision-making process isn't transparent. This makes the role of an AI QA Engineer particularly challenging and vital to an organization's success.

When hiring for this specialized position, theoretical knowledge alone isn't enough to predict on-the-job success. Practical work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world AI testing scenarios, revealing their technical proficiency, problem-solving methodology, and attention to detail. These exercises also demonstrate a candidate's ability to communicate complex technical findings to various stakeholders.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate the essential skills required for an AI Quality Assurance Engineer. They assess a candidate's ability to develop comprehensive test plans, identify defects in AI systems, create automated testing frameworks, and collaborate effectively with cross-functional teams. By implementing these exercises in your hiring process, you'll gain valuable insights into which candidates possess both the technical expertise and critical thinking skills necessary for success in this role.

Activity #1: AI Model Test Plan Development

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop comprehensive test strategies for AI systems. A well-structured test plan is the foundation of effective quality assurance, requiring both technical knowledge and strategic thinking. This activity reveals how candidates approach the systematic validation of AI models, including their understanding of appropriate evaluation metrics and testing methodologies.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with documentation about a fictional AI model (e.g., a sentiment analysis model, recommendation system, or image classification model).
• Include information about the model's purpose, architecture, training data characteristics, and expected performance metrics.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a sample test plan to use as a reference when evaluating the candidate's submission.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions during the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI model documentation.
• Develop a comprehensive test plan that includes:
• Test objectives and scope
• Required testing environments and tools
• Data requirements for testing (including test datasets)
• Testing methodologies (unit tests, integration tests, etc.)
• Evaluation metrics and acceptance criteria
• Potential edge cases and failure modes to test
• Approach for testing model bias and fairness
• Be prepared to explain your rationale for each component of the test plan.
• Submit your test plan in a structured document format.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the test plan, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your inclusion of fairness testing metrics was particularly thorough") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The plan could benefit from more specific edge cases related to the model's domain").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes enhancing the identified area for improvement.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised plan.

Activity #2: AI Bug Identification and Analysis

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to identify, analyze, and document issues in AI systems. It tests their attention to detail, analytical thinking, and understanding of how AI models can fail in subtle ways. This skill is crucial for preventing problematic AI behaviors from reaching production environments.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a dataset and corresponding AI model outputs that contain several deliberate issues, such as:
• Biased predictions for certain demographic groups
• Poor performance on specific edge cases
• Inconsistent outputs for similar inputs
• Data leakage issues
• Overfitting signals
• Provide visualization tools or notebooks that allow the candidate to explore the data and model outputs.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a comprehensive list of all planted issues to compare against the candidate's findings.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided dataset and model outputs to identify potential issues or bugs.
• For each issue identified:
• Describe the problem in detail
• Provide evidence supporting your finding (specific examples, metrics, etc.)
• Assess the potential impact on users or business outcomes
• Suggest possible root causes
• Recommend next steps for investigation or resolution
• Document your findings in a structured bug report format.
• Prioritize the issues based on their severity and impact.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's bug report, highlight one particularly well-documented issue and one issue that could benefit from deeper analysis.
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes expanding their analysis of the issue that needs improvement.
• Evaluate their ability to dive deeper into technical details when prompted and their skill in communicating complex technical issues clearly.

Activity #3: Automated Testing Framework Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design and implement automated testing solutions for AI systems. Automation is essential for efficient and consistent quality assurance, especially when dealing with complex AI models that require frequent retraining and validation.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a simple Python-based AI model (e.g., a scikit-learn classifier) with sample data.
• Include basic documentation about the model's functionality and expected behavior.
• Ensure the development environment has necessary libraries installed (pytest, numpy, pandas, etc.).
• Allocate 60-75 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a sample solution that demonstrates effective automated testing approaches.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design and implement an automated testing framework for the provided AI model that includes:
• Unit tests for individual components
• Integration tests for the end-to-end pipeline
• Performance tests to evaluate model metrics
• Data validation tests to ensure input quality
• Regression tests to catch potential issues after model updates
• Implement at least one test for each category using Python and appropriate testing libraries (e.g., pytest).
• Write clean, well-documented code with appropriate assertions and error handling.
• Include a brief README explaining your testing approach and how to run the tests.
• Be prepared to explain how your framework could scale to more complex AI systems.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's code, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your data validation tests were particularly thorough") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The performance tests could include more comprehensive metrics").
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes enhancing the identified area for improvement.
• Evaluate their coding style, test design principles, and ability to incorporate feedback effectively.

Activity #4: Cross-Functional Collaboration Simulation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to collaborate effectively with data scientists and other stakeholders when addressing AI quality issues. Strong communication and collaboration skills are essential for AI QA Engineers, who must work closely with cross-functional teams to ensure AI systems meet requirements and perform reliably.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where an AI model is not performing as expected in production.
• Create a brief that includes:
• Model performance metrics showing degradation
• User feedback reporting issues
• Technical documentation about the model
• Recent changes to the model or data pipeline
• Assign team members to role-play as a data scientist, product manager, and engineer.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare discussion points and questions for each role player.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided scenario and supporting materials.
• Prepare for and participate in a cross-functional meeting to:
• Present your analysis of the quality issues
• Ask clarifying questions to the data scientist about model behavior
• Discuss potential testing approaches with the engineer
• Explain technical concepts to the product manager in accessible terms
• Collaboratively develop a plan to address the issues
• Document the agreed-upon action items and testing strategy after the meeting.
• Focus on both technical accuracy and effective communication throughout the exercise.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the simulation, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., "You effectively translated technical concepts for the product manager") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider asking more probing questions to uncover root causes").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to reflect and write a brief follow-up email to the team that addresses the area for improvement.
• Evaluate their ability to adapt their communication style to different stakeholders and incorporate feedback into their approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-75 minutes, depending on the complexity. For remote candidates, consider spreading the exercises across multiple interview sessions. For on-site interviews, select the 1-2 most relevant exercises based on your specific needs.

Should we provide these exercises before the interview or during it?

The Test Plan Development and Bug Identification exercises work well as take-home assignments with a time limit, while the Automated Testing Framework and Cross-Functional Collaboration exercises are more effective during live interviews where you can observe problem-solving approaches in real-time.

How should we evaluate candidates who have experience in QA but are new to AI?

Focus on their testing fundamentals, analytical thinking, and learning agility. Strong QA professionals can adapt their skills to AI systems if they demonstrate solid testing principles and a willingness to learn. Consider providing more context about AI concepts in the exercise materials.

What if we don't have team members who can effectively evaluate these exercises?

This is a common challenge when hiring for specialized roles. Consider involving external consultants or advisors with AI QA experience for the evaluation process. Alternatively, focus on exercises that align with your team's evaluation capabilities while still testing core skills.

How can we make these exercises more specific to our company's AI applications?

Customize the scenarios, datasets, and models to reflect your specific industry and AI use cases. For example, if you work in healthcare, use a medical diagnosis model example; for e-commerce, use a recommendation system scenario. This helps evaluate candidates' domain knowledge alongside their technical skills.

Should we share evaluation criteria with candidates beforehand?

Providing general evaluation criteria (without specific details) helps candidates understand what you're looking for and reduces anxiety. This typically leads to better performance and a more positive candidate experience, especially for candidates from underrepresented groups who may experience stereotype threat in technical evaluations.

In today's competitive market for AI talent, implementing these work samples will significantly improve your ability to identify candidates with the right blend of technical expertise, analytical thinking, and collaboration skills needed for AI Quality Assurance. By focusing on practical, job-relevant exercises rather than theoretical knowledge alone, you'll build a team capable of ensuring your AI systems are robust, reliable, and ready for real-world deployment.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. Learn more about the AI Quality Assurance Engineer role in our detailed job description.

Build Your Complete AI Quality Assurance Engineer Interview Guide

Sign up for a free Yardstick account to create a customized interview guide for your AI Quality Assurance Engineer role.