Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating Low-Code AI Tool Building Skills

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, the ability to build custom AI tools using low-code/no-code platforms has become an increasingly valuable skill. These platforms democratize AI development, allowing organizations to create sophisticated solutions without extensive coding expertise. However, identifying candidates who can effectively leverage these tools requires more than just reviewing resumes or conducting traditional interviews.

Work samples provide a window into a candidate's practical abilities, problem-solving approach, and technical fluency with low-code/no-code AI platforms. By observing candidates as they tackle realistic challenges, hiring managers can assess not only technical competence but also creativity, adaptability, and communication skills—all crucial for success in this domain.

The gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application is particularly pronounced in the low-code/no-code AI space. Many candidates may understand AI concepts or have experience with specific platforms, but the true test lies in their ability to translate business requirements into functional solutions efficiently. Work samples bridge this gap by requiring candidates to demonstrate their skills in action.

Furthermore, low-code/no-code AI development requires a unique blend of technical understanding, design thinking, and business acumen. The following exercises are designed to evaluate these multifaceted skills, providing a comprehensive assessment of a candidate's potential contribution to your organization's AI initiatives.

Activity #1: AI Solution Design Challenge

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to conceptualize and plan an AI solution using low-code/no-code tools. It tests their understanding of AI capabilities, platform selection, and solution architecture without requiring actual implementation. This planning phase is critical as it reveals how candidates approach problem definition, requirement gathering, and solution design—skills that directly impact project success.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a realistic business scenario that could benefit from an AI solution (e.g., customer service automation, data analysis, predictive maintenance).
• Create a brief that includes the business context, available data sources, key stakeholders, and desired outcomes.
• Provide access to information about 2-3 popular low-code/no-code AI platforms (e.g., Microsoft Power Platform, Google AppSheet, Bubble with AI integrations).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical evaluator and a business stakeholder present to assess both technical and business aspects of the solution.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the business scenario and available resources.
• Create a solution design document that includes:
• Problem statement and objectives
• Proposed AI approach and justification
• Selected low-code/no-code platform and rationale
• High-level architecture/workflow diagram
• Data requirements and sources
• Implementation timeline and potential challenges
• Success metrics
• Prepare to present your solution design in 10 minutes, followed by 5 minutes of questions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one strength of the solution design (e.g., "Your approach to data integration was particularly innovative").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might address potential data quality issues").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback and explain how they would incorporate these changes.

Activity #2: Rapid AI Prototype Development

This hands-on exercise assesses a candidate's ability to quickly implement a functional AI solution using a low-code/no-code platform. It evaluates technical proficiency, platform familiarity, and the ability to translate requirements into working features. This activity reveals how effectively candidates can leverage platform capabilities to deliver tangible results within time constraints.

Directions for the Company:

• Select a specific low-code/no-code AI platform that your organization uses or is considering (e.g., Microsoft Power Automate with AI Builder, Zapier with AI integrations).
• Prepare a simple but realistic use case (e.g., sentiment analysis of customer feedback, document classification, automated data extraction).
• Provide sample data relevant to the use case (10-20 records is sufficient).
• Ensure the necessary platform access and permissions are available.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical evaluator familiar with the platform available to assist with access issues.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Using the provided low-code/no-code platform, build a working prototype that addresses the given use case.
• The prototype should include:
• Data input mechanism
• AI processing component (using platform-provided AI capabilities)
• Output visualization or action
• Basic error handling
• Document any assumptions made during development.
• Prepare to demonstrate the working prototype and explain your implementation choices.
• Be ready to discuss how the solution could be expanded or improved with additional time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the demonstration, highlight one effective implementation choice the candidate made.
• Suggest one specific improvement to the prototype's functionality or design.
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement or explain how they would approach it if time doesn't permit actual implementation.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and their approach to iterative development.

Activity #3: AI Integration Challenge

This exercise focuses on the candidate's ability to connect AI tools with existing systems and data sources—a critical skill for creating practical, production-ready solutions. It tests knowledge of APIs, data transformation, and system integration within the constraints of low-code/no-code platforms, revealing how candidates approach the technical challenges of making AI tools work within a broader ecosystem.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario requiring integration between an AI component and external systems (e.g., connecting a sentiment analysis tool to a CRM system).
• Provide documentation for relevant APIs or connection points.
• Prepare sample data in common formats (CSV, JSON, etc.).
• If possible, set up sandbox environments for common systems (e.g., demo CRM instance).
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have technical support available to assist with access to systems or documentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the integration requirements and available resources.
• Using a low-code/no-code platform of your choice (or one specified by the company):
• Design the data flow between systems
• Implement the necessary connections and transformations
• Configure the AI processing component
• Demonstrate how data flows from source to destination with AI processing in between
• Document any challenges encountered and how they were addressed.
• Be prepared to explain your integration approach and any trade-offs made.
• Discuss how you would monitor and troubleshoot this integration in a production environment.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the integration that was particularly well-executed.
• Identify one area where the integration could be more robust or efficient.
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach to address the feedback and explain how the changes improve the solution.
• Evaluate their ability to think critically about integration challenges and adapt their approach based on feedback.

Activity #4: User-Centered AI Tool Design

This activity evaluates the candidate's ability to design AI tools with a focus on user experience and adoption. It tests their understanding of human-centered design principles applied to AI solutions, revealing how they balance technical capabilities with usability considerations—a key factor in the success of AI implementations.

Directions for the Company:

• Develop a scenario involving an AI tool that will be used by non-technical employees (e.g., AI-powered decision support tool for sales representatives).
• Create user personas representing the target users, including their technical comfort level, job responsibilities, and pain points.
• Provide any relevant brand guidelines or UX standards your organization follows.
• Prepare a list of common usability challenges with AI tools (e.g., trust issues, transparency concerns, learning curve).
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.
• Include a UX designer or product manager in the evaluation if possible.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario, user personas, and supporting materials.
• Using a low-code/no-code platform with UI capabilities (or wireframing tools if preferred):
• Design the user interface for the AI tool
• Create a user flow diagram showing how users will interact with the tool
• Identify key points where the AI's decision-making should be explained to users
• Design appropriate feedback mechanisms and error states
• Prepare to present your design, explaining how it addresses user needs while leveraging AI capabilities.
• Discuss how you would approach user testing and iteration of this design.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one aspect of the design that effectively addresses user needs or concerns.
• Suggest one improvement that would enhance usability or user adoption.
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to revise their design based on the feedback.
• Assess their ability to incorporate user-centered thinking and adapt their approach based on feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should we select which low-code/no-code platforms to use in these exercises?

Choose platforms that are either currently used in your organization or being considered for adoption. If you're platform-agnostic, select widely used options like Microsoft Power Platform, Google AppSheet, or Bubble with AI integrations. Consider allowing candidates to choose from a short list of platforms to accommodate their experience while still evaluating their adaptability.

What if a candidate has no experience with our specific low-code/no-code platform?

Focus on evaluating their approach to problem-solving and ability to learn quickly rather than specific platform knowledge. Consider providing a brief tutorial or documentation before the exercise. Remember that strong candidates with experience in similar platforms can typically transfer their skills effectively.

How should we handle time constraints for these exercises?

These exercises can be adapted to different timeframes. For shorter interviews, focus on design and planning activities rather than implementation. Alternatively, you could provide some exercises as take-home assignments with a reasonable time limit (2-3 hours maximum). Always be clear about time expectations and evaluate candidates based on what can reasonably be accomplished in the allotted time.

Should we provide access to AI services or mock them?

When possible, provide access to actual AI services through the low-code/no-code platforms. However, if this isn't feasible, you can simulate AI responses or provide sample outputs that candidates can incorporate into their solutions. Be clear about which parts are simulated so candidates understand the exercise parameters.

How do we evaluate candidates with different levels of experience?

Adjust your expectations based on the seniority of the role. For junior positions, focus more on problem-solving approach and willingness to learn. For senior roles, look for sophisticated solution design, consideration of scalability, and strategic thinking. Create a rubric with different criteria weightings based on the role level.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using screen sharing and collaborative tools. Ensure candidates have access to necessary platforms beforehand and consider extending time slightly to account for potential technical issues. Have a backup plan (like switching to a design-only exercise) if technical problems prevent platform access.

The ability to build custom AI tools using low-code/no-code platforms represents a significant competitive advantage for organizations seeking to leverage AI without extensive development resources. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you can identify candidates who not only understand AI concepts but can also apply them practically to solve business problems efficiently.

These exercises evaluate the full spectrum of skills needed for success: technical proficiency, problem-solving ability, design thinking, and communication skills. By observing candidates as they tackle realistic challenges, you gain insights that traditional interviews simply cannot provide.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for evaluating low-code/no-code AI development skills? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!