Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Skills in Financial Compliance

Financial compliance monitoring has undergone a revolutionary transformation with the integration of artificial intelligence. Organizations now rely on AI systems to detect patterns of suspicious activity, identify potential regulatory violations, and streamline compliance processes that once required enormous manual effort. However, finding candidates with the right blend of AI expertise and financial compliance knowledge presents a significant challenge for hiring managers.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field. While a candidate might eloquently discuss machine learning algorithms or financial regulations in theory, their ability to apply these concepts in real-world compliance scenarios remains untested. This gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application can lead to costly hiring mistakes.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually approach the complex challenges of AI-driven financial compliance. By observing candidates tackle realistic scenarios, hiring managers can evaluate their technical skills, domain knowledge, regulatory understanding, and problem-solving approaches simultaneously. These exercises reveal not just what candidates know, but how they apply that knowledge under conditions similar to those they'll face on the job.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate candidates for roles involving AI in financial compliance monitoring. Each exercise targets different aspects of the role, from technical model evaluation to stakeholder communication. By implementing these exercises in your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into which candidates possess the rare combination of skills needed to excel in this specialized field.

Activity #1: Anomaly Detection Model Evaluation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to evaluate and improve an AI model used for detecting suspicious financial transactions. Financial compliance professionals must be able to critically analyze model performance, identify weaknesses, and recommend improvements while understanding the regulatory implications of false positives and negatives. This activity reveals the candidate's technical depth, analytical thinking, and compliance awareness.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified dataset of financial transactions (300-500 rows) with features like transaction amount, time, frequency, customer risk score, etc. Include some labeled anomalies.
• Provide documentation for a basic anomaly detection model that has been applied to this data, including its methodology, performance metrics, and known limitations.
• Include regulatory context about the compliance requirements this model addresses (e.g., AML, fraud detection).
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Conduct this exercise in a controlled environment where the candidate has access to Python/R and basic data analysis libraries.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided transaction dataset and the documentation for the current anomaly detection model.
• Evaluate the model's performance using appropriate metrics, considering both technical performance and regulatory compliance implications.
• Identify at least three specific weaknesses in the current model approach.
• Propose concrete improvements to address these weaknesses, explaining how they would enhance both detection capability and regulatory compliance.
• Prepare a brief (5-minute) presentation of your findings and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., thorough analysis of false negatives) and one area for improvement (e.g., consideration of model explainability for regulatory purposes).
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their recommendations based on the feedback, particularly focusing on how they would address the improvement area.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their thinking.

Activity #2: Compliance AI Implementation Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to plan the implementation of an AI system for financial compliance monitoring. Success in this field requires not just technical knowledge but also strategic thinking about how AI systems integrate with existing compliance frameworks. This activity reveals the candidate's project planning skills, understanding of implementation challenges, and awareness of regulatory considerations.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a fictional financial institution profile with details about size, current compliance processes, regulatory obligations, and technical infrastructure.
• Outline a compliance challenge the institution faces (e.g., scaling transaction monitoring, reducing false positives while maintaining regulatory coverage).
• Provide a basic requirements document for an AI compliance monitoring system to address this challenge.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide whiteboard or digital diagramming tools.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the financial institution profile and compliance challenge.
• Develop an implementation plan for the AI compliance monitoring system that includes:
• Key phases and timeline
• Required resources (technical, human, data)
• Integration points with existing systems
• Model validation approach
• Regulatory considerations and documentation
• Risk mitigation strategies
• Create a visual representation of your implementation approach (flowchart, timeline, or other appropriate format).
• Prepare to present your plan in 10 minutes, highlighting critical success factors and potential obstacles.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength (e.g., comprehensive consideration of data governance) and one area for improvement (e.g., more detailed approach to model validation).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising the section of their plan related to the improvement area.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and strengthen their planning approach.

Activity #3: Explaining AI Compliance Findings to Stakeholders

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to communicate complex AI compliance findings to non-technical stakeholders. In financial compliance, AI professionals must translate technical results into actionable insights for compliance officers, executives, and regulators. This activity reveals the candidate's communication skills, stakeholder awareness, and ability to balance technical accuracy with accessibility.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a technical report showing the results of an AI compliance monitoring system, including:
• Model performance metrics
• Detected patterns of suspicious activity
• False positive rates and examples
• Technical limitations and edge cases
• Create profiles for three stakeholders: a compliance officer, a C-suite executive, and a regulatory examiner.
• Allow 45 minutes for preparation.
• Conduct a 15-minute role-play where an interviewer plays each stakeholder role.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the technical report on the AI compliance monitoring system.
• Prepare three different explanations of the findings tailored to each stakeholder:
• For the compliance officer: Focus on operational implications and case management
• For the C-suite executive: Focus on risk exposure, efficiency gains, and resource implications
• For the regulatory examiner: Focus on model governance, validation, and regulatory compliance
• During the role-play, present your explanations to each stakeholder and answer their questions.
• Demonstrate your ability to adjust your communication style and content based on the stakeholder's needs and questions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., effective use of analogies to explain complex concepts) and one area for improvement (e.g., better addressing the regulatory examiner's concerns about model transparency).
• Ask the candidate to revise and deliver their explanation to the stakeholder where improvement was needed.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and adapt their communication approach.

Activity #4: Resolving an AI Compliance Edge Case

This exercise evaluates a candidate's problem-solving abilities when faced with a complex edge case in AI-driven compliance monitoring. Financial compliance professionals must be able to analyze unusual situations where AI systems may not perform as expected and develop appropriate solutions that maintain regulatory compliance. This activity reveals the candidate's critical thinking, regulatory knowledge, and practical problem-solving approach.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario describing an edge case where an AI compliance monitoring system has produced ambiguous or potentially incorrect results for a specific financial activity.
• Include relevant contextual information such as:
• Description of the unusual transaction patterns
• The AI system's assessment and confidence level
• Available customer information
• Applicable regulatory requirements
• Time constraints for resolution
• Allow 45 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide access to relevant regulatory guidance documents.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the edge case scenario and supporting materials.
• Analyze why the AI system might be struggling with this particular case.
• Develop a structured approach to resolve the situation that:
• Determines whether the case represents genuine suspicious activity
• Identifies what additional information or analysis is needed
• Outlines immediate actions to ensure regulatory compliance
• Recommends longer-term improvements to the AI system
• Document your analysis and recommendations in a format suitable for both technical and compliance teams.
• Prepare to explain your reasoning and approach in a 10-minute presentation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength (e.g., thorough consideration of regulatory implications) and one area for improvement (e.g., more systematic approach to gathering additional information).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising their approach based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and refine their problem-solving approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical AI knowledge should candidates have for these exercises?

Candidates should have sufficient technical knowledge to evaluate model performance, understand limitations, and recommend improvements. However, the focus should be on applying AI in the financial compliance context rather than deep expertise in cutting-edge AI research. Look for candidates who understand both the technical and regulatory dimensions of AI in compliance.

Should we customize these exercises for different seniority levels?

Yes, adjust expectations based on seniority. For junior roles, focus more on technical execution and basic understanding of compliance requirements. For senior roles, emphasize strategic thinking, implementation planning, and the ability to navigate complex regulatory considerations. The exercises themselves can remain similar, but evaluation criteria should reflect the expected level of expertise.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose approaches different from our current methods?

Novel approaches should be evaluated on their merit rather than conformity to existing methods. The key is whether the candidate can justify their approach with sound reasoning that addresses both technical effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Different perspectives can be valuable for improving AI compliance systems, provided they're well-reasoned and compliance-focused.

What if candidates don't have specific experience with the regulations mentioned in these exercises?

Focus on evaluating their ability to understand and apply regulatory principles rather than specific regulatory knowledge. Candidates with strong analytical skills and compliance mindsets can quickly learn specific regulations. Look for those who ask intelligent questions about regulatory requirements and consider compliance implications in their solutions, even if they're not familiar with every detail.

How can we make these exercises fair for candidates from different backgrounds?

Provide sufficient context and background information so candidates without specific financial industry experience can still demonstrate their abilities. Evaluate candidates on their problem-solving approach and learning agility rather than prior knowledge alone. Consider providing pre-reading materials 24-48 hours before the exercise to level the playing field.

Should we conduct these exercises remotely or in-person?

Both approaches can work, but ensure the environment supports fair evaluation. For remote exercises, use collaborative tools that allow you to observe the candidate's process. For in-person exercises, provide a comfortable workspace with necessary resources. The key is consistency across candidates and creating conditions that allow them to demonstrate their capabilities.

The integration of AI into financial compliance monitoring represents a significant opportunity for financial institutions to enhance their regulatory compliance while improving efficiency. However, realizing these benefits requires professionals with specialized skills at the intersection of artificial intelligence and financial regulation. By incorporating these work sample exercises into your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can successfully navigate this complex domain.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, explore Yardstick's tools for creating AI-powered job descriptions, generating effective interview questions, and developing comprehensive interview guides.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for AI in Financial Compliance roles? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!