Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Scaling Expertise

Scaling AI solutions represents one of the most critical challenges organizations face when moving from proof-of-concept to enterprise-wide implementation. As AI systems grow in complexity and usage, the ability to effectively scale these solutions becomes a fundamental skill for technical teams. The difference between a successful AI implementation and a failed one often comes down to how well the team can address scaling challenges.

Evaluating a candidate's ability to scale AI solutions requires more than just reviewing their resume or asking theoretical questions. Practical work samples provide tangible evidence of a candidate's problem-solving approach, technical knowledge, and strategic thinking when faced with real-world scaling scenarios. These exercises reveal how candidates balance technical requirements with business needs, a crucial skill for successful AI implementation.

The complexity of scaling AI solutions spans multiple domains - from infrastructure and model optimization to deployment strategies and organizational adoption. Through carefully designed work samples, you can assess a candidate's proficiency across these domains and identify those who truly understand the multifaceted nature of AI scaling challenges.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate candidates on their ability to plan, implement, troubleshoot, and communicate AI scaling strategies. By observing how candidates approach these realistic scenarios, you'll gain valuable insights into their technical capabilities, strategic thinking, and problem-solving methodologies - all essential qualities for professionals responsible for scaling AI solutions in your organization.

Activity #1: AI System Scaling Strategy

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop a comprehensive strategy for scaling an AI solution across an organization. It tests their understanding of both technical infrastructure requirements and organizational considerations when moving from a pilot to a full-scale deployment. Candidates must demonstrate strategic thinking, technical knowledge, and awareness of potential challenges in AI scaling.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a detailed scenario of a successful AI pilot that needs to be scaled enterprise-wide. For example: "Your company has successfully piloted a customer service chatbot that has reduced response times by 40% in one department. Now, leadership wants to deploy this solution across all customer-facing departments globally."
• Include relevant details about the current infrastructure, model architecture, data volumes, and organizational structure.
• Allow candidates 30-45 minutes to develop their scaling strategy.
• Provide access to a whiteboard or digital drawing tool for creating diagrams.
• Have a technical leader with AI experience evaluate the response.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and develop a comprehensive strategy for scaling the AI solution.
• Create a phased implementation plan that addresses technical infrastructure, model training/serving, data pipeline scaling, and organizational adoption.
• Identify potential bottlenecks and challenges in the scaling process and propose solutions.
• Outline key metrics to track during the scaling process to ensure success.
• Be prepared to present and defend your strategy to the interviewer.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on one strength of the candidate's scaling strategy (e.g., "Your approach to gradually increasing model complexity as you scale was well-thought-out").
• The interviewer should also provide one area for improvement (e.g., "Your strategy didn't fully address how to handle data privacy concerns across different regions").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.

Activity #2: Model Optimization for Scale

This exercise tests a candidate's technical ability to optimize AI models for performance at scale. It evaluates their understanding of model architecture, optimization techniques, and deployment strategies that enable efficient scaling. This activity reveals how candidates balance model accuracy with computational efficiency, a critical skill for scaling AI solutions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario involving a machine learning model that performs well on a small scale but faces performance issues when deployed more broadly.
• Provide pseudocode or actual code (depending on the role's requirements) of the current model implementation.
• Include performance metrics showing where the model is struggling (e.g., inference latency, memory usage, throughput limitations).
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical AI engineer or ML engineer available to evaluate the technical aspects of the solution.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided model implementation and performance metrics to identify bottlenecks.
• Propose specific optimization techniques to improve the model's scalability while maintaining acceptable accuracy.
• Consider techniques such as model quantization, distillation, pruning, or architectural changes.
• Explain how you would implement these optimizations and what trade-offs they involve.
• Outline how you would validate that your optimizations maintain the required model performance while improving scalability.
• Modify the provided code/pseudocode to demonstrate your optimization approach.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one effective optimization technique the candidate proposed (e.g., "Your approach to model quantization was particularly well-reasoned").
• The interviewer should also identify one area where the optimization strategy could be improved (e.g., "Your solution might create challenges for model retraining").
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to refine their approach based on the feedback, specifically addressing the improvement area.

Activity #3: AI Infrastructure Scaling Troubleshooting

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to diagnose and resolve infrastructure issues that emerge when scaling AI systems. It tests their understanding of distributed computing, resource management, and system architecture in the context of AI workloads. This activity reveals how candidates approach complex technical problems under pressure.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario of an AI system experiencing performance degradation after scaling to handle increased load.
• Provide system logs, error messages, and performance metrics that contain clues about the underlying issues.
• Include a diagram of the current infrastructure setup (e.g., showing model serving infrastructure, data pipelines, etc.).
• Allocate 30-45 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member familiar with AI infrastructure available to evaluate the response.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided logs, metrics, and infrastructure diagram to identify potential causes of the performance issues.
• Develop a systematic troubleshooting approach to isolate the root causes.
• Propose immediate mitigation strategies to restore system performance.
• Recommend long-term architectural changes to prevent similar issues in the future.
• Prioritize your recommendations based on impact and implementation effort.
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning and defend your approach.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should acknowledge one strength in the candidate's troubleshooting approach (e.g., "Your systematic elimination of potential causes was very effective").
• The interviewer should also identify one area for improvement (e.g., "You might have overlooked the network latency between services as a contributing factor").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback, specifically addressing how they would incorporate the improvement suggestion.

Activity #4: Cross-Functional AI Scaling Communication

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to communicate complex technical scaling decisions to non-technical stakeholders. It evaluates their skill in translating technical concepts into business value and building organizational buy-in for scaling strategies. This activity reveals how candidates bridge the gap between technical implementation and business objectives.

Directions for the Company:

• Develop a scenario where the candidate must explain a complex AI scaling decision to a cross-functional team of stakeholders.
• Provide details about the technical decision (e.g., moving from on-premise to cloud infrastructure for AI workloads, implementing a new model serving architecture, etc.).
• Include profiles of the stakeholders (e.g., CFO concerned about costs, CMO interested in customer impact, CIO worried about integration with existing systems).
• Allocate 20-30 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for the presentation/discussion.
• Have both technical and non-technical evaluators present if possible.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the technical decision and stakeholder profiles.
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-10 minutes) explaining the scaling decision, focusing on:
• The business rationale behind the technical changes
• How the scaling approach addresses specific stakeholder concerns
• Expected benefits and potential risks
• Implementation timeline and resource requirements
• Success metrics that align with business objectives
• Be prepared to answer questions from different stakeholder perspectives.
• Create any visual aids that would help communicate your message effectively.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one aspect of the communication that was particularly effective (e.g., "Your explanation of the cost structure was very clear and addressed the CFO's concerns well").
• The interviewer should also identify one area where the communication could be improved (e.g., "The technical implementation timeline wasn't connected clearly to business outcomes").
• Allow the candidate 5-10 minutes to refine their communication approach based on the feedback, specifically addressing how they would improve the identified area.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each of these exercises take in an interview process?

Each exercise is designed to take between 30-60 minutes, depending on the complexity and depth you want to explore. For senior roles, you might want to allocate more time to allow for deeper discussion. You can also select just one or two exercises rather than using all four in your interview process.

Should these exercises be conducted in-person or remotely?

These exercises can be effective in both in-person and remote settings. For remote interviews, ensure you have collaborative tools available (digital whiteboards, screen sharing, etc.) to facilitate the exercises. The AI Infrastructure Troubleshooting exercise, in particular, works well in a remote setting where candidates can analyze logs and diagrams on their own screen.

How technical should we expect the candidates to be in their responses?

The expected level of technical detail should align with the seniority and specific requirements of the role. For more senior positions, look for depth in both technical implementation details and strategic considerations. For roles focused on implementation, you might place more emphasis on the Model Optimization and Infrastructure Troubleshooting exercises.

Can we modify these exercises for different types of AI applications?

Absolutely! These exercises should be customized to reflect the specific AI applications relevant to your organization. For example, if your company focuses on computer vision, you might adapt the Model Optimization exercise to address scaling challenges specific to image processing models. The more relevant you make these exercises to your actual work, the more valuable insights you'll gain.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose solutions different from our current approach?

Different approaches should be evaluated on their merit rather than how closely they match your current methods. Look for sound reasoning, awareness of trade-offs, and adaptability in the candidate's thinking. Sometimes, candidates with fresh perspectives can bring valuable innovations to your scaling strategies. The key is to assess whether their approach is well-reasoned and addresses the core challenges of scaling AI solutions.

Should we provide candidates with these exercises in advance?

For the more complex exercises like the AI System Scaling Strategy or Model Optimization, providing some basic information 24-48 hours in advance can lead to more thoughtful responses. However, the Infrastructure Troubleshooting exercise is often more valuable as an on-the-spot assessment of problem-solving abilities. The communication exercise can work well either way, depending on whether you're evaluating preparation skills or adaptability.

Scaling AI solutions requires a unique blend of technical expertise, strategic thinking, and communication skills. By incorporating these work sample exercises into your interview process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can successfully navigate the complex challenges of moving AI from proof-of-concept to enterprise-scale implementation. These exercises provide a window into how candidates approach real-world scaling problems, helping you build a team capable of delivering AI solutions that create lasting business value.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for evaluating AI scaling expertise by signing up for a free Yardstick account here