Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Model Deployment Skills

AI model deployment is a critical phase in the machine learning lifecycle, bridging the gap between experimental models and business value. Organizations increasingly recognize that the ability to efficiently deploy models to production is as important as model development itself. While many data scientists excel at building sophisticated algorithms, the skills required to operationalize these models in production environments are distinct and equally valuable.

Evaluating a candidate's proficiency in AI model deployment requires more than theoretical knowledge assessment. The complexities of production environments—including scalability, monitoring, security, and integration with existing systems—demand practical experience that can't be adequately assessed through traditional interviews alone. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world deployment challenges, revealing their technical capabilities and problem-solving methodologies.

These exercises simulate the multifaceted nature of production AI systems, requiring candidates to demonstrate competence across the deployment pipeline—from containerization and orchestration to monitoring and maintenance. By observing candidates tackle these realistic scenarios, hiring managers can better predict how they'll perform when faced with the organization's actual deployment challenges.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to not only implement technical solutions but also to communicate their approach, anticipate potential issues, and adapt to feedback—all crucial skills for successfully deploying AI models in production. These exercises will help you identify candidates who can bridge the gap between data science innovation and operational excellence.

Activity #1: Containerized Model Deployment Pipeline

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design and implement a containerized deployment pipeline for an AI model. Containerization is fundamental to modern ML deployment practices, enabling consistency across environments and simplifying deployment workflows. This activity assesses technical skills in Docker, orchestration tools, and CI/CD concepts while revealing how candidates approach the end-to-end deployment process.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a pre-trained machine learning model (e.g., a simple classification model saved as a pickle file or in a standard format like ONNX).
• Include a basic Flask or FastAPI application skeleton that needs to be completed to serve the model.
• Supply a requirements.txt file with necessary dependencies.
• Prepare a document outlining the deployment requirements: the model should be containerized, expose a REST API, and include basic logging.
• Allow candidates to use their preferred containerization tools (Docker, Podman, etc.).
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Create a Dockerfile to containerize the provided model and API application.
• Complete the API code to load the model and create endpoints for predictions.
• Implement basic logging for model inputs and predictions.
• Write a brief deployment guide explaining how to build and run the container.
• Include a simple CI/CD configuration file (e.g., GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) that would automate the build and deployment process.
• Be prepared to explain your design choices and discuss potential improvements for a production environment.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the solution, provide feedback on one aspect the candidate handled well (e.g., efficient Dockerfile, well-structured API code) and one area for improvement (e.g., security considerations, logging enhancements).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10-15 minutes implementing the suggested improvement or explaining how they would approach it.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and their ability to quickly iterate on their solution.

Activity #2: Model Monitoring and Drift Detection

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to implement monitoring for deployed AI models—a critical skill for maintaining model performance in production. It evaluates their understanding of data drift, model decay, and the metrics necessary to detect when retraining is needed. This activity reveals how candidates approach the operational aspects of AI systems beyond initial deployment.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a dataset representing historical model inputs and outputs, along with a more recent dataset showing potential drift.
• Include a deployed model (or mock interface) that the monitoring system will track.
• Supply basic visualization libraries and tools (matplotlib, pandas, etc.).
• Prepare a document outlining the monitoring requirements: detect data drift, track prediction distribution changes, and set up alerting thresholds.
• Allow candidates to use their preferred monitoring approach or suggest common frameworks.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide access to documentation for any suggested monitoring tools.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the historical and recent datasets to identify potential drift patterns.
• Implement monitoring code that calculates relevant drift metrics (e.g., KL divergence, population stability index).
• Create a dashboard or visualization showing key monitoring metrics.
• Define appropriate thresholds for alerts based on the data analysis.
• Document how the monitoring system would integrate with the production environment.
• Explain how you would handle detected drift (retraining triggers, fallback strategies, etc.).
• Be prepared to discuss how your monitoring approach would scale with multiple models.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength in their monitoring approach (e.g., comprehensive metrics, thoughtful visualization) and one area for improvement (e.g., threshold selection, scalability considerations).
• Ask the candidate to refine their alert thresholds or add an additional monitoring metric based on your feedback.
• Evaluate their understanding of the tradeoffs in monitoring design and their ability to adapt their approach.

Activity #3: Production Troubleshooting Scenario

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to diagnose and resolve issues in a production AI system—an essential skill for maintaining reliable ML services. It assesses technical debugging skills, systematic problem-solving approaches, and the ability to communicate effectively during incidents. This activity reveals how candidates perform under pressure while maintaining a methodical approach to complex problems.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario description of a production ML system experiencing issues (e.g., increased latency, prediction errors, resource consumption spikes).
• Provide system logs, metrics dashboards, and error messages that contain clues to the underlying problems.
• Include a system architecture diagram showing the components of the ML pipeline.
• Prepare 2-3 deliberate issues for the candidate to find (e.g., memory leak in preprocessing, model version mismatch, resource contention).
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer role-play as a team member who can provide additional information if asked specific questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and provided materials to understand the production issue.
• Analyze the logs, metrics, and error messages to identify potential causes.
• Document your troubleshooting process, including what you're checking and why.
• Propose a diagnosis for each issue you identify.
• Recommend immediate mitigation steps to restore service.
• Suggest longer-term fixes to prevent similar issues in the future.
• Prepare a brief incident report summarizing your findings and recommendations.
• Be ready to explain your reasoning and discuss alternative approaches.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength in their troubleshooting approach (e.g., systematic analysis, insightful diagnosis) and one area for improvement (e.g., overlooked evidence, incomplete mitigation plan).
• Ask the candidate to refine their incident report based on the feedback, particularly focusing on the improvement area.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and their communication skills when explaining technical issues.

Activity #4: Scalable Model Serving Architecture Design

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design scalable architectures for serving AI models in high-demand production environments. It evaluates their understanding of distributed systems, performance optimization, and cloud infrastructure. This activity reveals how candidates approach architectural decisions that balance performance, cost, reliability, and maintainability.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a scenario describing a growing business need (e.g., a recommendation system that needs to scale from thousands to millions of predictions daily).
• Include current architecture documentation and performance metrics showing bottlenecks.
• Supply information about available infrastructure options (on-premises, cloud providers, etc.).
• Define key requirements: latency targets, throughput needs, budget constraints, and reliability expectations.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare whiteboarding tools or diagramming software for the candidate's use.
• Have a technical interviewer available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a scalable architecture for serving the AI models described in the scenario.
• Create a system diagram showing key components, data flows, and scaling mechanisms.
• Explain how your design addresses the current bottlenecks and meets the defined requirements.
• Include specific technologies and services you would use and justify your choices.
• Describe how you would implement horizontal and/or vertical scaling.
• Outline a migration plan from the current architecture to your proposed solution.
• Discuss monitoring, failover, and disaster recovery considerations.
• Prepare to present your design in a 15-minute walkthrough, highlighting key decisions and tradeoffs.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength of their architectural design (e.g., elegant scaling approach, thoughtful technology choices) and one area for improvement (e.g., cost considerations, potential single points of failure).
• Ask the candidate to revise one aspect of their design based on your feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to defend their design decisions while remaining open to alternative approaches.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 60-90 minutes, though the troubleshooting scenario can be shorter (45-60 minutes). For remote candidates, consider sending the exercise in advance with a time limit. For on-site interviews, these exercises can be integrated into a half-day interview process. The feedback and iteration portion should be included in this time allocation.

Should we use our actual production models for these exercises?

No, it's best to create simplified versions that represent similar challenges without exposing proprietary information. Use open-source models or create synthetic examples that test the same skills. The focus should be on the deployment process rather than the model itself.

How technical should the interviewer be for these exercises?

The interviewer should have sufficient technical knowledge to evaluate the candidate's approach and provide meaningful feedback. Ideally, they should be familiar with ML deployment practices and the specific technologies mentioned in the candidate's solution. For the troubleshooting exercise, the interviewer needs to understand the deliberate issues planted in the scenario.

Can these exercises be adapted for different levels of seniority?

Yes, these exercises can be scaled by adjusting expectations and complexity. For junior roles, focus on basic implementation and understanding of concepts. For senior roles, emphasize architectural decisions, scalability considerations, and business impact. You can also adjust time constraints or add requirements for more senior positions.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different technologies than our stack?

Focus on the underlying principles and approaches rather than specific technology choices. A candidate who demonstrates strong fundamentals in a different stack can likely transfer those skills. Look for sound reasoning behind their technology choices and an understanding of tradeoffs. Consider asking how they would approach the problem using your stack as a follow-up question.

Should candidates be allowed to use external resources during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, Stack Overflow, and other resources more accurately simulates real-world working conditions. This approach tests a candidate's ability to efficiently find and apply information rather than memorization. However, be clear about expectations regarding original work versus copied solutions.

AI model deployment is a multifaceted discipline requiring both technical depth and operational awareness. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain valuable insights into how candidates approach the real-world challenges of bringing AI models to production. Remember that the goal is not just to assess technical skills but also to evaluate problem-solving approaches, communication abilities, and adaptability—all crucial for success in the dynamic field of MLOps.

For more resources to enhance your AI hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of tools, including our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for AI model deployment roles? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!