Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI-Driven Anomaly Detection Skills

AI-driven anomaly detection has become a critical capability across industries, from cybersecurity and fraud prevention to manufacturing quality control and network monitoring. Organizations increasingly rely on sophisticated algorithms to identify unusual patterns that may indicate threats, opportunities, or system failures. However, finding candidates with the right combination of technical skills, analytical thinking, and domain understanding can be challenging.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in implementing anomaly detection solutions. While candidates may discuss theoretical knowledge or past projects, these conversations don't necessarily demonstrate their ability to approach new problems, select appropriate techniques, or implement effective solutions. This gap between interview performance and job requirements can lead to costly hiring mistakes.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually approach anomaly detection challenges. By observing candidates as they explore data, select models, implement solutions, and interpret results, hiring teams can gain valuable insights into their technical abilities, problem-solving approaches, and communication skills. These exercises reveal not just what candidates know, but how they apply that knowledge in realistic scenarios.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate the full spectrum of skills required for AI-driven anomaly detection. From data exploration and algorithm selection to implementation and result interpretation, these exercises will help you identify candidates who can deliver value through anomaly detection in your specific context. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can successfully implement anomaly detection solutions that drive business value.

Activity #1: Data Exploration and Anomaly Detection Strategy

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to explore unfamiliar data, identify potential anomalies, and develop a strategic approach to anomaly detection. Strong candidates will demonstrate methodical data exploration skills, identify appropriate techniques based on data characteristics, and communicate their strategy clearly. This exercise reveals how candidates think about anomaly detection problems before diving into implementation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a dataset with known anomalies (e.g., network traffic logs, transaction data, sensor readings, or user behavior data).
• Include a brief description of the data context and the business problem (e.g., "This dataset contains server metrics collected over 30 days. The business needs to identify unusual server behavior that might indicate performance issues or security breaches.").
• Provide access to the dataset in a common format (CSV, JSON) and basic documentation of the fields.
• Allow candidates to use their preferred tools for data exploration (Python, R, etc.).
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Explore the provided dataset to understand its structure, variables, and basic statistics.
• Identify potential anomalies through visual exploration and basic statistical analysis.
• Develop a strategic approach for implementing an anomaly detection system, including:
• Recommended preprocessing steps
• Potential algorithms or techniques to try, with justification
• Evaluation metrics you would use
• Implementation considerations and challenges
• Prepare a brief (5-10 minute) presentation of your findings and strategy.
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning and answer questions about alternative approaches.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the candidate's approach (e.g., thorough data exploration, appropriate algorithm selection).
• Provide one area for improvement (e.g., consideration of computational efficiency, handling of specific data characteristics).
• Ask the candidate to revise one aspect of their strategy based on the feedback and explain how this revision would improve the solution.

Activity #2: Implementing an Anomaly Detection Algorithm

This hands-on coding exercise assesses a candidate's ability to implement an anomaly detection solution from scratch. It evaluates technical coding skills, algorithm understanding, and the ability to translate a conceptual approach into working code. This exercise reveals whether candidates can move beyond theoretical knowledge to practical implementation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a clean, preprocessed dataset suitable for anomaly detection (time series data, transaction data, etc.).
• Create a Jupyter notebook or coding environment with basic starter code and clear instructions.
• Include any necessary libraries pre-installed (scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc.).
• Provide clear evaluation criteria focusing on code quality, algorithm implementation, and results interpretation.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided dataset and problem description.
• Implement at least one appropriate anomaly detection algorithm from scratch (not just calling a library function).
• Options include:
• Statistical approaches (Z-score, DBSCAN, Isolation Forest)
• Time series methods (if appropriate for the data)
• Deep learning approaches (autoencoders)
• Your implementation should:
• Include appropriate data preprocessing
• Implement the core algorithm logic
• Identify and flag potential anomalies
• Visualize the results
• Document your code with comments explaining your approach and key decisions.
• Be prepared to explain how your implementation works and why you made specific choices.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the code with the candidate, highlighting one aspect that was particularly well implemented.
• Identify one area where the implementation could be improved (efficiency, robustness, etc.).
• Ask the candidate to refactor or enhance that specific portion of the code based on your feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and their ability to quickly improve their solution.

Activity #3: Model Evaluation and Explanation

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to evaluate anomaly detection models and communicate technical findings to stakeholders. It assesses critical thinking about model performance, understanding of evaluation metrics specific to anomaly detection, and the ability to translate technical concepts into business value. This skill is crucial for ensuring anomaly detection systems deliver actionable insights.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare results from 2-3 different anomaly detection models applied to the same dataset.
• Include performance metrics (precision, recall, F1-score, AUC-ROC) and visualizations of detected anomalies.
• Provide context about the business problem and why detecting these anomalies matters.
• Create a scenario where the candidate needs to recommend one approach to stakeholders.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the performance results of multiple anomaly detection models.
• Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each approach based on:
• Performance metrics
• Types of anomalies successfully detected
• False positive/negative patterns
• Computational requirements
• Explainability of results
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-10 slides or equivalent) that:
• Compares the models in terms stakeholders can understand
• Recommends a specific approach with justification
• Explains the business impact of your recommendation
• Addresses potential limitations and how to mitigate them
• Be prepared to answer questions about your evaluation methodology and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, highlight one aspect of the candidate's analysis that was particularly insightful.
• Provide constructive feedback on one area where their explanation could be more effective or their analysis more thorough.
• Ask the candidate to revise their recommendation based on a new stakeholder concern you introduce (e.g., "The engineering team is concerned about computational resources" or "The compliance team needs more explainable results").
• Evaluate how well they adapt their recommendation while maintaining analytical rigor.

Activity #4: Real-World Anomaly Detection Challenge

This comprehensive exercise simulates a real-world anomaly detection project with messy data, unclear patterns, and business constraints. It evaluates a candidate's end-to-end problem-solving abilities, from data cleaning to solution implementation and result interpretation. This exercise reveals how candidates handle ambiguity and constraints while delivering practical solutions.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a realistic, messy dataset with missing values, outliers, and various data types.
• Include a business scenario with specific constraints (e.g., "We need to detect fraudulent transactions in near real-time with minimal false positives").
• Provide any relevant domain context that would help with feature engineering.
• Consider making this a take-home exercise with a 2-4 hour expected completion time.
• Prepare evaluation criteria that balance technical implementation with business value.

Directions for the Candidate:

• You've been given a dataset representing [specific domain context, e.g., customer transactions, network traffic, manufacturing sensor data].
• Your task is to build an end-to-end anomaly detection solution that:
• Handles data cleaning and preprocessing challenges
• Implements appropriate anomaly detection technique(s)
• Balances detection accuracy with business constraints
• Provides actionable insights from detected anomalies
• Deliverables should include:
• Documented code for your solution
• A brief report (2-3 pages) explaining your approach, results, and recommendations
• Visualizations that help communicate your findings
• Focus on creating a practical solution that could be implemented in production, not just a proof of concept.
• Be prepared to discuss trade-offs in your approach and how you would iterate on your solution.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the solution with the candidate, highlighting one particularly effective aspect of their approach.
• Provide constructive feedback on one area where their solution could be enhanced.
• Present a new business requirement or data challenge (e.g., "We now need the system to adapt to seasonal patterns" or "We've discovered the data contains systematic errors from one data source").
• Ask the candidate to explain how they would modify their solution to address this new challenge.
• Evaluate their ability to think on their feet and adapt their approach while maintaining solution integrity.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

The time required varies by exercise. Activity #1 and #3 typically take 1-2 hours including preparation and presentation. Activity #2 requires 60-90 minutes of focused coding time. Activity #4 works best as a take-home exercise with 2-4 hours of expected effort. Consider your candidates' time constraints and select exercises that provide the most insight for your specific role.

Should we use our actual company data for these exercises?

While using relevant data increases exercise authenticity, using actual production data may raise confidentiality concerns. Consider creating synthetic datasets that mimic your data characteristics or using anonymized/modified versions of real data. Public datasets related to your domain can also be effective alternatives.

How technical should the interviewer be to evaluate these exercises?

The interviewer should have sufficient technical knowledge to evaluate algorithm selection, implementation quality, and result interpretation. For Activity #3 (Model Evaluation), a business stakeholder can participate alongside a technical evaluator. If you lack internal expertise, consider involving a technical consultant in the interview process.

Can these exercises be adapted for junior candidates with less experience?

Yes, these exercises can be modified for different experience levels. For junior candidates, provide more structure in Activities #1 and #2, focus on implementing established algorithms rather than designing novel approaches, and evaluate their learning potential and fundamentals rather than advanced techniques. Activity #4 can be simplified to focus on a narrower aspect of the anomaly detection pipeline.

How should we weight these exercises compared to traditional interviews?

Work samples typically provide stronger signals about on-the-job performance than traditional interviews. Consider giving these exercises 50-60% weight in your evaluation, with traditional interviews assessing cultural fit, communication skills, and broader technical knowledge. The specific weighting should align with your organization's priorities and the role's requirements.

What if a candidate performs well in some exercises but poorly in others?

Different exercises evaluate different skill dimensions. A candidate excelling at implementation but struggling with communication might be appropriate for a research-focused role but less suitable for a client-facing position. Map exercise performance to your specific role requirements and consider whether weaknesses in certain areas can be developed or complemented by team strengths.

AI-driven anomaly detection requires a unique combination of technical skills, analytical thinking, and domain understanding. By incorporating these work sample exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide. Remember that the goal isn't to find candidates who execute these specific exercises perfectly, but to identify those who demonstrate the problem-solving approaches, technical abilities, and communication skills needed to implement effective anomaly detection solutions in your specific context.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI-Driven Anomaly Detection by signing up for a free Yardstick account