Essential Work Sample Exercises for AI Employee Training Recommendation Specialists

Implementing AI for personalized employee training recommendations represents a significant advancement in corporate learning and development. Organizations that leverage AI to match employees with the right training resources can dramatically improve skill development, engagement, and overall workforce capabilities. However, finding candidates who truly understand both the technical aspects of AI recommendation systems and the nuances of employee development can be challenging.

The intersection of artificial intelligence and learning & development requires a unique blend of technical expertise, data analysis skills, and understanding of human learning patterns. Candidates must demonstrate their ability to design systems that not only function technically but also deliver meaningful, personalized learning experiences that align with both individual career goals and organizational objectives.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world challenges in this specialized field. By observing how potential hires design recommendation algorithms, analyze training data, communicate with stakeholders, and troubleshoot existing systems, hiring managers can make more informed decisions about which candidates will truly excel in this multifaceted role.

The following four exercises are designed to evaluate candidates' capabilities across the essential skill domains required for AI-powered training recommendation systems. These activities simulate authentic workplace scenarios and provide opportunities for candidates to demonstrate both their technical proficiency and their understanding of learning science principles that underpin effective personalization.

Activity #1: AI Training Recommendation System Design

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to conceptualize and plan an AI-based recommendation system for employee training. It evaluates their understanding of recommendation algorithms, data requirements, and how to align technical capabilities with learning and development goals. This foundational skill is critical as it demonstrates whether candidates can translate business needs into technical specifications while considering practical implementation constraints.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a fictional company scenario including: industry, number of employees, current training catalog size (e.g., 200+ courses), and 2-3 specific business goals (e.g., improving technical skills, reducing compliance violations).
• Include information about available data sources (e.g., employee profiles, past training completion data, performance reviews).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the design document.
• Provide a template document with sections for system architecture, data requirements, algorithm selection, and implementation considerations.
• Have a technical team member and an L&D stakeholder present to evaluate both technical soundness and learning effectiveness.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a high-level architecture for an AI recommendation system that would match employees with appropriate training resources.
• Specify what data would be required, how it would be collected and processed, and what recommendation algorithms would be most appropriate.
• Explain how your system would balance individual employee needs with organizational priorities.
• Outline how you would measure the effectiveness of your recommendation system.
• Create a simple diagram showing the system components and data flow.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide specific feedback on one strength of the design (e.g., "Your approach to incorporating manager input alongside AI recommendations shows good understanding of organizational dynamics").
• The interviewer should also provide one area for improvement (e.g., "Your design could better address how to handle new employees with limited historical data").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach to address the improvement feedback, focusing specifically on that aspect of the design.

Activity #2: Training Data Analysis and Recommendation Generation

This hands-on exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to work with real training data and generate meaningful recommendations. It tests their technical skills in data preprocessing, feature engineering, and applying recommendation algorithms in a practical context. This activity reveals whether candidates can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical implementation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare an anonymized dataset containing:
• Employee profiles with attributes like department, role, tenure, and skills
• Training course catalog with metadata (topics, difficulty level, format, duration)
• Historical training completion records with ratings/feedback
• Ensure the dataset has some intentional challenges (missing data, outliers, etc.)
• Provide access to a Jupyter notebook or similar environment with necessary libraries.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for completion.
• Have a data scientist or ML engineer available to evaluate the technical approach.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided dataset to understand patterns in training completion and effectiveness.
• Preprocess the data to handle any quality issues and prepare it for modeling.
• Implement a basic recommendation algorithm that suggests relevant training for employees.
• Generate sample recommendations for 3-5 example employee profiles.
• Explain your methodology, including why you chose specific techniques and what limitations exist.
• Suggest how your approach could be improved with additional data or more sophisticated algorithms.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one effective aspect of the candidate's technical approach (e.g., "Your feature engineering to incorporate skill gaps was particularly insightful").
• The interviewer should provide one technical suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might incorporate temporal data to account for changing interests").
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement or explain how they would incorporate the suggested improvement.

Activity #3: Stakeholder Communication Role Play

This role play assesses the candidate's ability to communicate complex AI concepts to non-technical stakeholders. Success in implementing AI for training recommendations depends heavily on gaining buy-in from learning & development teams, department managers, and executives who may have limited technical knowledge but need to understand the system's value and limitations.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where the candidate must explain a newly implemented AI recommendation system to a mixed audience of:
• A Chief Learning Officer concerned about alignment with learning strategy
• Department managers worried about disruption to existing training plans
• IT security stakeholders with questions about data privacy
• Assign team members to play these roles with prepared questions and concerns.
• Provide the candidate with basic information about the fictional recommendation system 30 minutes before the exercise.
• Allow 20 minutes for the presentation and 10 minutes for Q&A.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Prepare a brief presentation explaining how the AI recommendation system works in non-technical terms.
• Address the following points:
• How the system benefits different stakeholders
• What data is used and how privacy is protected
• How the system balances automated recommendations with human oversight
• Limitations of the system and when human judgment should override recommendations
• Be prepared to answer questions and address concerns from various perspectives.
• Use analogies or visualizations to make complex concepts accessible.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should commend one aspect of the candidate's communication approach (e.g., "Your use of a retail recommendation analogy made the concept very accessible").
• The interviewer should suggest one area where communication could be improved (e.g., "The technical details about model training might be overwhelming for this audience").
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to rephrase or restructure their explanation of the identified section.

Activity #4: Recommendation System Troubleshooting

This problem-solving exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to diagnose and address issues in an existing AI recommendation system. It tests critical thinking, debugging skills, and understanding of common pitfalls in recommendation algorithms. This skill is essential as most real-world AI systems require ongoing refinement and troubleshooting.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a case study of a fictional company that implemented an AI training recommendation system that is experiencing specific problems:
• Recommendations becoming increasingly homogeneous
• Certain employee groups receiving irrelevant recommendations
• Low adoption rates despite initial enthusiasm
• Provide system documentation, sample outputs, and user feedback data.
• Include some red herrings as well as actual issues in the materials.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for analysis and solution development.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided materials to understand the current system architecture and issues.
• Identify potential root causes for the problems described.
• Develop a prioritized list of hypotheses to test.
• Outline a troubleshooting plan, including what data you would analyze and what experiments you might run.
• Propose specific solutions for at least two of the identified issues.
• Suggest metrics to track to determine if your solutions are effective.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should acknowledge one strength in the candidate's problem-solving approach (e.g., "Your systematic elimination of potential causes shows strong analytical thinking").
• The interviewer should suggest one area where the troubleshooting approach could be enhanced (e.g., "Consider how user feedback loops could be incorporated into your solution").
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to expand their solution to incorporate the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take between 45-90 minutes. For a comprehensive assessment, you might spread these across multiple interview stages rather than attempting all in one session. The system design and data analysis exercises in particular benefit from allowing candidates adequate time to demonstrate their capabilities.

Should we provide these exercises to candidates in advance?

For the system design exercise and stakeholder communication role play, providing information 24-48 hours in advance allows candidates to prepare thoughtfully, which better simulates real-world conditions. The data analysis and troubleshooting exercises are more valuable when completed during the interview process to assess real-time problem-solving abilities.

What if we don't have team members with the technical expertise to evaluate the AI components?

Consider bringing in a consultant or advisor with AI/ML experience specifically for these interviews. Alternatively, focus more heavily on the communication and conceptual design aspects, which can still reveal a candidate's understanding of AI recommendation systems even if you can't deeply evaluate their technical implementation skills.

How should we adapt these exercises for candidates with different experience levels?

For more junior candidates, provide additional structure and guidance in the exercises. For example, in the data analysis activity, you might specify which algorithms to consider. For senior candidates, introduce more complexity, such as multi-modal data sources or enterprise-scale considerations in the system design exercise.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all four exercises can be adapted for remote interviews. Use collaborative tools like Miro for the system design, provide cloud-based notebooks for the data analysis, use video conferencing for the role play, and share documentation through secure file sharing for the troubleshooting exercise.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from underrepresented groups?

Review all materials for potential bias in language or scenarios. Provide clear evaluation criteria focused on demonstrable skills rather than specific background experiences. Consider offering accommodations such as additional preparation time if requested, and ensure diverse interview panels when possible.

AI-powered personalized training recommendations represent a powerful frontier in employee development, combining the precision of machine learning with the human-centered focus of learning and development. By using these work samples, you can identify candidates who not only understand the technical aspects of recommendation systems but also grasp how to apply them meaningfully in the context of employee growth and organizational learning.

The right talent in this specialized area can transform your organization's approach to skill development, creating more engaged employees and a more adaptable workforce. For more resources to help you build exceptional teams, explore Yardstick's suite of hiring tools, including our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI training recommendation specialists by signing up for a free Yardstick account here