Effective Work Samples for Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation Skills

Synthetic data generation has become a critical skill in today's data-driven landscape, where organizations face increasing challenges with data privacy regulations, limited access to real data, and the need for diverse training datasets. Professionals skilled in creating high-quality synthetic data can help organizations overcome these challenges while maintaining data utility and statistical integrity.

Evaluating a candidate's proficiency in synthetic data generation requires more than just reviewing their resume or asking theoretical questions. Practical work samples provide tangible evidence of a candidate's ability to plan, implement, validate, and communicate about synthetic data solutions. These exercises reveal how candidates approach complex problems, balance competing requirements, and apply their technical knowledge in realistic scenarios.

The work samples outlined below are designed to assess various dimensions of synthetic data expertise, from technical implementation to strategic planning. By observing candidates as they work through these exercises, hiring managers can gain valuable insights into their problem-solving approach, technical proficiency, and ability to communicate complex concepts to stakeholders with varying levels of technical understanding.

Incorporating these work samples into your interview process will help you identify candidates who not only understand synthetic data generation techniques but can also apply them effectively to solve real business problems while addressing privacy concerns and maintaining data utility. This comprehensive evaluation approach leads to more informed hiring decisions and better team outcomes.

Activity #1: Synthetic Data Strategy Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop a strategic approach to synthetic data generation for a specific business case. It assesses their understanding of different synthetic data techniques, their ability to match solutions to business requirements, and their skill in planning a comprehensive implementation approach.

Directions for the Company:

  • Prepare a brief case study (1-2 pages) describing a business scenario requiring synthetic data. Include details about the original data structure, privacy requirements, intended use cases, and any constraints.
  • Example scenario: "Our healthcare company needs to create synthetic patient records for testing a new clinical decision support system without exposing real patient data."
  • Provide relevant details such as data types, volume, sensitive fields, and required statistical properties.
  • Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
  • Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

  • Review the provided business case and develop a strategic plan for generating appropriate synthetic data.
  • Your plan should include:
  1. Recommended synthetic data generation approach(es) with justification
  2. Data preparation and preprocessing steps
  3. Implementation strategy with key milestones
  4. Validation methods to ensure data quality and utility
  5. Privacy and compliance considerations
  • Create a simple diagram or flowchart illustrating your proposed approach.
  • Prepare a brief (5-10 minute) presentation of your plan, focusing on your reasoning and how your approach addresses the business requirements.

Feedback Mechanism:

  • After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the candidate's approach (e.g., "Your consideration of differential privacy techniques was particularly thorough").
  • Provide one area for improvement (e.g., "Your validation strategy could be enhanced by including distributional similarity metrics").
  • Allow the candidate 5-10 minutes to refine their approach based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.

Activity #2: Synthetic Tabular Data Generation

This hands-on exercise assesses a candidate's technical ability to implement synthetic data generation techniques for structured tabular data. It evaluates their coding proficiency, understanding of statistical properties, and ability to preserve relationships between variables.

Directions for the Company:

  • Prepare a sanitized sample dataset (CSV or similar) with 5-10 columns and 100-200 rows that includes:
  • Categorical variables (some with hierarchical relationships)
  • Numerical variables (with different distributions)
  • Date/time variables
  • Some missing values
  • Provide access to a development environment with Python and common data science libraries (pandas, numpy, scikit-learn, etc.)
  • Alternatively, allow candidates to use their own environment with these tools.
  • Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

  • Using the provided dataset, create a synthetic data generation pipeline that:
  1. Analyzes the statistical properties of the original data
  2. Generates a synthetic dataset of similar size that preserves:
    • The distribution of individual variables
    • Correlations between variables
    • Conditional dependencies where present
  3. Includes appropriate handling of categorical variables and missing values
  • Document your approach, including any assumptions made and techniques used.
  • Implement basic validation to demonstrate the quality of your synthetic data.
  • Be prepared to explain your code and the rationale behind your implementation choices.

Feedback Mechanism:

  • Review the candidate's code and output, providing specific feedback on one technical strength (e.g., "Your approach to preserving correlations between variables was particularly effective").
  • Offer one specific technical improvement suggestion (e.g., "Consider how you might better handle the long-tail distribution in column X").
  • Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement and explain how it enhances their solution.

Activity #3: Synthetic Data Validation Assessment

This exercise focuses on the critical skill of validating synthetic data quality. It tests a candidate's ability to design and implement appropriate metrics to ensure synthetic data maintains utility while protecting privacy.

Directions for the Company:

  • Prepare two datasets:
  1. An original dataset (can be public or sanitized internal data)
  2. A synthetic version of this dataset (intentionally include some quality issues)
  • The datasets should be complex enough to require multiple validation approaches.
  • Provide access to necessary tools and libraries for data analysis and visualization.
  • Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

  • You are given an original dataset and a synthetic version that was generated from it.
  • Your task is to:
  1. Design and implement a comprehensive validation framework to assess the quality of the synthetic data
  2. Identify strengths and weaknesses in the synthetic data
  3. Quantify how well the synthetic data preserves:
    • Univariate distributions
    • Relationships between variables
    • Statistical properties relevant to potential use cases
  4. Assess potential privacy risks in the synthetic data
  • Create visualizations that effectively communicate your findings.
  • Prepare a brief summary of your assessment, including recommendations for improving the synthetic data generation process.

Feedback Mechanism:

  • After reviewing the candidate's validation approach, highlight one particularly effective validation technique or insight they identified.
  • Suggest one additional validation method or metric they could have included to strengthen their assessment.
  • Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to implement or explain how they would incorporate this additional validation method.

Activity #4: Privacy-Utility Trade-off Analysis

This exercise evaluates a candidate's understanding of the fundamental trade-off between privacy protection and data utility in synthetic data. It assesses their ability to make informed decisions about this balance based on specific use case requirements.

Directions for the Company:

  • Prepare a scenario description that includes:
  1. A sensitive dataset description (e.g., financial transactions, healthcare records)
  2. Multiple potential use cases for synthetic versions of this data
  3. Different stakeholder perspectives (data scientists, privacy officers, business users)
  • Provide a simple framework or template for the candidate to document their analysis.
  • Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

  • Review the scenario and consider how you would approach the privacy-utility trade-off for synthetic data generation.
  • For each described use case:
  1. Identify the key utility requirements (what properties must be preserved)
  2. Assess the privacy risks and requirements
  3. Recommend a specific approach to synthetic data generation that balances these needs
  4. Explain how you would measure and monitor both privacy and utility
  • Create a decision matrix or similar tool that could help stakeholders understand the trade-offs involved.
  • Be prepared to discuss how your recommendations might change under different regulatory requirements or risk tolerances.

Feedback Mechanism:

  • Provide feedback on one particularly insightful aspect of the candidate's analysis (e.g., "Your consideration of membership inference attacks was particularly thorough").
  • Suggest one area where the analysis could be enhanced (e.g., "Consider how you might quantify the privacy-utility trade-off more precisely").
  • Allow the candidate 10-15 minutes to expand their analysis based on this feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-90 minutes, depending on complexity. For a comprehensive assessment, you might use 1-2 exercises in a single interview session, or spread them across different stages of your hiring process. Consider the seniority of the role – more senior positions might warrant more complex versions of these exercises.

Should candidates be allowed to use reference materials or the internet during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, libraries, and online resources more closely mimics real-world working conditions. This approach tests a candidate's ability to efficiently find and apply information rather than memorization. However, be clear about expectations regarding original work versus copied solutions.

How should we adapt these exercises for candidates with different levels of experience?

For junior candidates, provide more structure and guidance, focus on implementation skills, and use simpler datasets. For senior candidates, emphasize strategic thinking, architectural decisions, and handling complex edge cases. You can also adjust time constraints and evaluation criteria based on experience level.

What if our company doesn't have expertise in synthetic data to evaluate the candidates' work?

Consider bringing in an external consultant for the technical evaluation, partnering with academic institutions, or using standardized evaluation metrics that can be objectively measured. Alternatively, focus on the candidate's problem-solving approach, communication skills, and ability to explain their decisions rather than technical implementation details.

How can we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from underrepresented groups?

Design exercises with clear instructions and evaluation criteria. Provide the same resources and preparation materials to all candidates. Consider allowing flexible scheduling and accommodations when needed. Review your exercises regularly for potential biases in content or evaluation methods. Having diverse interviewers can also help ensure fair assessment.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews. Use collaborative coding platforms, video conferencing with screen sharing, and digital whiteboards. Consider providing slightly more time to account for potential technical issues, and have a backup plan if connectivity problems arise.

Synthetic data generation is a rapidly evolving field that requires a unique blend of technical skills, statistical knowledge, and business acumen. By incorporating these practical work samples into your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can successfully navigate the complexities of creating high-quality synthetic data that balances utility, privacy, and compliance requirements.

The exercises in this guide provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating candidates' abilities across the synthetic data lifecycle – from strategic planning to technical implementation, validation, and privacy analysis. Adapt these samples to your specific organizational needs and technical environment to create a robust evaluation process that identifies truly skilled synthetic data professionals.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for synthetic data skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account here

Generate Custom Interview Questions

With our free AI Interview Questions Generator, you can create interview questions specifically tailored to a job description or key trait.
Raise the talent bar.
Learn the strategies and best practices on how to hire and retain the best people.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Raise the talent bar.
Learn the strategies and best practices on how to hire and retain the best people.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.