Effective Work Samples for Evaluating Responsible AI Guideline Development Skills

Responsible AI guideline development has become a critical function for organizations deploying artificial intelligence systems. As AI technologies become more integrated into business operations and decision-making processes, the need for clear, comprehensive guidelines that ensure ethical, fair, and transparent use of these technologies has never been more important. Professionals skilled in developing these guidelines must possess a unique blend of technical understanding, ethical reasoning, policy development expertise, and communication abilities.

Evaluating candidates for roles focused on responsible AI guideline development presents unique challenges. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in navigating the complex landscape of AI ethics, risk assessment, stakeholder management, and policy creation. Work samples provide a more accurate picture of how candidates approach these multifaceted challenges in realistic scenarios.

The exercises outlined below are designed to assess candidates' abilities to identify potential AI risks, develop practical guidelines, communicate effectively with diverse stakeholders, and implement governance frameworks. By observing candidates as they work through these scenarios, hiring managers can gain valuable insights into their problem-solving approaches, ethical reasoning, and practical skills in responsible AI governance.

Implementing these work samples as part of your interview process will help you identify candidates who not only understand AI ethics in theory but can translate that understanding into actionable guidelines that protect your organization and its stakeholders while enabling innovation. The right hire will help your organization navigate the evolving landscape of AI regulation and build trust with customers, employees, and the public.

Activity #1: AI Risk Assessment and Guideline Framework Development

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to identify potential ethical risks in AI systems and develop a structured framework for addressing them. It tests their understanding of AI technologies, ethical principles, and their ability to create practical, implementable guidelines that balance innovation with responsibility.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a detailed description of a fictional AI system your company is planning to deploy (e.g., an automated hiring tool, a customer service chatbot with access to personal data, or a predictive maintenance system for critical infrastructure).
• Include information about the data used, how the system makes decisions, and its intended business purpose.
• Ask the candidate to prepare a risk assessment and initial guideline framework document (2-3 pages) prior to the interview.
• During the interview, have the candidate present their framework for 10-15 minutes, followed by 15-20 minutes of discussion.
• Ensure the interviewer has sufficient technical and ethical knowledge to evaluate the candidate's responses.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI system description and identify potential ethical, legal, and social risks associated with its deployment.
• Develop a structured framework for responsible AI guidelines that addresses the identified risks.
• Your framework should include:
• Key ethical principles that should govern the system
• Specific guidelines for data collection, model development, testing, and deployment
• Governance mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and accountability
• Stakeholder engagement strategies
• Prepare a 10-15 minute presentation explaining your framework and the reasoning behind your recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one strength of the candidate's framework (e.g., "Your approach to data governance was particularly comprehensive").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Your framework could benefit from more specific testing protocols for bias detection").
• Ask the candidate to spend 5-10 minutes revising one section of their framework based on the feedback, explaining their thought process as they make adjustments.

Activity #2: Responsible AI Policy Review and Revision

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to critically evaluate existing AI guidelines, identify gaps or weaknesses, and make practical improvements. It assesses their knowledge of best practices, regulatory requirements, and their attention to detail in policy development.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a sample AI ethics policy document (1-2 pages) with intentional gaps, ambiguities, or problematic elements.
• Include issues such as vague language around data retention, insufficient bias mitigation measures, or inadequate transparency requirements.
• Provide the document to the candidate 24-48 hours before the interview.
• During the interview, allow 30 minutes for discussion of their analysis and recommendations.
• Prepare specific questions about their revision choices to probe their reasoning.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI ethics policy document carefully.
• Identify strengths, weaknesses, gaps, and potential issues with the policy.
• Prepare a revised version that addresses the problems you've identified.
• Be prepared to explain:
• What specific issues you identified in the original document
• Why these issues are problematic from ethical, legal, or practical perspectives
• How your revisions address these concerns
• Any additional sections or considerations you believe should be included

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one particularly insightful revision the candidate made and explain why it demonstrates good judgment.
• Identify one area where their revisions could be further improved or where they missed an important consideration.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5-10 minutes addressing this specific area, explaining their approach to incorporating the feedback.

Activity #3: Stakeholder Communication Role Play

This role play assesses the candidate's ability to communicate complex AI ethics concepts to different stakeholders and address concerns effectively. It evaluates their communication skills, empathy, and ability to translate technical concepts into accessible language.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare role play scenarios involving different stakeholders concerned about an AI system (e.g., a non-technical executive worried about compliance risks, a data scientist resistant to new guidelines, or a customer concerned about privacy).
• Provide the candidate with a brief description of the AI system and the stakeholder profiles 24 hours before the interview.
• Have an interviewer play the role of the stakeholder, raising specific concerns and objections.
• Allow 15-20 minutes for the role play.
• The role play should include challenging questions that test the candidate's knowledge and communication abilities.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI system description and stakeholder profiles provided.
• Prepare to explain responsible AI principles and guidelines in language appropriate for each stakeholder.
• During the role play:
• Listen carefully to the stakeholder's concerns
• Explain relevant responsible AI principles clearly and without unnecessary jargon
• Address specific concerns with practical solutions
• Demonstrate empathy while maintaining ethical standards
• Be prepared to handle resistance or challenging questions

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the candidate's communication that was particularly effective (e.g., "You explained the concept of algorithmic bias in a way that was accessible without oversimplifying").
• Suggest one area where their communication could be improved (e.g., "You could have addressed the business impact concerns more directly").
• Give the candidate a second scenario with a similar stakeholder but a different concern, allowing them to incorporate the feedback in a 5-10 minute follow-up role play.

Activity #4: AI Incident Response Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop response protocols for potential AI ethics incidents or failures. It tests their foresight, risk management skills, and ability to create practical governance processes that minimize harm when things go wrong.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario describing an AI system that has experienced an ethical failure (e.g., a recommendation algorithm showing bias against certain groups, a privacy breach in a healthcare AI, or an autonomous system making a harmful decision).
• Include information about the system's purpose, the nature of the failure, and initial impacts.
• Provide the scenario to the candidate during the interview and give them 30 minutes to develop a response plan.
• Allow for 15-20 minutes of discussion about their plan.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI incident scenario carefully.
• Develop a comprehensive incident response plan that includes:
• Immediate actions to mitigate harm
• Investigation process to determine root causes
• Communication strategy for affected stakeholders
• Remediation steps to fix the underlying issues
• Preventative measures to avoid similar incidents in the future
• Documentation and learning processes
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning for each element of the plan and how it aligns with responsible AI principles.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one particularly strong element of the candidate's response plan (e.g., "Your approach to transparent communication with affected users demonstrates strong ethical judgment").
• Identify one area where their plan could be strengthened (e.g., "Your root cause analysis process could benefit from more specific technical investigation steps").
• Ask the candidate to spend 5-10 minutes enhancing the identified area of their plan, explaining how they're incorporating the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each of these exercises requires approximately 45-60 minutes to complete effectively, including time for feedback and improvement. Consider spreading them across different interview stages or selecting the 1-2 most relevant to your specific needs if time is limited.

Should we provide these exercises to all candidates or only finalists?

The more in-depth exercises (like the framework development) are best suited for later interview stages with serious candidates. The policy review or stakeholder communication exercises can be adapted for earlier stages to screen for basic competencies.

How should we evaluate candidates who have strong technical AI knowledge but less experience with formal ethics or policy development?

Look for candidates who demonstrate strong reasoning abilities, even if they lack formal policy experience. Their technical knowledge is valuable if they show they can think critically about ethical implications and learn the policy aspects. Consider pairing such candidates with team members who have complementary skills.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all of these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews. For the framework development and policy review, candidates can share their screens during presentations. Role plays work well over video conferencing, and collaborative documents can be used for real-time revisions during feedback sessions.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from diverse backgrounds?

Be mindful that candidates may have different cultural perspectives on AI ethics. Evaluate the substance of their reasoning rather than expecting specific terminology or frameworks. Provide clear context and be explicit about what you're looking for to avoid assumptions that might disadvantage candidates unfamiliar with your organization's approach.

Should we share our own company's AI ethics principles before these exercises?

It's generally better to evaluate how candidates approach these issues independently first, then discuss alignment with your specific principles afterward. This gives you insight into their natural thinking process and values, which is valuable information regardless of whether they perfectly match your current approach.

Finding the right talent for responsible AI guideline development is crucial as organizations navigate the complex ethical landscape of artificial intelligence. The work samples outlined above will help you identify candidates who can not only articulate ethical principles but also translate them into practical, implementable guidelines that protect your organization and its stakeholders.

By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' abilities to assess risks, develop policies, communicate effectively with stakeholders, and respond to ethical challenges. This comprehensive evaluation approach will help you build a team capable of establishing responsible AI practices that balance innovation with ethical considerations.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Build a complete interview guide for Responsible AI roles by signing up for a free Yardstick account here