Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Product Usage Analysis Skills

AI-enhanced product usage pattern analysis has become a critical capability for modern businesses seeking to understand user behavior, optimize experiences, and drive product decisions. Companies that excel at leveraging AI to analyze usage patterns gain significant competitive advantages through deeper customer insights, more effective personalization, and data-driven product development.

Finding candidates who truly possess the skills to perform this specialized analysis can be challenging. While resumes and interviews provide some information, practical work samples offer a much more reliable method for evaluating a candidate's abilities. These exercises reveal how candidates approach real-world problems, apply technical knowledge, communicate findings, and adapt to feedback.

The work samples outlined below are designed to assess candidates across multiple dimensions of AI-enhanced product usage analysis. They evaluate technical proficiency with data and AI tools, analytical thinking, business acumen, and communication skills. By observing candidates complete these exercises, hiring teams can gain valuable insights into how candidates would perform in the actual role.

Implementing these structured work samples creates a more objective evaluation process, allowing companies to compare candidates fairly while giving applicants the opportunity to demonstrate their capabilities beyond what's listed on their resume. This approach leads to better hiring decisions and helps identify candidates who can truly drive value through AI-enhanced product usage analysis.

Activity #1: Product Usage Anomaly Detection

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify unusual patterns in product usage data using AI techniques. It tests their technical skills in data analysis, anomaly detection, and their ability to translate findings into actionable business insights. This skill is fundamental for professionals who need to monitor product health, detect potential issues, and understand unexpected user behaviors.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a sanitized dataset of product usage metrics (e.g., daily active users, feature engagement, session duration) that includes some deliberate anomalies.
• Include metadata about the product and its features to provide context.
• Provide access to a Jupyter notebook environment or similar tool with common data science libraries installed.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided product usage dataset to identify anomalies or unusual patterns.
• Use appropriate statistical methods or machine learning techniques to detect these anomalies.
• Create at least one visualization that effectively highlights the anomalies.
• Prepare a brief explanation of:
• What anomalies you discovered
• The methods you used to detect them
• Potential business implications of these anomalies
• Recommendations for further investigation or action

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, provide feedback on their technical approach and business insights.
• Offer one specific suggestion for improvement, such as an alternative analysis method or a different way to visualize the results.
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement and explain how it enhances their analysis.

Activity #2: AI Feature Planning for Usage Pattern Analysis

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to plan an AI-driven approach to solving a specific product usage analysis challenge. It evaluates strategic thinking, knowledge of AI capabilities and limitations, and the ability to design practical solutions that deliver business value.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario description of a product usage analysis challenge your company is facing or might face (e.g., predicting user churn, identifying feature adoption barriers, or segmenting users based on behavior patterns).
• Provide relevant context about the product, available data, and business objectives.
• Prepare a simple template for the candidate to document their plan.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the product usage analysis challenge scenario.
• Develop a comprehensive plan for addressing this challenge using AI techniques, including:
• The specific AI/ML approaches you would recommend and why
• What data would be required and how it should be prepared
• How you would validate the effectiveness of your solution
• Potential limitations or challenges of your approach
• How the solution would integrate with existing systems
• Expected business outcomes and how they would be measured
• Document your plan using the provided template.
• Prepare to present and discuss your plan for 10-15 minutes.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their plan, provide feedback on the feasibility, completeness, and business alignment of their approach.
• Introduce a new constraint or consideration (e.g., limited data availability, privacy concerns, or integration challenges).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes adjusting their plan to address this new information and explain their revised approach.

Activity #3: Usage Pattern Insight Communication

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to translate complex AI-derived insights into clear, actionable communications for stakeholders. It tests their data storytelling skills, business acumen, and ability to connect technical findings to strategic decisions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a sample AI analysis report containing findings from product usage pattern analysis (e.g., user journey analysis, feature adoption patterns, or engagement trends).
• Include visualizations, statistical results, and technical details that would typically come from an AI analysis.
• Create a scenario with specific stakeholders (e.g., product managers, executives, or marketing team) who need these insights.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for preparation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI analysis report and stakeholder information.
• Prepare a 10-minute presentation that effectively communicates the key insights to the specified audience.
• Your presentation should:
• Highlight the most important findings and their business implications
• Translate technical concepts into terms relevant to the audience
• Include appropriate visualizations that clarify the insights
• Provide specific, actionable recommendations based on the analysis
• Anticipate and address potential questions or concerns
• Be prepared to deliver your presentation and answer questions as if you were in an actual stakeholder meeting.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on the candidate's communication effectiveness and business acumen.
• Suggest one specific area for improvement (e.g., better prioritization of insights, clearer explanation of a technical concept, or more specific recommendations).
• Ask the candidate to revise a portion of their presentation based on this feedback and present it again.

Activity #4: AI Model Evaluation for Usage Pattern Analysis

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to critically evaluate AI models used for product usage pattern analysis. It tests their technical understanding of model performance, bias considerations, and ability to select appropriate approaches for specific business needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare documentation for two different AI models that could be used to analyze a specific product usage pattern (e.g., a clustering model and a classification model for user segmentation).
• Include performance metrics, model architecture details, training data descriptions, and sample outputs.
• Create a scenario with specific business requirements for the analysis.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the documentation for both AI models and the business requirements.
• Evaluate each model based on:
• Technical performance and accuracy
• Appropriateness for the business requirements
• Data requirements and limitations
• Interpretability and explainability
• Potential biases or ethical considerations
• Implementation and maintenance considerations
• Prepare a written evaluation (1-2 pages) that compares the models and recommends which one should be used, with clear justification.
• Be prepared to discuss your evaluation and answer technical questions about your reasoning.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's written evaluation, provide feedback on their technical assessment and reasoning.
• Introduce a new business requirement or constraint that might affect the model selection.
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes considering how this new information impacts their recommendation and to briefly explain any changes to their evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-90 minutes, plus time for feedback and discussion. We recommend selecting 1-2 exercises that best align with your specific needs rather than attempting all four in a single interview process. The exercises can be conducted during an onsite interview or as a take-home assignment with a follow-up discussion.

Should candidates have access to the internet or reference materials during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, reference materials, and even internet searches creates a more realistic working environment. In real-world scenarios, professionals regularly consult resources when solving problems. This approach evaluates how candidates find and apply information rather than testing memorization.

How should we modify these exercises for candidates with different experience levels?

For junior candidates, consider providing more structure and guidance in the exercises, such as suggesting specific analysis methods or tools. For senior candidates, you might introduce additional complexity, such as conflicting requirements or resource constraints, to test their ability to navigate ambiguity and make strategic trade-offs.

What if we don't have real product data that we can share with candidates?

You can create synthetic data that mimics the patterns and characteristics of your actual product usage data. Alternatively, you can use publicly available datasets that represent similar types of user behavior data. The key is ensuring the data presents realistic analytical challenges relevant to your business context.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different technical approaches than we expected?

Focus on the effectiveness and appropriateness of their approach rather than whether it matches your expected solution. Different approaches can provide valuable perspectives and may even improve your current methods. Evaluate whether their solution addresses the core business need, is technically sound, and demonstrates good problem-solving skills.

Can these exercises be adapted for remote interviews?

Yes, all of these exercises can be conducted remotely. For technical exercises, use collaborative coding platforms or provide access to cloud-based notebooks. For presentations, use video conferencing tools that allow screen sharing. Consider breaking longer exercises into multiple sessions to avoid screen fatigue during remote interviews.

AI-enhanced product usage pattern analysis is a rapidly evolving field that requires a unique combination of technical expertise, analytical thinking, and business acumen. By implementing these work samples in your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can truly drive value through sophisticated usage pattern analysis. For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's tools for creating AI job descriptions, generating effective interview questions, and developing comprehensive interview guides.

Want to build a complete interview guide for AI-Enhanced Product Usage Pattern Analysis? Sign up for a free Yardstick account