Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Fraud Detection Specialists

Fraud detection has evolved dramatically with the integration of artificial intelligence, requiring specialists who can blend technical expertise with business acumen. Organizations seeking professionals in AI-powered fraud detection need evaluation methods that go beyond traditional interviews to assess candidates' practical abilities. The complexity of modern fraud schemes demands professionals who can not only understand AI algorithms but also apply them effectively within business operations contexts.

Effective fraud detection specialists must demonstrate proficiency in multiple domains: data analysis, machine learning implementation, pattern recognition, and business process understanding. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in these areas, particularly their ability to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world fraud scenarios. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach complex fraud detection challenges under conditions similar to those they'll face on the job.

The financial implications of hiring the wrong fraud detection specialist can be severe. A single undetected fraud scheme can cost organizations millions, while false positives can disrupt legitimate business operations. By implementing targeted work samples, organizations can significantly reduce hiring risks by observing candidates' actual problem-solving approaches, technical skills, and decision-making processes when confronted with realistic fraud scenarios.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities across the essential skill domains for AI-powered fraud detection roles. Each exercise simulates real-world challenges that fraud detection specialists encounter, providing organizations with meaningful insights into candidates' capabilities. These exercises assess not only technical proficiency but also critical thinking, communication skills, and business judgment—all crucial for success in modern fraud detection environments.

Activity #1: Anomaly Detection Algorithm Assessment

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze, interpret, and improve AI-based anomaly detection systems—a fundamental skill for fraud detection specialists. Candidates must demonstrate both technical understanding of machine learning algorithms and practical judgment about their application in business contexts. This activity reveals how candidates approach algorithmic problems and balance technical considerations with business needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a dataset containing transaction data with some deliberately inserted anomalies (fraudulent patterns). This should include at least 1,000 records with 10-15 features such as transaction amount, time, location, customer history, etc.
• Provide documentation of a simple anomaly detection algorithm currently being used (e.g., isolation forest or autoencoder) with its performance metrics.
• Set up a development environment where candidates can analyze the data and algorithm (either a secure cloud environment or a local setup with appropriate tools).
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions about the data structure or algorithm.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided dataset and the current anomaly detection algorithm documentation.
• Analyze the algorithm's performance, identifying its strengths and weaknesses in detecting the anomalies in the dataset.
• Propose at least two specific improvements to the algorithm or approach that would enhance fraud detection capabilities.
• Explain how you would measure the success of your proposed improvements.
• Prepare a brief (5-minute) explanation of your analysis and recommendations, focusing on both technical aspects and business impact.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis, provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., their technical analysis or business justification) and one area for improvement.
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to refine one part of their proposal based on the feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised approach.

Activity #2: Fraud Detection System Implementation Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to plan and design the implementation of an AI-powered fraud detection system within existing business operations. It evaluates strategic thinking, project planning skills, and understanding of how fraud detection systems integrate with business processes. This activity reveals how candidates balance technical requirements with operational realities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a brief (1-2 page) description of a fictional company, including its industry, size, current fraud challenges, and existing technology infrastructure.
• Include information about current fraud detection methods (if any) and their limitations.
• Provide a list of key stakeholders (e.g., IT, compliance, operations) and their primary concerns.
• Prepare a template for a high-level implementation plan that candidates can complete.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the company profile and current fraud detection challenges.
• Develop a high-level implementation plan for an AI-powered fraud detection system that addresses:
• Technical architecture and components
• Data requirements and sources
• Integration points with existing systems
• Implementation phases and timeline
• Key risks and mitigation strategies
• Success metrics and evaluation approach
• Consider both technical feasibility and business impact in your plan.
• Be prepared to present your plan in a 10-minute presentation, explaining your rationale for key decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the implementation plan and one area that needs more consideration.
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes revising the section that needs improvement.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and strengthen their planning approach.

Activity #3: Fraud Pattern Investigation Case Study

This exercise evaluates a candidate's analytical abilities and investigative skills when confronted with potential fraud patterns. It tests their capacity to identify suspicious activities, follow investigative threads, and make evidence-based decisions. This activity reveals how candidates approach complex analytical problems and balance false positive concerns with fraud detection effectiveness.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a case study with transaction data, user behavior logs, and other relevant information containing several suspicious patterns (some that are actual fraud and some that are legitimate but unusual).
• Include background information on normal business operations and typical patterns.
• Create a template for documenting findings and recommendations.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Ensure the case includes enough complexity to require critical thinking but remains solvable within the time frame.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided case materials and identify patterns that may indicate fraudulent activity.
• Analyze the data to determine which patterns represent actual fraud risks versus false positives.
• Document your investigative process, including:
• What patterns you identified
• How you validated or invalidated each pattern
• What additional data you would request if this were a real investigation
• Your final assessment of which activities represent fraud
• Prepare recommendations for addressing the identified fraud risks and improving detection capabilities.
• Be ready to present your findings in a 10-minute briefing.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one aspect of their investigative approach that was effective and one area where their analysis could be strengthened.
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revisit one part of their analysis based on the feedback.
• Assess how they incorporate the feedback and whether they can refine their analytical approach.

Activity #4: Cross-Functional Fraud Alert Communication

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to communicate complex fraud findings to diverse stakeholders and collaborate on response strategies. It evaluates communication skills, business acumen, and the ability to translate technical insights into actionable business recommendations. This activity reveals how candidates bridge the gap between technical fraud detection and business operations.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where an AI system has detected a new, sophisticated fraud pattern that affects multiple business units.
• Prepare profiles of three stakeholders the candidate will need to brief: a technical team lead, a business operations manager, and a C-level executive.
• Include technical details about the fraud pattern, its potential business impact, and any time-sensitive considerations.
• Allow 45 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for the role-played meetings.
• Assign team members to play each stakeholder role with specific concerns and questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the fraud pattern information and stakeholder profiles.
• Prepare a communication approach for each stakeholder that:
• Explains the fraud pattern at an appropriate technical level
• Outlines the business implications specific to their area
• Proposes next steps or recommendations
• Anticipates questions or concerns they might have
• Conduct three brief (5-minute) meetings with each stakeholder, adapting your communication style appropriately.
• Be prepared to answer questions and address concerns raised by each stakeholder.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After all three meetings, provide feedback on one communication strength demonstrated across the interactions and one area where communication could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to redo one of the stakeholder interactions incorporating the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to adapt their communication approach based on feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each exercise requires 45-90 minutes, so you should plan to use only one or two in a typical interview process. The Anomaly Detection Algorithm Assessment and the Fraud Pattern Investigation are particularly revealing and could be prioritized if time is limited. Consider spreading exercises across different interview stages rather than conducting them all in one day.

Should we use our actual company data for these exercises?

No, it's best to create synthetic data that resembles your actual data patterns but doesn't contain sensitive information. This protects your company's confidential information while still providing a realistic assessment environment. The synthetic data should reflect the complexity and challenges of your actual fraud detection environment.

How technical should the exercises be for business-focused fraud detection roles?

For roles that focus more on business operations than technical implementation, you can modify the Anomaly Detection Algorithm Assessment to emphasize interpretation of results rather than algorithm modification. Similarly, the Implementation Planning exercise can place greater emphasis on business process integration and stakeholder management than technical architecture.

What if a candidate has no experience with our specific industry's fraud patterns?

The exercises are designed to test fundamental fraud detection skills that transfer across industries. However, you can provide a brief industry primer before the exercises to give candidates context. Focus your evaluation on their analytical approach and problem-solving process rather than specific industry knowledge, which can be acquired on the job.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose approaches different from our current methods?

Different approaches should be evaluated on their merit rather than their similarity to your current methods. Look for sound reasoning, evidence-based decision-making, and awareness of implementation challenges. Candidates who propose innovative but well-reasoned approaches may bring valuable new perspectives to your fraud detection efforts.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using video conferencing and collaborative tools. For technical exercises, consider using screen sharing or collaborative coding platforms. For communication exercises, video calls work well for role-playing stakeholder interactions. Ensure candidates have access to necessary tools and clear instructions before the remote session.

AI-powered fraud detection requires a unique blend of technical expertise, analytical thinking, and business acumen. By implementing these work samples, organizations can more effectively identify candidates who possess not just theoretical knowledge but practical skills in applying AI to fraud detection challenges. The investment in thorough candidate evaluation pays dividends through more effective fraud prevention, reduced false positives, and better protection of business operations.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's comprehensive tools for creating AI-optimized job descriptions, generating targeted interview questions, and developing complete interview guides.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Fraud Detection specialists by signing up for a free Yardstick account here