Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Facility Optimization Skills

Facility resource utilization optimization represents a significant opportunity for organizations to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and enhance sustainability. With the integration of artificial intelligence, this field has evolved dramatically, enabling predictive maintenance, dynamic space allocation, energy optimization, and intelligent scheduling of resources. Finding candidates who can effectively implement AI solutions for facility optimization requires evaluating both technical expertise and practical application skills.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized domain. While resumes may highlight relevant experience and certifications, they don't demonstrate how candidates approach real-world facility optimization challenges or implement AI solutions. Work samples provide a window into a candidate's problem-solving process, technical proficiency, and ability to translate complex AI concepts into practical facility management solutions.

The intersection of AI and facility management requires a unique blend of skills: data science expertise, domain knowledge of building systems and operations, and the ability to communicate complex technical concepts to stakeholders with varying levels of technical understanding. Through carefully designed work samples, you can assess candidates' abilities to analyze facility data, develop predictive models, create optimization algorithms, and present actionable insights.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate candidates' proficiency in applying AI to facility resource optimization challenges. These exercises simulate real-world scenarios that professionals in this field encounter, from analyzing energy consumption patterns to optimizing space utilization and resource scheduling. By observing how candidates approach these tasks, you'll gain valuable insights into their technical capabilities, problem-solving strategies, and potential fit for your organization's facility optimization initiatives.

Activity #1: Energy Consumption Prediction Model

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to develop predictive AI models for facility energy optimization. Energy costs represent a significant portion of facility operating expenses, and AI-driven prediction models can identify patterns, anomalies, and optimization opportunities that traditional analysis might miss. This exercise tests the candidate's data analysis skills, machine learning knowledge, and ability to translate technical insights into actionable facility management recommendations.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with 12 months of anonymized energy consumption data from a commercial building, including hourly electricity usage, HVAC operation, occupancy rates, and external temperature data.
• Include basic building specifications (square footage, number of floors, primary usage type).
• Allow candidates to use their preferred programming language and tools (Python, R, etc.).
• Allocate 2-3 hours for this exercise, which can be completed remotely.
• Provide clear evaluation criteria focusing on methodology, model accuracy, and practical recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided facility energy consumption data to identify patterns and correlations.
• Develop a machine learning model to predict future energy consumption based on historical patterns, occupancy, and weather forecasts.
• Identify at least three specific optimization opportunities that could reduce energy consumption without compromising occupant comfort.
• Prepare a brief report (2-3 pages) explaining your methodology, findings, and recommendations.
• Include visualizations that effectively communicate patterns and insights to non-technical stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's submission, provide specific feedback on their analytical approach and model selection.
• Highlight one strength in their methodology or recommendations.
• Suggest one improvement area, such as considering additional variables or alternative modeling approaches.
• Allow the candidate 15-20 minutes to explain how they would incorporate this feedback to enhance their model or recommendations.

Activity #2: Space Utilization Optimization Simulation

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to apply AI algorithms to optimize space allocation in facilities. As organizations adopt hybrid work models and flexible spaces, AI-driven space optimization becomes increasingly valuable. This exercise evaluates the candidate's algorithmic thinking, optimization strategy, and ability to balance multiple competing objectives in facility resource allocation.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a simplified floor plan of an office space (approximately 10,000 sq ft) with various room types (workstations, meeting rooms, collaboration spaces).
• Provide historical usage data showing how different spaces were utilized over a 3-month period.
• Include employee department information, work schedules, and meeting patterns.
• Prepare a scenario involving a 20% reduction in total space while maintaining productivity.
• Allow 2 hours for this exercise, which can be conducted on-site or remotely.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided floor plan and historical usage data to understand current space utilization patterns.
• Develop an AI-based optimization algorithm to redesign the space allocation based on actual usage patterns.
• Your solution should maximize efficiency while ensuring departments that collaborate frequently remain proximate.
• Consider flexible/shared spaces in your optimization strategy.
• Create a visualization comparing current and proposed space allocation.
• Explain the AI methodology you employed and how it accounts for both quantitative metrics and qualitative factors like team collaboration needs.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's optimization approach, highlighting one particularly effective aspect of their solution.
• Suggest one additional constraint or consideration they might have overlooked (e.g., accessibility requirements, future growth projections).
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to explain how they would modify their algorithm to incorporate this additional factor.

Activity #3: Predictive Maintenance System Design

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to design AI systems for predictive maintenance of facility equipment. Predictive maintenance represents one of the highest-ROI applications of AI in facility management, potentially reducing downtime and maintenance costs by 10-40%. This exercise tests the candidate's understanding of IoT sensor data, anomaly detection algorithms, and practical implementation considerations for facility maintenance operations.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide specifications for 3-5 critical facility systems (e.g., HVAC, elevators, electrical systems) including age, maintenance history, and failure incidents.
• Include sample sensor data streams that could be collected from this equipment (temperature, vibration, power consumption, etc.).
• Specify current maintenance protocols and costs.
• Allow 90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare questions about implementation challenges and ROI calculations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a predictive maintenance system using AI to anticipate equipment failures before they occur.
• Specify what sensors would be needed, what data would be collected, and at what frequency.
• Outline the machine learning approach you would use to detect potential failures (anomaly detection, classification, etc.).
• Create a simple diagram showing the system architecture from data collection to maintenance team alerts.
• Estimate the potential ROI of your proposed system, considering both implementation costs and benefits from reduced downtime and maintenance expenses.
• Address how your system would integrate with existing facility management processes.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's technical approach and system architecture.
• Highlight one particularly innovative or thorough aspect of their design.
• Challenge one assumption or approach in their design, such as sensor selection or algorithm choice.
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to defend their original choice or propose an alternative approach based on your feedback.

Activity #4: Resource Scheduling Optimization Challenge

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to develop AI algorithms for optimizing the scheduling of shared facility resources. Efficient scheduling of meeting rooms, equipment, and other shared resources can significantly improve productivity and user satisfaction. This exercise evaluates the candidate's algorithm development skills, constraint handling, and ability to balance multiple competing priorities in a complex scheduling environment.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a dataset representing booking requests for 15-20 shared resources (meeting rooms of different sizes, specialized equipment, etc.) over a two-week period.
• Include information about resource specifications, requestor departments/priorities, and booking durations.
• Intentionally include scheduling conflicts that require resolution.
• Provide clear business rules about scheduling priorities (executive meetings take precedence, etc.).
• Allow 2 hours for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop an AI-based scheduling algorithm that optimizes the allocation of shared resources based on the provided booking requests.
• Your algorithm should maximize resource utilization while respecting business rules and priorities.
• When conflicts occur, your system should suggest alternative times or resources that minimize disruption.
• Implement at least one advanced feature, such as learning from historical patterns to suggest optimal meeting times or locations.
• Create a visualization showing resource utilization before and after optimization.
• Explain your methodology, including how your algorithm handles constraints and conflicting priorities.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's algorithm design and optimization approach.
• Highlight one particularly effective aspect of their solution, such as conflict resolution or constraint handling.
• Introduce a new constraint or requirement (e.g., certain resources requiring downtime between uses for cleaning).
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to explain how they would modify their algorithm to accommodate this new requirement.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each of these exercises is designed to take 1.5-3 hours to complete. We recommend scheduling them as separate sessions from behavioral interviews, either as take-home assignments with a follow-up discussion or as on-site exercises. The total time investment, including feedback and discussion, should be 2-4 hours per exercise.

Should candidates be allowed to use external resources during these exercises?

Yes, allowing candidates to use reference materials, documentation, and even code libraries reflects real-world working conditions. The goal is to assess how they approach and solve problems, not to test memorization. However, be clear about expectations regarding original work versus adapted solutions from external sources.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different technical approaches than we expected?

Focus on the effectiveness of their solution rather than adherence to a specific approach. Different AI methodologies may be equally valid for solving facility optimization problems. Evaluate whether their chosen approach is well-reasoned, technically sound, and addresses the core business requirements. This openness may even introduce your team to innovative approaches.

What if we don't have real facility data to provide for these exercises?

You can create simplified synthetic datasets that mimic the patterns and challenges of real facility data. Alternatively, there are public datasets available for building energy consumption, space utilization, and equipment maintenance that can be adapted for these exercises. The key is ensuring the data presents realistic optimization challenges.

How should we accommodate candidates with different levels of domain expertise in facility management?

Provide sufficient context about facility operations in the exercise materials so that candidates with strong AI skills but less facility management experience can still demonstrate their technical capabilities. During evaluation, distinguish between domain knowledge (which can be acquired) and core AI optimization skills (which are harder to develop).

Should we customize these exercises for different types of facilities (healthcare, education, manufacturing)?

Yes, tailoring these exercises to your specific facility type will provide more relevant insights into how candidates would perform in your environment. Modify the scenarios, constraints, and optimization objectives to reflect the unique challenges of your industry while maintaining the core assessment of AI optimization skills.

The right talent at the intersection of AI and facility management can transform your organization's approach to resource utilization, driving significant cost savings and operational improvements. These work samples provide a structured way to evaluate candidates beyond traditional interviews, revealing their practical problem-solving abilities and technical expertise in applying AI to facility optimization challenges.

By implementing these exercises as part of your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and identify those who can truly deliver value through AI-driven facility optimization. For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's comprehensive tools for creating AI-optimized job descriptions, generating effective interview questions, and developing complete interview guides.

Build a complete interview guide for AI in Facility Resource Utilization Optimization by signing up for a free Yardstick account