Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Ethics Implementation Skills

Implementing AI ethics review processes has become a critical function for organizations deploying artificial intelligence systems. As AI technologies become more powerful and pervasive, the need for structured approaches to identify, assess, and mitigate ethical risks has grown exponentially. Companies seeking professionals who can establish and manage these processes need effective evaluation methods that go beyond theoretical knowledge.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's practical abilities in this specialized area. While candidates may articulate ethical principles or frameworks in conversation, their capacity to operationalize these concepts into workable processes remains untested. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world ethical challenges in AI implementation.

The complexity of AI ethics implementation requires multiple competencies: technical understanding of AI systems, knowledge of ethical frameworks, process design skills, stakeholder communication abilities, and practical problem-solving. Through carefully designed work samples, organizations can observe candidates demonstrating these skills in action rather than merely discussing them.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to implement AI ethics review processes across different contexts and challenges. They assess both strategic thinking and tactical execution, providing a comprehensive view of the candidate's capabilities in this critical domain. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into which candidates can truly operationalize AI ethics in your organization.

Activity #1: Design an AI Ethics Review Framework

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to design a structured process for reviewing AI systems from an ethical perspective. It tests their understanding of ethical principles, knowledge of AI capabilities and limitations, and their skill in creating practical, implementable processes. This exercise reveals how candidates translate abstract ethical concepts into concrete review mechanisms.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a brief description of a fictional AI system your company is developing (e.g., a recommendation algorithm for financial products, a hiring assessment tool, or a customer service chatbot).
• Include basic information about the system's purpose, data sources, and intended users.
• Allow candidates 45-60 minutes to complete this exercise.
• Provide access to a digital whiteboard tool (like Miro or Mural) or document editor for creating their framework.
• Have a technical team member and a business stakeholder present to evaluate the candidate's work.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive ethics review process for the described AI system.
• Your framework should include:
• Key ethical principles to be evaluated
• Specific review stages and checkpoints
• Required documentation at each stage
• Stakeholders who should be involved
• Methods for identifying potential harms
• Approaches for mitigating identified risks
• Ongoing monitoring considerations
• Create a visual representation of your process (flowchart, diagram, or structured document).
• Prepare to explain your framework and answer questions about its implementation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their framework, provide feedback on one aspect they handled particularly well (e.g., "Your inclusion of diverse stakeholders in the review process was excellent").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "The framework could benefit from more specific criteria for evaluating fairness").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach based on this feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.

Activity #2: Ethical Risk Assessment Case Study

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to identify and analyze ethical risks in an existing AI implementation. It evaluates their critical thinking skills, ethical awareness, and practical problem-solving abilities when confronted with a realistic scenario. This activity reveals how candidates approach ethical analysis in concrete situations rather than abstract discussions.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed case study of an AI system with embedded ethical issues (e.g., a facial recognition system showing accuracy disparities across demographics, a content moderation algorithm with concerning false positives, or a predictive policing tool with potential bias).
• Include system specifications, performance metrics, and user feedback that hint at the ethical concerns.
• Provide relevant data visualizations or reports that contain clues about the ethical issues.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have technical and ethics stakeholders available to evaluate the candidate's analysis.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided case study materials carefully.
• Identify at least three potential ethical concerns with the AI system described.
• For each concern:
• Describe the specific ethical principle at risk
• Explain the potential harm to users or stakeholders
• Provide evidence from the case materials that supports your assessment
• Recommend 2-3 specific actions to address the issue
• Prioritize the ethical concerns based on severity and urgency.
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-7 minutes) of your findings and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis, acknowledge one strength in their approach (e.g., "Your identification of disparate impact in the system's performance was particularly insightful").
• Provide one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how technical constraints might affect the feasibility of your recommendations").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes refining one of their recommendations based on this feedback.

Activity #3: Stakeholder Communication Role Play

This role play evaluates a candidate's ability to communicate complex ethical considerations to different stakeholders. It tests their translation skills between technical and non-technical language, their persuasiveness, and their ability to build consensus around ethical priorities. This exercise reveals how candidates navigate the human aspects of implementing ethics processes.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario involving an AI system with ethical implications that need to be communicated to stakeholders.
• Create brief profiles for two stakeholders with different perspectives:
• A technical leader focused on system performance and deployment timelines
• A business executive concerned about regulatory compliance and reputation
• Assign company representatives to play these stakeholder roles.
• Provide the candidate with background information on the AI system and the ethical concern.
• Allow 15 minutes of preparation time and 20 minutes for the role play.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the information about an AI system that has an identified ethical concern requiring stakeholder buy-in to address.
• Prepare to explain the ethical issue and your recommended approach to two different stakeholders.
• During the role play:
• Clearly articulate the ethical concern in terms relevant to each stakeholder
• Address potential objections or competing priorities
• Propose a path forward that balances ethical requirements with other considerations
• Seek commitment for specific next steps
• Adapt your communication style and emphasis based on each stakeholder's perspective and concerns.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the role play, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., "You effectively translated technical concepts into business impact terms for the executive").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider addressing the technical leader's timeline concerns more directly").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to re-do a portion of the conversation with one stakeholder, incorporating the feedback.

Activity #4: Ethics Implementation Planning Exercise

This planning exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to operationalize ethics guidelines across an organization. It tests their project management skills, understanding of organizational change, and ability to create practical implementation roadmaps. This activity reveals how candidates approach the systematic integration of ethics processes into existing workflows.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a scenario where your organization has adopted a set of AI ethics principles but needs to implement them across multiple teams and projects.
• Include information about:
• The organization's structure (teams, reporting lines)
• Current AI development workflow
• Existing governance processes
• Available resources for implementation
• Offer a template or digital tool for creating the implementation plan.
• Allow 60-75 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Create a 90-day implementation plan for operationalizing the AI ethics principles across the organization.
• Your plan should include:
• Key milestones and timeline
• Required resources (people, tools, training)
• Specific changes to existing workflows and processes
• Roles and responsibilities
• Success metrics and evaluation approach
• Potential implementation challenges and mitigation strategies
• Consider both technical and cultural aspects of implementation.
• Prepare to present your plan and explain your rationale for key decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their implementation plan, highlight one particularly effective element (e.g., "Your phased approach with clear success criteria for each stage is excellent").
• Provide one constructive suggestion (e.g., "Consider how you might address resistance from teams with tight delivery deadlines").
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to revise a specific portion of their plan based on this feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each exercise requires 45-75 minutes for completion, plus time for feedback and revision. Consider spreading them across different interview stages or selecting the 1-2 most relevant to your specific needs. For senior roles, a half-day assessment incorporating multiple exercises may be appropriate.

Should we provide these exercises as take-home assignments or conduct them in person?

The framework design and implementation planning exercises work well as take-home assignments with a follow-up discussion. The case study analysis and stakeholder role play are more effective when conducted live, either in-person or via video conference, as they allow you to observe the candidate's thinking process and communication skills in real-time.

How should we evaluate candidates who have strong technical AI knowledge but limited ethics experience?

Look for transferable skills like systematic thinking, stakeholder management, and process design. Strong candidates may not use standard ethics terminology but should demonstrate an ability to identify potential harms, consider diverse perspectives, and create structured approaches to addressing concerns.

Can these exercises be adapted for different levels of seniority?

Yes. For junior roles, simplify the scenarios and focus on specific components rather than comprehensive frameworks. For senior roles, increase complexity by adding constraints, competing priorities, or cross-functional considerations. Adjust expectations for the depth of analysis and breadth of solutions accordingly.

How can we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from underrepresented backgrounds?

Provide clear instructions and evaluation criteria in advance. Ensure scenarios don't require specialized industry knowledge that might favor certain backgrounds. Consider offering preparation materials about your organization's approach to AI ethics. Standardize your evaluation process and have diverse evaluators when possible.

Should we share our own AI ethics principles with candidates before these exercises?

This depends on what you're evaluating. If you're assessing alignment with your existing approach, sharing your principles makes sense. If you're evaluating a candidate's independent thinking and approach to ethics, it may be better to provide only general information and observe what principles they prioritize naturally.

The implementation of AI ethics review processes represents a critical capability for organizations deploying artificial intelligence systems. By incorporating these practical work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain valuable insights into candidates' abilities to translate ethical principles into actionable processes. These exercises evaluate not just theoretical knowledge, but the practical skills needed to identify risks, design review frameworks, communicate with stakeholders, and implement organization-wide changes.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI job descriptions generator, interview question generator, and comprehensive interview guide creator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI ethics implementation by signing up for a free Yardstick account here