Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI-Driven Employee Engagement Analysis Skills

Employee engagement is a critical factor in organizational success, and the ability to analyze engagement patterns using AI has become increasingly valuable. Companies that can effectively leverage AI to understand and improve employee engagement gain a significant competitive advantage in talent retention, productivity, and overall organizational health.

Evaluating candidates for roles involving AI-driven employee engagement analysis requires assessing both technical AI capabilities and domain expertise in human resources and employee experience. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true abilities in these complex, multidisciplinary areas. Work samples provide a realistic preview of how candidates approach problems, apply their technical skills, and communicate insights in this specialized field.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to design AI solutions for engagement analysis, work with engagement data, interpret patterns, and translate technical findings into actionable recommendations. These exercises simulate real-world scenarios that professionals in this field encounter, allowing hiring managers to assess both technical proficiency and practical application.

By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you can more accurately identify candidates who not only understand AI and data analysis techniques but can also apply them effectively to solve employee engagement challenges. This approach helps ensure you select individuals who can truly drive value through AI-powered engagement insights rather than those who simply have theoretical knowledge.

Activity #1: Engagement Data Pattern Identification

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to identify meaningful patterns in employee engagement data using AI techniques. It evaluates their technical skills in data analysis, their understanding of engagement metrics, and their ability to apply appropriate AI methods to extract actionable insights from complex datasets.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a sanitized dataset containing employee engagement survey results, pulse survey data, or similar engagement metrics. Include at least 500-1000 records with variables such as department, tenure, engagement scores across different dimensions, and demographic information (with all personally identifying information removed).
• Provide access to a data analysis environment (such as Jupyter Notebook, Google Colab, or similar) with necessary libraries pre-installed.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a brief on the data sources, collection methods, and any relevant context about the organization's engagement measurement approach.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided dataset and organizational context.
• Identify 3-5 significant patterns or insights in the employee engagement data using appropriate AI/ML techniques (clustering, regression, classification, etc.).
• Create visualizations that effectively communicate these patterns.
• Prepare a brief explanation of:
• The techniques you chose and why
• The patterns you identified
• The potential business implications of these patterns
• Recommendations for further analysis or action

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, provide feedback on one aspect they did well (e.g., choice of analytical technique, clarity of visualization) and one area for improvement (e.g., depth of analysis, interpretation of results).
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to refine one aspect of their analysis based on the feedback, such as applying a different analytical technique or reinterpreting a specific pattern.
• Observe how they incorporate feedback and whether they can quickly adapt their approach.

Activity #2: AI-Driven Engagement Initiative Design

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to design an AI-powered solution for an employee engagement challenge. It tests their strategic thinking, understanding of AI capabilities and limitations, and ability to align technical solutions with business needs in the employee engagement space.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario brief describing an employee engagement challenge your organization is facing (e.g., declining engagement in remote teams, high turnover in specific departments, or inconsistent manager effectiveness).
• Include relevant context such as current engagement measurement approaches, available data sources, and organizational constraints.
• Provide information about your technology environment and any existing AI/analytics capabilities.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for preparation and 20 minutes for presentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and design an AI-driven approach to address the employee engagement challenge.
• Your proposal should include:
• Clear definition of the problem and desired outcomes
• Data sources you would leverage (existing and new)
• AI/ML techniques you would apply and why
• Implementation approach and timeline
• Expected benefits and how you would measure success
• Potential challenges and how you would address them
• Prepare a concise presentation of your proposal (5-7 slides or equivalent)

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their proposal, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., innovative approach, practical implementation plan) and one area for improvement (e.g., addressing a specific constraint, considering an additional data source).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes refining one aspect of their proposal based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to quickly incorporate feedback and strengthen their solution.

Activity #3: Engagement Anomaly Detection and Response

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to identify unusual patterns in engagement data and develop appropriate responses. It evaluates their technical skills in anomaly detection, critical thinking about engagement factors, and ability to translate technical findings into practical HR interventions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a dataset showing employee engagement metrics over time (12-24 months), with several deliberate anomalies inserted (e.g., sudden drops in specific departments, unusual response patterns, unexpected correlations).
• Include contextual information about organizational events during this period (reorganizations, leadership changes, policy updates, etc.).
• Provide access to appropriate analysis tools.
• Allow 60 minutes for analysis and recommendation development.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided engagement data to identify anomalies or unusual patterns.
• For each anomaly you identify:
• Describe the nature of the anomaly and how you detected it
• Propose possible explanations based on the provided context
• Recommend an approach to investigate further
• Suggest potential interventions if your hypothesis is correct
• Prioritize the anomalies based on their potential impact on overall engagement and organizational performance.
• Prepare a brief report or presentation summarizing your findings and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis, provide feedback on one effective aspect (e.g., detection methodology, insightful explanation) and one area for improvement (e.g., consideration of alternative explanations, depth of recommended interventions).
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes refining their approach to one specific anomaly based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to deepen their analysis and develop more nuanced recommendations.

Activity #4: Executive Communication of AI Engagement Insights

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to translate complex AI-driven engagement analysis into clear, actionable insights for senior leadership. It tests their communication skills, business acumen, and ability to connect technical findings to strategic business outcomes.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a detailed AI analysis report containing engagement patterns across different segments of your organization, including technical details about the analysis methods.
• Create a brief describing a fictional executive team with varying levels of technical understanding and specific business concerns related to employee engagement.
• Provide information about current strategic priorities and business challenges.
• Allow 45 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the technical analysis report and executive context.
• Prepare a concise executive summary (2-3 pages or 5-7 slides) that:
• Highlights the most significant engagement insights from the analysis
• Explains the business implications in non-technical terms
• Connects findings to current strategic priorities
• Recommends specific actions based on the insights
• Anticipates and addresses potential questions or concerns
• Be prepared to deliver your presentation and answer questions as if speaking to the executive team.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., clarity of explanation, effective prioritization) and one area for improvement (e.g., business relevance, actionability of recommendations).
• Ask the candidate to revise one section of their presentation based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to adapt their communication approach while maintaining the integrity of the technical insights.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical AI knowledge should candidates demonstrate in these exercises?

Candidates should demonstrate sufficient technical knowledge to select appropriate AI techniques for engagement analysis and explain their choices. However, the focus should be on their ability to apply these techniques to solve real business problems rather than deep theoretical expertise. Look for candidates who can bridge the gap between technical capabilities and practical HR applications.

Should we provide real company data for these exercises?

While using real data can make exercises more relevant, it's important to thoroughly anonymize and sanitize any actual employee data. Alternatively, you can create synthetic datasets that reflect realistic engagement patterns. The key is ensuring the data contains enough complexity and nuance to allow meaningful analysis.

How should we evaluate candidates with different backgrounds (e.g., more HR vs. more AI)?

Consider creating a balanced scoring rubric that evaluates both technical proficiency and domain expertise. Candidates with stronger HR backgrounds might excel at interpretation and recommendations, while those with stronger AI backgrounds might demonstrate more sophisticated analytical approaches. The ideal candidate shows strength in both areas or demonstrates the ability to quickly develop in their weaker area.

What if we don't have the technical environment to support these exercises?

For organizations without advanced technical environments, consider simplifying the exercises to use common tools like Excel or free versions of data visualization platforms. Alternatively, you can focus more on the design and interpretation aspects, providing pre-analyzed data and asking candidates to interpret and develop recommendations based on the findings.

How can we ensure these exercises don't take too much of the candidate's time?

Be transparent about time expectations upfront and design exercises to be completed within reasonable timeframes. Consider offering these exercises as paid assignments for final-round candidates to respect their time and expertise. You can also break complex exercises into smaller components or focus on specific aspects rather than comprehensive solutions.

Should candidates be allowed to use AI tools like ChatGPT during these exercises?

This depends on your organization's approach to AI tools in the workplace. If your team regularly uses such tools, allowing them in the assessment provides a more realistic evaluation of how candidates would perform on the job. If you do allow them, focus your evaluation on how effectively candidates leverage these tools rather than whether they use them.

The ability to effectively analyze employee engagement patterns using AI represents a powerful competitive advantage in today's talent-focused business environment. By incorporating these practical work samples into your hiring process, you can identify candidates who not only understand the technical aspects of AI and data analysis but can also apply these skills to drive meaningful improvements in employee engagement and organizational performance.

These exercises evaluate the full spectrum of skills needed for success in this specialized field: technical proficiency, strategic thinking, business acumen, and communication ability. By observing candidates as they work through realistic challenges, you gain valuable insights into their problem-solving approach, adaptability, and potential impact on your organization.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered hiring tools, including our AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI-Driven Employee Engagement Analysis by signing up for a free Yardstick account