Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Research and Development Managers

Research and Development Managers are the driving force behind innovation in any organization. They bridge the gap between visionary ideas and marketable products or services, requiring a unique blend of technical expertise, strategic thinking, leadership abilities, and project management skills. Finding the right R&D Manager can significantly impact your organization's competitive advantage and future growth trajectory.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal how candidates will actually perform in the complex, multifaceted role of an R&D Manager. While resumes and behavioral questions provide some insight, they don't demonstrate how candidates approach real challenges they'll face on the job. This is where well-designed work samples become invaluable.

Work samples allow you to observe candidates in action, applying their skills to realistic scenarios that mirror the actual responsibilities of an R&D Manager. They provide objective data points that complement interview impressions, helping you make more informed hiring decisions. For technical leadership roles like R&D Management, seeing how candidates think through problems, communicate complex ideas, and lead teams is far more revealing than simply hearing about past experiences.

The following work sample exercises are specifically designed to evaluate the essential competencies of successful R&D Managers: strategic thinking, project management, technical expertise, cross-functional collaboration, and leadership. By incorporating these exercises into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and fit for your organization's unique R&D challenges.

Activity #1: R&D Strategy Development Exercise

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop a strategic R&D roadmap aligned with business objectives—a fundamental responsibility of any R&D Manager. It assesses strategic thinking, market awareness, resource allocation skills, and the ability to translate business goals into actionable research initiatives. The exercise reveals how candidates prioritize competing demands and balance short-term deliverables with long-term innovation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a brief (1-2 page) document describing a fictional company in your industry, including its current product portfolio, market position, competitive landscape, and high-level business objectives for the next 2-3 years.
• Include some basic financial constraints (annual R&D budget) and team composition (number and types of researchers/engineers available).
• Provide this document to candidates 24-48 hours before the interview to allow adequate preparation time.
• Allocate 30 minutes for the candidate's presentation and 15 minutes for questions and feedback.
• Prepare a panel of 2-3 evaluators who can assess both the strategic and technical aspects of the proposal.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided company information and develop a 12-month R&D strategy that supports the business objectives.
• Prepare a 15-20 minute presentation that includes:
• Key research priorities and rationale for selection
• Resource allocation across different initiatives
• Timeline with major milestones
• Approach to measuring R&D effectiveness
• Potential risks and mitigation strategies
• Be prepared to discuss how your strategy balances innovation with practical business needs.
• Include specific examples of how you would collaborate with other departments (marketing, sales, manufacturing) to ensure successful commercialization.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one strategic element the candidate handled well and one area where their approach could be strengthened.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5-10 minutes revising their resource allocation or timeline based on the feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to constructive criticism and how effectively they incorporate feedback into their revised approach.

Activity #2: R&D Project Crisis Simulation

This simulation tests a candidate's ability to manage complex R&D projects under pressure—particularly when things go wrong. It evaluates problem-solving skills, decision-making under constraints, risk assessment capabilities, and communication during crisis situations. The exercise reveals how candidates prioritize competing demands and make difficult trade-off decisions that R&D Managers frequently face.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario about an R&D project that has encountered significant problems (e.g., technical failure, budget overrun, timeline slippage, or unexpected competitive product launch).
• Prepare a brief document with project background, team composition, current status, and the specific crisis situation.
• Include relevant data points like budget information, timeline constraints, and technical specifications.
• Provide this information to candidates 30 minutes before the exercise to allow them to review and prepare.
• Assign 1-2 team members to role-play as project stakeholders (team members, executives, or cross-functional partners).

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the project information and crisis scenario.
• Prepare an action plan to address the immediate crisis and get the project back on track.
• Participate in a 30-minute simulation where you will:
• Lead a crisis response meeting with the stakeholders
• Communicate your assessment of the situation
• Present your recommended course of action
• Address questions and concerns from stakeholders
• Delegate responsibilities and establish next steps
• Be prepared to make decisions with incomplete information and explain your rationale.
• Demonstrate how you would balance technical considerations with business imperatives.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the simulation, provide feedback on one aspect of crisis management the candidate handled effectively and one area where their approach could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes revising their communication approach or decision based on the feedback.
• Observe how they adapt their strategy and whether they maintain composure while incorporating feedback under pressure.

Activity #3: Technical Evaluation and Mentoring Exercise

This exercise assesses a candidate's technical expertise and ability to evaluate and develop team members—two critical skills for effective R&D leadership. It reveals the candidate's depth of technical knowledge, ability to identify strengths and weaknesses in others' work, and skill in providing constructive guidance that improves performance while maintaining motivation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a technical document relevant to your industry (e.g., a research proposal, technical specification, experiment design, or product development plan).
• Intentionally include some technical strengths and weaknesses, areas of ambiguity, and opportunities for improvement.
• Select a junior team member or someone playing that role who will receive feedback from the candidate.
• Provide the technical document to candidates 1 hour before the exercise.
• Allocate 45 minutes for the entire exercise: 20 minutes for document review, 15 minutes for feedback delivery, and 10 minutes for discussion.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided technical document and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses.
• Prepare constructive feedback that would help improve the work.
• In a one-on-one meeting with the document's "author," provide feedback that:
• Acknowledges the strengths of the work
• Identifies areas for improvement
• Offers specific, actionable guidance for enhancing the technical approach
• Maintains a supportive, developmental tone
• Be prepared to answer technical questions from the "author" and provide additional guidance as needed.
• Demonstrate how you would use this interaction as a development opportunity for a team member.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the feedback session, provide the candidate with one observation about what they did well in the mentoring interaction and one suggestion for improvement.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes demonstrating how they would adjust their approach based on this feedback.
• Observe how effectively they incorporate the feedback while maintaining their authentic leadership style.

Activity #4: Cross-Functional Collaboration Simulation

This simulation evaluates a candidate's ability to collaborate with other departments to drive successful commercialization of R&D innovations—a key responsibility highlighted in the job description. It assesses communication skills, stakeholder management, ability to translate technical concepts for non-technical audiences, and effectiveness in navigating competing priorities across departments.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario involving a new technology or product that is ready to transition from R&D to commercialization.
• Prepare role descriptions for 2-3 stakeholders from different departments (e.g., marketing, manufacturing, finance) with specific concerns and priorities.
• Include some inherent tensions between departments (e.g., manufacturing concerned about production complexity, marketing wanting additional features, finance focused on cost constraints).
• Brief team members who will play these roles on their positions and concerns.
• Provide the candidate with background information on the technology and commercialization timeline 1 hour before the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the information about the technology and commercialization plans.
• Prepare for a cross-functional meeting where you will:
• Present the technology's capabilities and readiness for commercialization
• Address concerns from different departments
• Facilitate discussion to resolve conflicts
• Build consensus on a path forward
• Establish clear next steps and responsibilities
• During the 30-minute simulation, demonstrate your ability to:
• Translate technical concepts for non-technical stakeholders
• Listen actively to different perspectives
• Find creative solutions that address multiple needs
• Build buy-in for the commercialization plan
• Maintain focus on overall business objectives

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the simulation, provide feedback on one aspect of stakeholder management the candidate handled well and one area where their approach could be more effective.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes demonstrating how they would address a specific stakeholder concern differently based on the feedback.
• Observe how they adapt their communication style and problem-solving approach to different stakeholder needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise requires approximately 60-90 minutes total, including preparation time, the activity itself, and feedback. For the strategy development exercise, candidates will need additional preparation time (24-48 hours) before the interview. We recommend spreading these exercises across different interview stages rather than attempting to complete multiple exercises in a single day.

Should we use all four exercises for every candidate?

Not necessarily. Select the exercises most relevant to your specific R&D needs and organizational challenges. For most hiring processes, two well-executed work samples will provide significant insight. The strategy development exercise and either the crisis simulation or cross-functional collaboration exercise form a strong combination for evaluating key competencies.

How should we evaluate candidates' performance on these exercises?

Create a structured evaluation rubric for each exercise that aligns with the competencies in your job description. Rate candidates on specific observable behaviors rather than general impressions. Have multiple evaluators independently score the exercises before discussing their observations to minimize bias.

What if our company doesn't want to share proprietary information in these exercises?

All exercises can be conducted using fictional scenarios that mirror your industry challenges without revealing sensitive information. Create realistic but fictional products, technologies, market conditions, and company details that allow candidates to demonstrate relevant skills without exposing proprietary information.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Provide clear instructions and adequate preparation time for all candidates. Ensure scenarios don't require specific cultural knowledge unrelated to job performance. Focus evaluation on problem-solving approaches and core competencies rather than familiarity with particular tools or terminology that can be easily learned on the job.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all four exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using video conferencing platforms. For collaborative exercises, use virtual whiteboarding tools or shared documents to facilitate interaction. Provide slightly more preparation time for remote candidates to account for potential technology challenges.

Implementing these work sample exercises will significantly enhance your ability to identify R&D Managers who can drive innovation while delivering tangible results. By observing candidates tackle realistic challenges, you'll gain deeper insights into their capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide.

For more comprehensive hiring resources, including customizable job descriptions, interview questions, and complete interview guides for Research and Development Manager roles, visit Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find the complete Research and Development Manager job description template at https://www.yardstick.team/job-description/research-and-development-manager.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for your Research and Development Manager role? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!