Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Regulatory Reporting Analysts

The Regulatory Reporting Analyst role is critical for organizations operating in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. These professionals serve as the guardians of compliance, ensuring that all regulatory reports are accurate, complete, and submitted on time. A single reporting error or missed deadline can result in significant financial penalties, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational damage for an organization.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in regulatory reporting. While candidates may speak confidently about their experience with regulatory requirements or data analysis skills, these claims can be difficult to verify through conversation alone. This is where well-designed work samples become invaluable in the hiring process.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates actually perform the core functions of the role. They reveal not just technical proficiency, but also critical thinking abilities, attention to detail, and how candidates approach complex regulatory challenges. For Regulatory Reporting Analysts, whose work directly impacts organizational risk and compliance, these insights are particularly crucial.

The following work sample exercises are designed to evaluate candidates across the essential competencies required for regulatory reporting success: data analysis, regulatory knowledge, process documentation, and cross-departmental collaboration. By incorporating these exercises into your interview process, you'll be able to identify candidates who not only understand regulatory reporting in theory but can execute it with precision in practice.

Activity #1: Data Anomaly Detection and Resolution

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to analyze complex datasets, identify reporting discrepancies, and propose solutions—core skills for any Regulatory Reporting Analyst. The activity simulates a real-world scenario where the analyst must review data before submission to regulatory authorities, spot potential issues, and determine appropriate corrective actions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a mock dataset (Excel spreadsheet) containing financial or operational data relevant to your industry with 5-7 deliberately inserted errors or anomalies of varying complexity.
• Include a mix of error types: calculation errors, missing data, inconsistent categorization, outliers, and regulatory classification issues.
• Provide context about what regulatory report this data would be used for and any key regulatory requirements or thresholds.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the exercise.
• Have a subject matter expert available to answer clarifying questions, as would be the case in a real work environment.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided dataset that will be used for an upcoming regulatory submission.
• Identify any anomalies, errors, or inconsistencies in the data that could cause compliance issues.
• Document each issue found, explaining why it's problematic from a regulatory perspective.
• Propose specific corrections or next steps for each identified issue.
• Prepare a brief summary of your findings and recommendations that could be shared with stakeholders.
• Be prepared to discuss your methodology and reasoning during the follow-up discussion.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., thoroughness of analysis, clarity of documentation).
• Offer one specific area for improvement (e.g., missed a particular type of error, could have prioritized issues better).
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to revise their approach or findings based on this feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised work.

Activity #2: Regulatory Change Implementation Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's understanding of regulatory requirements and their ability to plan and document process changes in response to new regulations. It evaluates strategic thinking, project planning, and the ability to translate regulatory language into practical operational steps.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a one-page summary of a recent or hypothetical regulatory change relevant to your industry.
• Include the effective date, key requirements, and any penalties for non-compliance.
• Provide a simplified overview of your current reporting process that would be affected by this change.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the exercise.
• Make available any reference materials that would typically be accessible (e.g., current process documentation).

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the regulatory change summary and current process documentation.
• Develop an implementation plan that outlines:
• Key changes needed to comply with the new regulation
• Data requirements and potential sources
• Timeline with critical milestones to ensure compliance by the effective date
• Stakeholders who need to be involved and their roles
• Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
• Create a one-page executive summary explaining the impact of the regulatory change and your proposed implementation approach.
• Be prepared to present and discuss your plan with the interview team.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the comprehensiveness of their plan and their understanding of regulatory requirements.
• Suggest one area where their implementation approach could be improved or a consideration they may have overlooked.
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to revise or enhance their plan based on this feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to quickly incorporate new perspectives and refine their approach.

Activity #3: Process Documentation Exercise

This exercise evaluates the candidate's ability to document complex processes clearly and comprehensively—a critical skill for ensuring consistent regulatory reporting and knowledge transfer within the organization. It also tests their attention to detail and communication skills.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simple but multi-step data extraction or calculation process that would be part of a regulatory reporting workflow.
• Create a brief verbal explanation of this process that includes some ambiguities or missing steps.
• Provide access to any tools or systems the candidate would need to document the process (e.g., Word, flowchart software).
• Allow 30-45 minutes for the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Listen carefully to the verbal explanation of the regulatory reporting process.
• Ask clarifying questions as needed to fully understand the process.
• Create clear, step-by-step documentation that another analyst could follow to complete the process correctly.
• Include:
• Purpose of the process and its role in regulatory compliance
• Required inputs and expected outputs
• Detailed procedural steps
• Quality control checkpoints
• Common issues and troubleshooting guidance
• Format your documentation in a way that maximizes clarity and usability.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the documentation and provide feedback on its clarity, completeness, and usability.
• Highlight one strength of their documentation approach and one area that could be enhanced.
• Allow the candidate 10-15 minutes to revise their documentation based on your feedback.
• Assess how effectively they incorporate the feedback to improve the final product.

Activity #4: Cross-Departmental Data Collection Simulation

This role-play exercise tests the candidate's ability to collaborate with other departments to gather necessary data for regulatory reports—a key responsibility that requires strong communication, stakeholder management, and problem-solving skills.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where the candidate needs to collect specific data from another department (e.g., Treasury, Operations, Risk) for an upcoming regulatory report.
• Brief an interviewer to play the role of the department contact who is initially reluctant to provide the data due to time constraints, lack of understanding of the requirements, or concerns about data accuracy.
• Provide the candidate with information about the data needed, its regulatory purpose, and the deadline.
• Allow 20-30 minutes for the role-play and discussion.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the information about the required data and regulatory report.
• Prepare for a conversation with the department contact to request the necessary data.
• During the role-play:
• Clearly explain what data you need and why it's important
• Address any concerns or resistance from the department contact
• Negotiate a solution that meets regulatory requirements while being sensitive to the other department's constraints
• Establish clear next steps and timelines
• After the role-play, document the agreed approach and follow-up actions as you would in a real work situation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's communication approach, problem-solving skills, and ability to build rapport while achieving the objective.
• Suggest one specific technique or approach that could have made the interaction more effective.
• Give the candidate an opportunity to reflect on how they would modify their approach based on this feedback.
• If time permits, allow them to redo a portion of the conversation implementing the suggested improvement.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 30-60 minutes, plus time for feedback and discussion. We recommend selecting 1-2 exercises that best align with your critical needs rather than attempting all four in a single interview. The Data Anomaly Detection exercise is particularly valuable as a core assessment for all candidates.

Should we provide these exercises before the interview or conduct them live?

For the Data Anomaly Detection and Regulatory Change Implementation exercises, you can send materials 24 hours in advance to allow candidates time to prepare thoughtful responses. The Process Documentation and Cross-Departmental exercises work best conducted live as they test real-time problem-solving and communication skills.

How should we evaluate candidates who have experience in different regulatory environments?

Focus on assessing their analytical approach and problem-solving methodology rather than specific regulatory knowledge. A strong candidate will ask clarifying questions about unfamiliar regulations and demonstrate transferable skills in data analysis, process implementation, and documentation.

What if a candidate finds issues in our sample data that we didn't intentionally include?

This can actually be a positive sign! It demonstrates exceptional attention to detail and analytical skills. Acknowledge their findings and ask them to explain why they believe these are issues, which provides additional insight into their regulatory knowledge and reasoning.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Provide clear context and background information with each exercise, and make subject matter experts available for questions. Evaluate candidates on their approach and reasoning rather than specific industry terminology or prior knowledge of your company's exact regulatory environment.

Should we compensate candidates for completing these exercises?

For exercises requiring significant preparation time (particularly if assigned before the interview), consider offering compensation, especially for senior roles. This demonstrates respect for candidates' time and expertise while ensuring you attract high-quality candidates who might otherwise opt out of lengthy assessment processes.

The hiring process for a Regulatory Reporting Analyst requires careful assessment of both technical skills and behavioral competencies. By incorporating these targeted work samples into your interview process, you'll gain valuable insights into how candidates approach the core responsibilities of the role in realistic scenarios. This approach not only helps you identify truly qualified candidates but also gives applicants a clearer understanding of the role's expectations.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find more information about the Regulatory Reporting Analyst role in our comprehensive job description.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for this role? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!