Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Backend Developers

Backend developers are the architects behind the digital experiences that power modern businesses. While their work often remains invisible to end-users, their impact on system performance, scalability, and reliability is immeasurable. Hiring the right backend talent is critical for companies looking to build robust technical foundations that can support growth and innovation.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities. Resumes and technical discussions can only tell you what a candidate knows—not how they apply that knowledge in real-world scenarios. This is where carefully designed work samples become invaluable. By observing candidates tackle authentic backend challenges, you gain insight into their problem-solving approach, code quality, architectural thinking, and ability to communicate technical concepts.

The best backend developers combine technical expertise with critical thinking and collaboration skills. They don't just write code; they design systems that anticipate future needs, optimize for performance, and integrate seamlessly with other components. Work samples allow you to evaluate these multifaceted skills in context, revealing how candidates balance theoretical knowledge with practical implementation.

Moreover, work samples provide candidates with a realistic preview of the role, helping them determine if the position aligns with their skills and interests. This mutual assessment reduces the likelihood of mismatched expectations and improves long-term retention. For technical roles like backend development, where skills can vary widely despite similar job titles, these exercises create a standardized evaluation framework that enables fair comparison across candidates.

The following four work sample exercises are designed to evaluate the essential competencies of backend developers: technical proficiency, system design thinking, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills. Each exercise simulates real-world challenges that backend developers face daily, providing a window into how candidates would perform in your actual work environment.

Activity #1: RESTful API Implementation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design and implement a clean, efficient API—a fundamental skill for backend developers. Beyond just coding ability, it reveals how candidates structure their code, handle edge cases, and document their work for other developers.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a specification for a simple RESTful API with 3-4 endpoints that manage a resource (e.g., a product inventory, user management system, or content management API).
• Provide a starter repository with basic project structure, including any preferred frameworks (e.g., Express.js for Node, Flask/Django for Python, Spring Boot for Java).
• Include automated tests that the candidate's implementation should pass.
• Allow candidates to complete this exercise remotely with a 3-hour time limit.
• Provide clear requirements about expected functionality, error handling, and any authentication needs.
• Include a README template that prompts candidates to document their implementation decisions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement the API according to the provided specifications, focusing on clean code organization and proper error handling.
• Write unit tests for your implementation (beyond those provided).
• Document your implementation decisions, including any assumptions made or alternative approaches considered.
• Include instructions for running your solution locally.
• Be prepared to explain your implementation choices during the follow-up discussion.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After submission, schedule a 30-minute code review session where an interviewer walks through the solution with the candidate.
• Provide specific feedback on one aspect the candidate handled well (e.g., "Your error handling was particularly robust") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The authentication implementation could be more secure").
• Ask the candidate to implement a small improvement based on the feedback during the review session, observing how they incorporate feedback in real-time.

Activity #2: Database Schema Design and Optimization

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design efficient database structures and optimize queries—critical skills for building performant backend systems. It reveals their understanding of data relationships, indexing strategies, and query optimization techniques.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a business scenario requiring a moderately complex database design (e.g., an e-commerce platform, content management system, or booking application).
• Provide a list of functional requirements that the database must support.
• Include a dataset with sample queries that would be run against the database.
• Prepare a development environment with the relevant database system (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB) for the candidate to use.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a database schema that efficiently supports the provided requirements.
• Create the necessary tables, relationships, and indexes.
• Write optimized queries for the specified use cases.
• Document your design decisions, including any trade-offs considered.
• Explain how your design would scale as data volume increases.
• Be prepared to discuss how you would monitor and improve database performance over time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the candidate's schema design, focusing on normalization, relationship modeling, and indexing strategy.
• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of their design (e.g., "Your indexing strategy for the product search functionality was well-considered").
• Offer constructive feedback on one area for improvement (e.g., "The many-to-many relationship between users and roles could be more efficiently structured").
• Ask the candidate to revise the specific aspect mentioned and explain their updated approach.

Activity #3: System Architecture Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design scalable, resilient backend systems—a crucial skill for senior backend developers. It reveals their understanding of microservices, cloud infrastructure, and system reliability engineering principles.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario describing a system that needs to scale (e.g., a growing e-commerce platform, a video streaming service experiencing traffic spikes, or a financial application with strict reliability requirements).
• Include current architecture details, pain points, and future growth projections.
• Provide a template for documenting the proposed architecture (e.g., a diagram tool or structured document format).
• Allow 60 minutes for the exercise, followed by a 30-minute presentation and discussion.
• Prepare specific questions about scalability, reliability, and cost considerations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a scalable architecture that addresses the current pain points and accommodates future growth.
• Create a high-level diagram showing system components, data flows, and integration points.
• Document your rationale for key architectural decisions.
• Address specific considerations around:
• Scalability (how the system handles increased load)
• Reliability (how the system prevents and recovers from failures)
• Security (how sensitive data and operations are protected)
• Monitoring (how system health and performance would be tracked)
• Prepare to present and defend your design to the interview team.

Feedback Mechanism:

• During the presentation, ask probing questions about specific architectural choices.
• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of their design (e.g., "Your approach to caching would significantly improve response times").
• Offer constructive feedback on one area that could be improved (e.g., "The proposed database sharding strategy might create operational complexity").
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach to address the feedback and explain their updated thinking.

Activity #4: Debugging and Performance Optimization

This exercise assesses a candidate's troubleshooting abilities and performance optimization skills—essential for maintaining reliable backend systems. It reveals how they approach problem diagnosis, code analysis, and system optimization.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a backend application with intentionally introduced bugs and performance issues.
• The application should be functional but exhibit specific problems:
• A logical bug causing incorrect behavior
• A performance bottleneck (e.g., inefficient database queries, memory leaks)
• A concurrency issue that appears under load
• Provide documentation on the expected behavior and performance requirements.
• Include monitoring tools or profiling capabilities in the environment.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided application to understand its structure and functionality.
• Identify and fix the bugs and performance issues.
• Document each issue found, including:
• The symptoms observed
• The root cause identified
• The solution implemented
• How you verified the fix
• Implement performance optimizations and measure their impact.
• Be prepared to explain your diagnostic process and reasoning behind each fix.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the candidate's fixes and optimizations, focusing on both the solutions and their diagnostic approach.
• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of their work (e.g., "Your systematic approach to identifying the memory leak was impressive").
• Offer constructive feedback on one area for improvement (e.g., "The database query optimization could be more comprehensive").
• Ask the candidate to implement an additional optimization based on your feedback, observing their approach to incorporating new requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allow candidates to complete these work samples?

Each exercise is designed to take 60-90 minutes, with the exception of the API implementation which may require 2-3 hours. Consider your candidates' time constraints and the seniority of the role. For more senior positions, combining the system architecture planning with a shorter version of one of the technical exercises can provide a comprehensive assessment in a reasonable timeframe.

Should we use the same exercises for all levels of backend developers?

Adjust the complexity based on the seniority of the role. For junior developers, focus more on the coding and debugging exercises with simplified requirements. For senior developers, emphasize the system architecture and database optimization activities, with higher expectations for scalability considerations and technical leadership.

How can we make these exercises fair for candidates with different technology backgrounds?

Allow candidates to use their preferred programming language and frameworks when possible. Focus your evaluation on problem-solving approach, code quality, and architectural thinking rather than specific technology knowledge. Provide clear documentation and starter code to minimize the time spent on environment setup.

What if a candidate doesn't complete the exercise in the allotted time?

Incomplete solutions can still provide valuable insights. Evaluate what they prioritized, the quality of what was completed, and their communication about what remains to be done. During the feedback session, ask about their approach and how they would have completed the remaining work.

How should we evaluate candidates who take different approaches to the same problem?

Develop a rubric that focuses on outcomes and principles rather than specific implementations. For example, evaluate database designs on normalization, query efficiency, and scalability rather than expecting a particular schema. This allows for creative solutions while ensuring core requirements are met.

Should we provide these exercises before or after initial interviews?

For most companies, it's best to conduct these exercises after an initial screening but before final interviews. This ensures you invest time reviewing work samples only for candidates who meet basic qualifications, while using the results to inform more in-depth technical discussions in subsequent interviews.

Backend development requires a unique blend of technical expertise, system thinking, and practical problem-solving skills. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide. Remember that the goal isn't just to test technical skills, but to observe how candidates approach problems, communicate their thinking, and respond to feedback—all critical factors for success in a backend development role.

Ready to take your backend developer hiring process to the next level? Yardstick offers AI-powered tools to help you create customized job descriptions, generate targeted interview questions, and build comprehensive interview guides tailored to your specific needs. Check out our backend developer job description template for more insights into defining this critical role for your organization.

Build a complete interview guide for your Backend Developer role by signing up for a free Yardstick account