Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring AI Scientists in Research and Discovery

AI for scientific research and discovery represents one of the most promising frontiers in modern science. Organizations that successfully integrate AI expertise with domain-specific scientific knowledge gain significant competitive advantages in research efficiency, novel discovery capabilities, and innovation potential. However, identifying candidates who possess both the technical AI skills and scientific research acumen presents unique hiring challenges.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field. While credentials and past experience provide some insight, they don't demonstrate how effectively a candidate can apply AI methodologies to solve complex scientific problems, collaborate with domain experts, or navigate the ethical considerations inherent in scientific AI applications.

Work sample exercises offer a powerful solution by simulating the actual tasks an AI scientist would perform. These exercises reveal not just technical proficiency but also critical thinking, problem-solving approaches, and communication skills. They provide concrete evidence of a candidate's ability to bridge the gap between AI technology and scientific discovery.

The following four exercises are designed to evaluate candidates across the essential dimensions of AI for scientific research: data analysis and model selection, research planning, technical implementation, and stakeholder communication. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and identify those truly equipped to drive scientific innovation through AI.

Activity #1: Scientific Dataset Analysis and Model Selection

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to work with real scientific data and determine appropriate AI approaches. It tests their analytical thinking, domain knowledge application, and ability to select suitable models for specific scientific problems. These skills are fundamental for anyone applying AI to scientific research, as they must bridge the gap between raw data and meaningful insights through appropriate AI methodologies.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scientific dataset relevant to your field (e.g., genomic sequences, chemical compounds, astronomical observations, climate data).
• Include a brief description of the research question or problem to be addressed.
• Provide access to the dataset in a standard format (CSV, JSON, etc.) along with any necessary metadata.
• Allow candidates to use their preferred analysis tools and AI frameworks.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focusing on the candidate's approach to data exploration, preprocessing decisions, model selection rationale, and awareness of limitations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided dataset to understand its structure, quality, and characteristics.
• Identify potential AI approaches that would be appropriate for addressing the research question.
• Recommend a specific model or methodology, explaining your rationale.
• Outline how you would preprocess the data for your chosen approach.
• Discuss potential limitations of your approach and how you might address them.
• Prepare a brief (5-10 minute) presentation of your analysis and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one strength of the candidate's approach (e.g., "Your identification of data quality issues was particularly thorough").
• Offer one constructive suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how domain-specific constraints might affect your model selection").
• Allow the candidate 5-10 minutes to respond to the feedback and adjust their recommendation accordingly.

Activity #2: AI Research Project Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to plan complex AI research initiatives in scientific contexts. It evaluates strategic thinking, resource allocation, timeline development, and risk assessment skills. Effective project planning is crucial for AI scientists who must navigate the uncertainties of both cutting-edge AI development and scientific discovery while managing resources efficiently.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a scientific research challenge that could benefit from AI applications (e.g., drug discovery acceleration, climate prediction improvement, materials science innovation).
• Include constraints such as timeline (6-12 months), available resources (computing infrastructure, team composition), and expected outcomes.
• Provide relevant background information about existing approaches and challenges.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focusing on project structure, milestone definition, resource allocation, risk identification, and contingency planning.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a comprehensive research plan for applying AI to the described scientific challenge.
• Define clear research questions and hypotheses.
• Outline specific milestones and deliverables with a realistic timeline.
• Identify required resources (data, computing, expertise) and how they would be utilized.
• Discuss potential risks and challenges, along with mitigation strategies.
• Consider ethical implications and address them in your plan.
• Prepare a 1-2 page written plan or a 10-minute presentation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one particularly strong aspect of the research plan (e.g., "Your approach to incremental validation is well-designed").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might better integrate domain expert feedback throughout the process").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise one section of their plan based on the feedback.

Activity #3: AI Model Implementation for Scientific Data

This hands-on coding exercise evaluates a candidate's technical proficiency in implementing AI solutions for scientific problems. It tests their programming skills, familiarity with AI frameworks, and ability to translate conceptual approaches into working code. Technical implementation skills are essential for AI scientists who must move beyond theoretical models to create practical solutions that generate scientific insights.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a focused coding task related to scientific AI (e.g., implementing a specific neural network architecture for molecular property prediction, creating a clustering algorithm for genomic data).
• Provide a small, clean dataset suitable for the task.
• Include clear requirements for what the implementation should accomplish.
• Set up a development environment or allow candidates to use their preferred tools.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focusing on code quality, algorithm understanding, efficiency, and scientific validity of the approach.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement the requested AI model or algorithm to address the scientific problem.
• Write clean, well-documented code that others could understand and maintain.
• Include appropriate data preprocessing steps.
• Implement basic evaluation metrics to assess model performance.
• Be prepared to explain your implementation choices and any trade-offs you made.
• If time permits, suggest potential improvements or extensions to your implementation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide specific feedback on one strength of the implementation (e.g., "Your approach to handling missing data was particularly elegant").
• Offer one constructive suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might make the feature extraction more generalizable").
• Allow the candidate 15-20 minutes to refactor or improve the identified aspect of their code.

Activity #4: Scientific Stakeholder Communication Role Play

This role play assesses a candidate's ability to communicate complex AI concepts to scientific collaborators with varying technical backgrounds. It evaluates their communication skills, empathy, ability to translate technical concepts, and capacity to build collaborative relationships. Effective communication is critical for AI scientists who must work across disciplines and ensure their work addresses genuine scientific needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where the candidate must explain an AI approach to scientific stakeholders (e.g., explaining a deep learning model to biologists, discussing limitations of an AI prediction system with climate scientists).
• Assign roles to your team members to play different stakeholders with varying levels of AI knowledge.
• Prepare specific questions or concerns that stakeholders might raise.
• Provide the candidate with basic information about the AI approach and the scientific context.
• Allocate 20-30 minutes for the role play.
• Evaluate the candidate's clarity, adaptability to different knowledge levels, use of appropriate analogies, and response to questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided information about the AI approach and scientific context.
• Prepare to explain the AI methodology, its benefits, limitations, and implications to scientific stakeholders.
• Adapt your explanation based on each stakeholder's background and concerns.
• Use appropriate visualizations or analogies to clarify complex concepts.
• Address questions and concerns constructively.
• Focus on building understanding and trust rather than showcasing technical knowledge.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide specific feedback on one communication strength demonstrated during the role play (e.g., "Your use of analogies to explain the neural network architecture was very effective").
• Offer one suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider addressing the ethical concerns more directly when they're raised").
• Allow the candidate to re-attempt a portion of the explanation incorporating the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should we adapt these exercises for candidates with different experience levels?

For junior candidates, consider providing more structure and guidance in the exercises, such as starter code for the implementation task or more detailed prompts for the research planning activity. For senior candidates, increase complexity and ambiguity to test their ability to navigate uncertainty. Adjust evaluation criteria accordingly, focusing more on potential and learning ability for junior roles and strategic thinking and leadership for senior positions.

Should we provide these exercises as take-home assignments or conduct them during interviews?

Both approaches have merit. Take-home assignments allow candidates more time for thoughtful work but require a greater time commitment. In-person or virtual supervised exercises provide better insight into real-time problem-solving but may increase candidate stress. Consider a hybrid approach: a shorter take-home component followed by an in-person discussion or extension of the work.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Use datasets and scientific problems that don't require highly specialized domain knowledge unless absolutely necessary for the role. Provide clear context and background information. Allow candidates to use familiar tools and frameworks rather than requiring specific technologies. Consider offering accommodations for candidates who request them, and evaluate based on problem-solving approach rather than specific solutions.

What if we don't have team members with the technical expertise to evaluate these exercises?

Consider bringing in a consultant or advisor with relevant expertise for the evaluation process. Alternatively, focus on exercises that test communication and research planning, where the evaluation can focus more on clarity, structure, and reasoning rather than technical correctness. You might also consider standardized technical assessments from reputable providers as a supplement.

How much time should we allocate for these exercises in our interview process?

Plan for these exercises to take 3-4 hours total if conducting all four. This could be spread across multiple interview stages. For a more condensed process, select the 1-2 exercises most relevant to your specific needs. Remember that quality assessment requires adequate time—rushing through exercises diminishes their value for both you and the candidate.

Should candidates be compensated for completing these work samples?

For extensive take-home assignments requiring more than 2-3 hours of work, offering compensation is recommended. This demonstrates respect for candidates' time and expertise while potentially increasing completion rates and effort quality. For shorter, in-interview exercises, compensation is less common but providing clear time expectations is essential.

The integration of AI into scientific research represents a transformative opportunity for organizations committed to innovation and discovery. By implementing these carefully designed work samples, you'll be able to identify candidates who not only possess technical AI skills but can also apply them effectively to advance scientific knowledge. The right AI scientist will combine technical prowess with scientific understanding, communication skills, and ethical awareness—qualities that these exercises are specifically designed to reveal.

For organizations looking to build robust AI research capabilities, the investment in a thorough, work-sample based hiring process pays dividends through reduced hiring mistakes, faster onboarding, and ultimately more impactful scientific contributions. These exercises provide a foundation that you can customize to your specific scientific domain and organizational needs.

To further enhance your hiring process for AI scientists or other technical roles, explore Yardstick's comprehensive suite of hiring tools. Our AI-powered job descriptions, interview question generator, and interview guide generator can help you build a complete, effective hiring workflow that identifies truly exceptional talent.

Build a complete interview guide for AI scientists by signing up for a free Yardstick account here