Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring a Research Compliance Officer

Research Compliance Officers serve as the guardians of research integrity within organizations, ensuring that all research activities adhere to applicable laws, regulations, and institutional policies. The importance of this role cannot be overstated – a skilled compliance officer protects not only research participants but also the organization's reputation and legal standing. When hiring for this critical position, traditional interviews alone often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in navigating complex regulatory landscapes.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates will actually perform on the job, revealing their practical knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills in realistic scenarios. For Research Compliance Officers, these exercises can demonstrate a candidate's ability to identify compliance issues, develop effective policies, communicate complex regulations clearly, and respond appropriately to potential violations.

The best candidates will show not only technical knowledge of research regulations but also the critical thinking skills needed to apply that knowledge in ambiguous situations. They'll demonstrate attention to detail while maintaining a big-picture perspective on research integrity. Through carefully designed work samples, you can observe how candidates balance regulatory requirements with practical research needs – a key skill for successful compliance officers.

By incorporating the following exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain valuable insights into each candidate's capabilities that simply cannot be gleaned from resume reviews and standard interviews alone. These exercises simulate the real challenges a Research Compliance Officer will face, allowing you to make more informed hiring decisions and ultimately strengthen your organization's compliance program.

Activity #1: Compliance Policy Review and Revision

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to identify compliance gaps in existing policies and develop effective solutions. Research Compliance Officers must regularly review and update policies to ensure they align with current regulations and address emerging risks. This activity reveals a candidate's knowledge of research regulations, attention to detail, and ability to craft clear, comprehensive policies.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a sample research policy document (2-3 pages) that contains several compliance issues or gaps.
• Include a mix of obvious and subtle problems, such as outdated regulatory references, missing required elements, or procedures that don't align with best practices.
• Allow candidates 45-60 minutes to review the document and prepare their recommendations.
• Prepare a rubric for evaluating responses that considers regulatory knowledge, thoroughness of review, clarity of recommendations, and practicality of solutions.
• Have a compliance team member or research administrator available to answer any clarifying questions about the organization's research context.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided research policy document carefully, identifying any compliance issues, gaps, or areas for improvement.
• Prepare a written summary of your findings, including:

1. Specific compliance issues identified
2. Potential risks these issues pose to the organization
3. Recommended revisions to address each issue
4. Justification for your recommendations, citing relevant regulations or best practices

• Be prepared to discuss your analysis and recommendations with the interview panel.
• Focus on both technical accuracy and practical implementation considerations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, provide one piece of positive feedback about an aspect they handled well (e.g., "Your identification of the outdated consent requirements was thorough and accurate").
• Offer one suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how your proposed changes might impact the workflow of research staff").
• Ask the candidate to take 5-10 minutes to revise one section of their recommendations based on this feedback.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised approach.

Activity #2: Compliance Training Simulation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to communicate complex regulatory information clearly and effectively to different audiences. A key responsibility of Research Compliance Officers is training researchers and staff on compliance requirements. This activity reveals communication skills, regulatory knowledge, and the ability to tailor messages to specific audiences.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a brief description of a new or updated research regulation (e.g., changes to human subjects protection requirements or data security standards).
• Include any relevant background materials they might need to understand the regulation.
• Ask them to prepare a 10-minute training presentation for researchers who need to understand how this regulation affects their work.
• Specify the audience (e.g., clinical researchers, basic scientists, or research administrators) to allow the candidate to tailor their presentation appropriately.
• Have 2-3 staff members role-play as the audience, prepared to ask questions that researchers might typically have.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided regulation and prepare a 10-minute training presentation that:

1. Explains the key requirements of the regulation in clear, accessible language
2. Outlines how these requirements will impact the specified research audience
3. Provides practical guidance on how researchers can ensure compliance
4. Anticipates and addresses potential questions or concerns

• Create any visual aids or handouts you feel would enhance understanding (simple slides or a one-page handout).
• Be prepared to answer questions from the audience in a clear, helpful manner.
• Focus on making complex regulatory information understandable and actionable for researchers.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide positive feedback on one aspect of their communication approach (e.g., "Your use of concrete examples made the abstract requirements much more understandable").
• Offer one suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider addressing potential resistance to these requirements more directly").
• Ask the candidate to revise and deliver a 2-minute segment of their presentation incorporating this feedback.
• Evaluate how effectively they adapt their communication style based on feedback.

Activity #3: Research Protocol Compliance Review

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to identify compliance issues in research protocols and recommend appropriate corrective actions. Research Compliance Officers regularly review protocols to ensure they meet regulatory requirements before research begins. This activity demonstrates attention to detail, regulatory knowledge, and judgment in balancing compliance with research needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a mock research protocol (3-5 pages) that includes several compliance issues of varying severity.
• Include issues related to different regulatory areas, such as informed consent, data privacy, biosafety, or conflict of interest.
• Provide any institutional policies or guidelines that would typically be used to evaluate protocols.
• Allow candidates 45-60 minutes to review the protocol and document their findings.
• Prepare a standardized evaluation form that assesses the thoroughness of review, accuracy in identifying issues, appropriateness of recommendations, and clarity of communication.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided research protocol as if you were evaluating it for compliance with institutional policies and applicable regulations.
• Document your findings in a written report that includes:

1. A summary of compliance issues identified, categorized by severity
2. Specific references to the regulations or policies that apply to each issue
3. Recommended actions to address each issue (e.g., minor revisions, major revisions, or disapproval)
4. Constructive feedback that would help the researchers understand and address the issues

• Be prepared to explain your reasoning for each finding and recommendation.
• Consider both regulatory requirements and the practical needs of researchers in your approach.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's written report, highlight one strength in their approach (e.g., "Your explanation of the informed consent issues was particularly clear and helpful").
• Provide one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider prioritizing the issues more clearly to help researchers focus on the most critical concerns first").
• Ask the candidate to revise one section of their report based on this feedback.
• Assess how well they incorporate the feedback while maintaining regulatory accuracy.

Activity #4: Non-Compliance Investigation Scenario

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to handle potential compliance violations effectively. Research Compliance Officers must investigate reports of non-compliance, determine appropriate responses, and implement corrective actions. This activity reveals problem-solving skills, judgment, and ability to balance compliance requirements with organizational relationships.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario describing a potential research compliance violation (e.g., a report that researchers have deviated from an approved protocol, data security breach, or failure to obtain proper approvals).
• Include relevant background information, such as the research context, individuals involved, and any initial information gathered.
• Provide any institutional policies regarding non-compliance investigations and responses.
• Allow candidates 30-45 minutes to review the scenario and prepare their investigation and response plan.
• Have 1-2 staff members available to role-play as researchers or administrators the candidate might need to interview.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the non-compliance scenario and develop a plan for investigating and addressing the situation.
• Prepare a written investigation plan that includes:

1. Initial assessment of the potential violation and its severity
2. Step-by-step approach for gathering additional information
3. Key questions you would ask relevant parties
4. Potential corrective actions based on different investigation outcomes
5. Recommendations for preventing similar issues in the future

• Participate in a 15-minute role-play where you interview a researcher or administrator involved in the situation.
• Demonstrate professional, objective communication while gathering necessary information.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the role-play, provide positive feedback on one aspect of their investigation approach (e.g., "Your questions were thorough while maintaining a non-accusatory tone").
• Offer one suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might address potential defensiveness more effectively").
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach to one aspect of the investigation based on this feedback.
• Observe how they adapt their approach while maintaining the integrity of the investigation process.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much time should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise requires approximately 60-90 minutes total, including preparation time, the activity itself, feedback, and candidate revision. We recommend conducting no more than two exercises in a single interview day to avoid candidate fatigue. For remote candidates, consider spreading the exercises across multiple days.

Should we provide these exercises to candidates in advance?

For Activities #1 and #3 (policy review and protocol review), providing the materials 24 hours in advance allows candidates to demonstrate their thoroughness and preparation skills. For Activities #2 and #4 (training simulation and non-compliance investigation), it's better to provide only general topics in advance, as these activities test how candidates think on their feet.

How should we evaluate candidates who have experience in different research settings?

Focus on the candidate's approach and reasoning rather than specific regulatory knowledge that might vary across research contexts. The best candidates will demonstrate an ability to identify key compliance principles, ask appropriate questions about unfamiliar areas, and apply their knowledge flexibly to new situations.

What if our organization doesn't have existing policies or protocols to use for these exercises?

You can adapt publicly available sample research policies and protocols from academic institutions or research organizations. Just be sure to modify them to include appropriate compliance issues for testing. Alternatively, professional organizations like PRIM&R (Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research) offer resources that can be adapted for these exercises.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds?

Review all materials to ensure they don't require specialized knowledge that would be specific to only certain types of research organizations. Provide sufficient context and background information so candidates can demonstrate their compliance thinking even if they haven't worked in your specific research setting before.

Should we compensate candidates for completing these exercises?

For exercises requiring significant preparation time, especially if conducted outside the interview day, consider offering modest compensation for candidates' time. This demonstrates respect for their expertise and effort while potentially attracting higher-quality candidates.

The hiring process for a Research Compliance Officer requires careful assessment of both technical knowledge and practical skills. By incorporating these work sample exercises, you'll gain valuable insights into how candidates will actually perform in this critical role. Remember that the best compliance officers combine regulatory expertise with excellent communication, problem-solving abilities, and sound judgment.

Ready to take your hiring process to the next level? Yardstick offers AI-powered tools to help you create comprehensive job descriptions, generate targeted interview questions, and design effective interview guides tailored to your organization's needs. Check out our AI job description generator, interview question generator, and interview guide generator to streamline your hiring process. For more information about the Research Compliance Officer role, visit our detailed job description.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account at https://yardstick.team/sign-up