Effective Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating LLM Application Development Skills

Large Language Model (LLM) application development has rapidly emerged as one of the most sought-after technical skills in today's AI-driven technology landscape. Companies seeking to leverage the power of models like GPT-4, Claude, or Llama 2 need developers who can not only code effectively but also understand the unique challenges and opportunities that LLMs present. Traditional technical interviews often fail to capture the nuanced skills required for successful LLM application development.

The complexity of LLM application development extends beyond standard programming knowledge. Developers must understand prompt engineering, API integration, context management, and how to design applications that effectively leverage these powerful models while mitigating their limitations. They need to balance technical implementation with user experience considerations and ethical implications of AI deployment.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world LLM development challenges. By observing candidates as they plan, implement, troubleshoot, and optimize LLM applications, hiring managers can assess both technical proficiency and problem-solving methodology. This approach reveals how candidates think about the unique challenges of LLM applications, such as handling ambiguity, managing token limitations, and ensuring output quality.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate the multifaceted skills required for LLM application development. Each activity simulates realistic scenarios that LLM developers encounter in their daily work, from architectural planning to hands-on implementation and optimization. By incorporating these exercises into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional coding interviews or resume reviews could provide.

Activity #1: LLM Application Architecture Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design a comprehensive architecture for an LLM-powered application. It tests their understanding of system design principles specific to LLM applications, including API integration, prompt management, error handling, and scalability considerations. This skill is fundamental as it forms the foundation upon which successful LLM applications are built.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a detailed brief for an LLM-powered application (e.g., a customer support chatbot that needs to access company knowledge bases, handle multiple languages, and integrate with existing ticketing systems).
• Include specific requirements such as expected user volume, response time expectations, and any technical constraints.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide whiteboarding tools (digital or physical) for the candidate to sketch their architecture.
• Have a technical team member familiar with LLM applications present to ask clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the application requirements and ask any clarifying questions.
• Design a system architecture that addresses all the requirements, including:
• Components for LLM integration
• Data flow between components
• Storage solutions for context and history
• Error handling and fallback mechanisms
• Scalability considerations
• Sketch the architecture using the provided tools.
• Be prepared to explain your design choices and trade-offs.
• Consider both technical implementation and user experience in your design.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the architecture (e.g., "Your approach to context management is particularly efficient").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might reduce token usage during high-volume periods").
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised design.

Activity #2: Prompt Engineering and Optimization

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to craft effective prompts for LLMs and optimize them for specific use cases. Prompt engineering is a critical skill for LLM application developers, as it directly impacts the quality, reliability, and efficiency of the application. This activity reveals how candidates approach the balance between directive prompts and allowing the model's capabilities to shine.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a specific use case that requires careful prompt engineering (e.g., extracting structured data from unstructured text, generating code based on requirements, or creating a specific tone for customer communications).
• Provide access to an LLM API (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, or an internal model).
• Include examples of desired outputs and edge cases that should be handled.
• Allocate 30-45 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a rubric for evaluating prompt effectiveness based on output quality, handling of edge cases, and token efficiency.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the use case requirements and desired outputs.
• Design a series of prompts that accomplish the task effectively.
• Test your prompts against the provided examples and refine as needed.
• Document your prompt design process, including:
• The reasoning behind specific prompt elements
• How you're handling potential ambiguities or edge cases
• Techniques used to optimize token usage
• Any system messages or context you're providing
• Be prepared to explain how you would evaluate prompt effectiveness in a production environment.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide specific feedback on what worked well in their prompt design (e.g., "Your use of few-shot examples effectively guided the model's output format").
• Offer one specific suggestion for improvement (e.g., "Your prompts could be more token-efficient by removing redundant instructions").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their prompts based on the feedback.
• Test the revised prompts against the same examples and discuss the improvements.

Activity #3: LLM Application Debugging and Optimization

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify and resolve issues in an existing LLM application. Debugging LLM applications requires a unique set of skills beyond traditional software debugging, including understanding model behavior, prompt analysis, and systematic troubleshooting of both code and model interactions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a small, functional LLM application with intentionally introduced issues (e.g., a chatbot with context management problems, inefficient prompt design, or handling edge cases poorly).
• The application should be runnable locally or in a sandboxed environment.
• Include documentation on the intended functionality and observed problems.
• Provide access to relevant APIs and any necessary credentials.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a list of the issues for your reference to evaluate if the candidate identifies them.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the application code and documentation to understand its intended functionality.
• Run the application and identify issues by testing various inputs and scenarios.
• Systematically debug the application, focusing on both code issues and LLM interaction problems.
• Implement fixes for the identified issues, prioritizing based on impact.
• Document each issue found, the root cause, and your solution approach.
• Be prepared to explain your debugging methodology and how you prioritized issues.
• Consider both technical correctness and user experience in your solutions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one aspect of their debugging approach that was particularly effective (e.g., "Your systematic testing of edge cases helped identify the root cause quickly").
• Suggest one area where their approach could be improved (e.g., "Consider how prompt modifications might solve this issue more elegantly than complex code changes").
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement or alternative approach.
• Discuss the trade-offs between their original solution and the revised approach.

Activity #4: LLM Feature Implementation

This hands-on coding exercise assesses a candidate's ability to implement a specific feature for an LLM application. It tests their practical coding skills, API integration knowledge, and understanding of LLM-specific implementation considerations such as context management, error handling, and response processing.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a partially implemented application with clear requirements for a new LLM-powered feature (e.g., implementing a summarization feature, adding memory to a conversational agent, or creating a content moderation layer).
• Provide a development environment with necessary dependencies already installed.
• Include documentation on the existing codebase and API specifications.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Define clear acceptance criteria for the implementation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the existing codebase and feature requirements.
• Plan your implementation approach, considering:
• How to integrate with the LLM API effectively
• Managing context and state if applicable
• Handling potential errors or edge cases
• Optimizing for performance and cost
• Implement the feature according to the requirements.
• Write appropriate tests to verify functionality.
• Document any assumptions or design decisions made during implementation.
• Be prepared to walk through your code and explain key implementation choices.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide specific positive feedback on one aspect of their implementation (e.g., "Your approach to handling API rate limiting was particularly robust").
• Offer one specific area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might make the token usage more efficient in this section").
• Give the candidate 15-20 minutes to refactor the identified area based on feedback.
• Review the changes together and discuss the improvements made.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should we adapt these exercises for candidates with different experience levels?

For junior candidates, consider simplifying the requirements and providing more structure. For example, in the architecture design exercise, you might provide a partial design and ask them to complete it. For senior candidates, add complexity such as multi-model orchestration or advanced retrieval augmentation techniques.

What if we don't have access to commercial LLM APIs for the exercises?

You can use open-source models that can run locally, such as smaller versions of Llama 2 or other open-source LLMs. Alternatively, you can structure the exercises to focus more on the design and implementation approach, with simulated API responses for testing.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different approaches than we expected?

Focus on the effectiveness of their solution rather than adherence to a specific approach. LLM application development is still evolving, and innovative approaches should be valued. Evaluate whether their solution meets the requirements, handles edge cases appropriately, and demonstrates good engineering principles.

Should candidates be allowed to use reference materials or look up documentation during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation and references more accurately reflects real-world development conditions. This approach tests a candidate's ability to find and apply information efficiently rather than memorization. However, you may want to restrict access to complete solution repositories or direct code copying.

How can we ensure these exercises don't take too much of the candidate's time?

Be transparent about time expectations upfront. Consider offering these exercises as take-home assignments with clear time limits, or schedule dedicated interview sessions with appropriate time allocations. Focus the exercises on specific aspects rather than requiring complete implementations.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using collaborative coding platforms, video conferencing with screen sharing, and digital whiteboarding tools. Ensure candidates have access to the necessary environment and tools before the interview.

The effectiveness of your LLM application development hiring process directly impacts your company's ability to build innovative AI-powered solutions. By incorporating these practical work samples into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and approach to solving real-world LLM development challenges. This comprehensive evaluation helps ensure you're building a team that can navigate the unique complexities of LLM application development and deliver exceptional AI experiences.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for LLM Application Development by signing up for a free Yardstick account