Effective Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Product Analytics Dashboard Skills

Product analytics dashboards powered by AI are transforming how businesses understand user behavior, make data-driven decisions, and identify growth opportunities. As organizations increasingly rely on these sophisticated tools, finding candidates who can effectively create, implement, and optimize AI-driven analytics dashboards has become critical to maintaining competitive advantage.

The intersection of artificial intelligence and product analytics requires a unique blend of technical expertise, business acumen, and design thinking. Candidates must demonstrate proficiency not only in data science and AI concepts but also in translating complex data into actionable insights through intuitive visualizations. They need to understand how to leverage machine learning algorithms to uncover patterns, predict trends, and automate analysis that would be impossible through traditional methods.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field. Resume credentials and theoretical knowledge don't necessarily translate to practical skills in designing and implementing effective AI-powered dashboards. This is where carefully crafted work samples become invaluable—they provide a window into how candidates approach real-world challenges they'll face on the job.

The following work sample exercises are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities across the full spectrum of skills needed for AI product analytics dashboard creation. From strategic planning and technical implementation to problem-solving and communication, these activities will help you identify candidates who can truly deliver value through AI-enhanced analytics. By observing candidates in action, you'll gain insights into their thought processes, technical capabilities, and ability to translate complex data into business impact.

Activity #1: AI-Driven Dashboard Planning and Architecture

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to strategically plan an AI-powered analytics dashboard from concept to implementation. It tests their understanding of business requirements, data architecture, AI capabilities, and dashboard design principles. Strong candidates will demonstrate both technical depth and business alignment, showing how they can translate organizational needs into a coherent analytics solution.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a realistic business scenario and objectives for a new AI-powered product analytics dashboard (e.g., "Our e-commerce platform needs to better understand customer churn risk and provide proactive intervention opportunities").
• Include information about available data sources (user behavior logs, transaction history, customer support interactions, etc.).
• Supply a basic description of the current analytics infrastructure and any technical constraints.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to develop their plan.
• Prepare questions to probe their reasoning during the presentation phase.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Create a comprehensive plan for an AI-powered analytics dashboard that addresses the business objectives.
• Your plan should include:

1. Key metrics and KPIs the dashboard will track
2. AI/ML models or algorithms you would implement and why
3. Data requirements and processing pipeline
4. Dashboard layout and visualization choices (sketches welcome)
5. Implementation phases and timeline
6. Potential challenges and how you would address them

• Prepare to present your plan in 10-15 minutes, explaining your rationale for key decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your approach to predictive churn modeling shows strong understanding of both the technical and business aspects") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might make the dashboard more actionable for non-technical users").
• Ask the candidate to revise one aspect of their plan based on the feedback, giving them 10 minutes to make adjustments and explain their revised approach.

Activity #2: Implementing an Anomaly Detection Feature

This exercise tests a candidate's hands-on technical skills in implementing AI functionality within a dashboard context. Anomaly detection is a common and valuable AI application in product analytics, helping teams identify unusual patterns that require attention. This activity evaluates coding ability, algorithm selection, and practical implementation of AI concepts.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a sanitized dataset from your product (or create a realistic synthetic dataset) that includes time-series metrics like daily active users, conversion rates, session duration, etc.
• Provide access to a development environment with necessary tools (Python, R, or your preferred stack).
• Include documentation on the data schema and any relevant context.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for completion.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement an anomaly detection feature that would integrate into a product analytics dashboard.
• Your solution should:

1. Process the provided dataset to identify statistically significant anomalies
2. Use appropriate algorithms (e.g., isolation forests, DBSCAN, time-series decomposition)
3. Include visualization code to display the anomalies in a dashboard context
4. Provide explanations or context for detected anomalies where possible
5. Include a brief explanation of how you would improve the model with more data or time

• Document your approach, including algorithm selection rationale and any assumptions made.
• Be prepared to walk through your code and explain your implementation decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide specific feedback on the technical implementation, highlighting one strength (e.g., "Your algorithm choice and parameter tuning show strong understanding of the statistical properties of this data") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might reduce false positives in your detection approach").
• Ask the candidate to implement a small improvement based on your feedback, giving them 15-20 minutes to make changes and explain their impact.

Activity #3: Dashboard Optimization Challenge

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze and improve an existing AI-powered dashboard. It tests critical thinking, problem-solving, and optimization skills—essential qualities for maintaining effective analytics systems over time. This activity reveals how candidates approach inherited work and make strategic improvements.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a mockup or provide access to an existing product analytics dashboard with deliberate inefficiencies or issues (e.g., slow-loading visualizations, confusing layout, redundant metrics, or suboptimal AI model implementation).
• Include usage metrics showing how different dashboard components perform and are utilized.
• Provide context about the dashboard's purpose and target users.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to analyze and develop recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided dashboard and identify opportunities for optimization in:

1. Performance (loading times, query efficiency)
2. User experience and information architecture
3. AI/ML model effectiveness and accuracy
4. Data visualization clarity and impact
5. Business value and actionability of insights

• Prepare a prioritized list of recommended improvements with justification for each.
• For the top 3 recommendations, provide specific implementation approaches.
• Be prepared to discuss the tradeoffs involved in your proposed changes.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's analysis, highlighting one particularly insightful recommendation and one area where their approach could be enhanced.
• Ask the candidate to elaborate on how they would implement their highest-priority recommendation, considering the feedback provided. Give them 10-15 minutes to develop a more detailed implementation plan.

Activity #4: AI Insight Communication and Stakeholder Guidance

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to translate complex AI-driven analytics into clear, actionable insights for stakeholders. It evaluates communication skills, business acumen, and the ability to bridge the gap between technical capabilities and business outcomes—crucial for ensuring analytics dashboards drive organizational value.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where an AI-powered dashboard has uncovered a significant but complex insight (e.g., a machine learning model has identified unexpected factors influencing user retention).
• Provide the relevant dashboard views, data visualizations, and AI model outputs.
• Create profiles of 2-3 different stakeholders who need to understand and act on this insight (e.g., a non-technical product manager, a marketing director, and a C-level executive).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for preparation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI-generated insights and prepare a communication strategy for the different stakeholders.
• Create a brief (5-7 minute) presentation that:

1. Explains the key findings in business-relevant terms
2. Clarifies how the AI arrived at these conclusions (appropriate to audience)
3. Provides specific, actionable recommendations based on the insights
4. Addresses potential questions or concerns from each stakeholder

• Develop one dashboard view or visualization that would help stakeholders monitor the impact of implementing your recommendations.
• Be prepared to deliver your presentation and answer questions as if speaking to the actual stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., "Your ability to translate complex model outputs into clear business implications was excellent") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might better address the specific priorities of the marketing director").
• Ask the candidate to revise one portion of their presentation based on the feedback, giving them 10 minutes to adjust their approach and re-present that section.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-90 minutes for the candidate to complete, plus time for feedback and iteration. We recommend scheduling separate sessions for each exercise or selecting the 1-2 most relevant to your specific needs. For senior roles, you might consider combining Activities #1 and #4 into a more comprehensive assessment.

Should candidates complete these exercises remotely or on-site?

Activities #1, #3, and #4 can be effectively conducted either remotely or on-site. Activity #2 (Implementing an Anomaly Detection Feature) typically works best in an environment where the candidate has access to their preferred development tools, so a take-home assignment or providing a fully-equipped workstation is recommended.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different technical approaches than we currently use?

Focus on the candidate's reasoning and problem-solving approach rather than specific technology choices. A strong candidate might introduce you to valuable new approaches. Evaluate whether their solution effectively addresses the business need, demonstrates sound technical understanding, and shows awareness of implementation considerations—even if the specific tools differ from your current stack.

What if we don't have real data to use for these exercises?

While using sanitized versions of your actual data provides the most realistic assessment, you can also use publicly available datasets that mirror your product's data structure. Alternatively, synthetic data generators can create realistic datasets that preserve the statistical properties and relationships found in product analytics data without exposing sensitive information.

How should we weight these different activities in our overall evaluation?

The weighting should align with the specific requirements of your role. For more strategic positions, Activities #1 and #4 might carry more weight. For technically-focused roles, Activities #2 and #3 might be more important. We recommend creating a scorecard that reflects the relative importance of different skills for your specific position.

Can these exercises be modified for junior candidates?

Yes, these exercises can be scaled appropriately for different experience levels. For junior candidates, consider providing more structure, narrowing the scope, or focusing on specific components rather than end-to-end solutions. The feedback portion becomes even more valuable for junior candidates as it demonstrates their ability to learn and adapt.

The ability to effectively create and leverage AI-powered product analytics dashboards has become a competitive differentiator for modern organizations. By incorporating these work sample exercises into your hiring process, you'll be able to identify candidates who not only understand the technical aspects of AI and analytics but can also translate that knowledge into business impact through effective dashboard creation.

These exercises go beyond theoretical knowledge to reveal how candidates approach real-world challenges, implement technical solutions, optimize existing systems, and communicate complex insights. The iterative feedback component also provides valuable insight into candidates' adaptability and coachability—critical traits in a rapidly evolving field.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI Job Descriptions generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Product Analytics Dashboard skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account here