Technical due diligence for AI solutions involves the systematic evaluation of artificial intelligence technologies, methodologies, and implementations to validate their technical viability, potential risks, and alignment with business objectives before investment or deployment decisions are made.

In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape, professionals who can thoroughly evaluate AI solutions are invaluable assets to organizations. These individuals must blend technical expertise with critical thinking to assess not just if an AI solution works, but if it works reliably, ethically, and sustainably. Technical due diligence requires systematic analysis across multiple dimensions: examining the underlying algorithms and data quality, evaluating infrastructure requirements and scalability, assessing implementation challenges, and identifying potential risks or limitations. This competency becomes increasingly important as companies rely more heavily on AI technologies for critical business functions.

When evaluating candidates for roles requiring technical due diligence skills for AI solutions, behavioral interviewing offers significant advantages over technical questions alone. By asking candidates to describe past experiences, interviewers can assess not only technical knowledge but also how candidates approach complex evaluations in real-world situations. Listen for specific examples that demonstrate methodical analysis, attention to technical details, stakeholder communication, and the ability to identify potential risks that others might miss. Use follow-up questions to explore the depth of their technical understanding and their decision-making process when evaluating AI systems.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a critical flaw or limitation in an AI solution that others had overlooked during an evaluation process.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context of the AI solution being evaluated
• How the candidate approached the evaluation process
• The nature of the flaw or limitation they discovered
• Why this issue had been missed by others
• How they validated and communicated their findings
• The impact of their discovery on the final decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific methods or tools did you use to uncover this issue?
• How did you communicate your findings to stakeholders who may have been invested in the solution's success?
• In retrospect, what indicators or warning signs pointed to this issue that could be applied to future evaluations?
• How did this experience change your approach to evaluating AI solutions?

Describe a situation where you had to evaluate the data infrastructure supporting an AI system. What was your approach and what did you discover?

Areas to Cover:

• The type of AI system and its data requirements
• The methodology used to assess the data infrastructure
• Specific metrics or criteria used in the evaluation
• Key strengths and weaknesses identified
• Recommendations made based on findings
• How the candidate balanced technical considerations with practical implementation needs

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific data quality issues did you look for, and how did you measure them?
• How did you assess whether the data infrastructure would scale with increased usage or expanded scope?
• What tools or frameworks did you use to conduct your evaluation?
• How did you translate your technical findings into actionable recommendations for decision-makers?

Tell me about a time when you had to evaluate the ethical implications of an AI solution as part of your due diligence process.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the AI solution and potential ethical concerns
• Frameworks or methodologies used to assess ethical implications
• Specific ethical risks identified during the evaluation
• How the candidate balanced ethical considerations with business objectives
• Recommendations made to address ethical concerns
• Stakeholder reactions to the ethical assessment

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific ethical frameworks or guidelines did you use to structure your evaluation?
• How did you assess potential bias in the AI system, and what metrics did you use?
• What was the most challenging aspect of communicating ethical concerns to technical and business stakeholders?
• How did you prioritize which ethical concerns needed immediate attention versus longer-term monitoring?

Describe your experience evaluating the scalability and performance of an AI solution that was expected to handle significant growth.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI solution and its expected growth trajectory
• Methodologies and benchmarks used to assess scalability
• Performance bottlenecks or limitations identified
• How the candidate tested or simulated increased load conditions
• Recommendations made to improve scalability
• Actual outcomes if the solution was implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific metrics did you use to evaluate performance under different conditions?
• How did you determine appropriate benchmarks for acceptable performance?
• What tools or approaches did you use to simulate increased scale?
• How did you balance performance optimization with other considerations like cost and maintenance complexity?

Tell me about a situation where you recommended against implementing or acquiring an AI solution after conducting technical due diligence. What led to this recommendation?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the AI solution being evaluated
• The systematic approach used in the due diligence process
• The specific technical issues or red flags identified
• How the candidate validated their concerns
• The process of formulating and delivering the negative recommendation
• How stakeholders responded to the recommendation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the most significant technical issues that influenced your recommendation?
• How did you communicate your findings to stakeholders who may have been enthusiastic about the solution?
• What alternatives did you suggest, if any?
• Looking back, do you still believe you made the right recommendation? Why or why not?

Describe a time when you had to evaluate an AI solution that was implemented using technology or techniques you weren't deeply familiar with. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The unfamiliar technology or methodology involved
• The candidate's approach to building necessary knowledge
• Resources or experts they consulted
• How they verified their understanding
• The balance between learning and evaluation timeframes
• The outcome of the evaluation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific steps did you take to gain sufficient technical understanding in a limited timeframe?
• How did you validate your assumptions about the unfamiliar technology?
• What experts or resources proved most valuable in building your knowledge?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to evaluating unfamiliar technologies since then?

Tell me about a time when your technical due diligence revealed that an AI solution would require significant additional resources or infrastructure to implement successfully.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the AI solution being evaluated
• The process used to identify resource requirements
• Specific infrastructure or resource gaps identified
• How the candidate quantified these additional needs
• The communication of these findings to stakeholders
• How this affected the final decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific methods did you use to estimate the additional resources required?
• How did you validate your estimates with existing implementations or benchmarks?
• How did stakeholders react to your findings, and how did you handle pushback, if any?
• What creative solutions did you propose to address the resource constraints, if any?

Describe a situation where you conducted due diligence on an AI vendor's claims about their solution's capabilities. What was your approach and what did you discover?

Areas to Cover:

• The vendor's specific claims about their AI solution
• Methodology used to verify these claims
• Tests or benchmarks designed to validate performance
• Disparities found between claims and reality
• How the candidate handled potential misrepresentations
• Impact on the vendor selection process

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific tests or validation methods did you design to verify the vendor's claims?
• How did you control for potential biases in your evaluation process?
• How did you handle situations where the vendor's claims couldn't be fully validated?
• What documentation or evidence did you gather to support your findings?

Tell me about a time when you had to evaluate the integration capabilities of an AI solution with existing systems during a due diligence process.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI solution and the existing systems it needed to integrate with
• Approach to assessing integration complexity and feasibility
• Specific integration challenges identified
• How the candidate evaluated API capabilities or data exchange requirements
• Recommendations regarding integration approach
• Actual integration outcomes if implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific integration points did you identify as most critical or challenging?
• How did you assess the quality and completeness of the solution's documentation and APIs?
• What testing methods did you use to validate integration feasibility?
• How did you estimate the effort and resources required for successful integration?

Describe your experience conducting due diligence on the model development process used to create an AI solution you were evaluating.

Areas to Cover:

• The type of AI model being evaluated
• Methods used to assess the model development process
• Specific areas examined (data preparation, feature engineering, validation methods)
• Strengths and weaknesses identified in the development approach
• How findings impacted your overall assessment
• Recommendations for improving the model development process

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific aspects of the model development lifecycle did you focus on most closely?
• How did you evaluate whether appropriate validation methods were used during development?
• What documentation or evidence did you request to properly assess the development process?
• How did you determine if best practices for model development were followed?

Tell me about a time when you discovered that an AI solution you were evaluating had significant technical debt or maintenance challenges.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the AI solution being evaluated
• Signs or indicators of technical debt identified
• Methods used to assess maintainability and future support needs
• Specific maintenance challenges uncovered
• How the candidate quantified the impact of technical debt
• Recommendations regarding addressing technical debt

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific indicators led you to identify technical debt in the solution?
• How did you estimate the long-term costs or implications of this technical debt?
• How did you communicate these findings to non-technical stakeholders?
• What recommendations did you make for managing or reducing the technical debt?

Describe a situation where you had to evaluate the explainability and interpretability of an AI model as part of your due diligence process.

Areas to Cover:

• The type of AI model and its application context
• Methodologies used to assess explainability
• Tools or frameworks employed in the evaluation
• Specific limitations in explainability identified
• How the candidate balanced explainability needs with model performance
• Recommendations regarding explainability improvements

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific explainability techniques or tools did you use in your evaluation?
• How did you determine the appropriate level of explainability required for this specific application?
• How did you communicate complex explainability concepts to non-technical stakeholders?
• What trade-offs between model performance and explainability did you identify?

Tell me about a time when you conducted technical due diligence on an AI solution in a highly regulated industry. What additional considerations did you need to address?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific industry and relevant regulatory requirements
• Additional compliance aspects evaluated
• Methods used to assess regulatory conformance
• Compliance gaps or risks identified
• How the candidate balanced innovation with regulatory constraints
• Recommendations made to address compliance requirements

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific regulatory frameworks or standards did you apply in your evaluation?
• How did you verify that the AI solution could meet audit or documentation requirements?
• What challenges did you face in interpreting regulatory requirements in the context of AI technology?
• How did regulatory considerations impact your overall recommendation?

Describe a situation where you had to evaluate the security implications of an AI solution during your due diligence process.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI solution and its potential security vulnerabilities
• Methodology used to assess security risks
• Specific security concerns identified
• How the candidate prioritized different security aspects
• Testing or validation performed to confirm security issues
• Recommendations for addressing security concerns

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific security testing approaches or frameworks did you apply?
• How did you assess potential vulnerabilities related to the AI-specific components versus general application security?
• What was your approach to evaluating data security throughout the AI pipeline?
• How did you balance security requirements with usability and performance considerations?

Tell me about a time when you needed to assess whether an AI solution's performance would remain stable over time or in new environments.

Areas to Cover:

• The type of AI solution and its expected operating environment
• Methods used to evaluate model stability and drift
• Specific stability risks identified
• How the candidate tested performance across different conditions
• Recommendations for monitoring and maintaining performance
• Actual outcomes if the solution was implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific metrics or tests did you use to assess model stability?
• How did you simulate potential future conditions or data scenarios?
• What monitoring approaches did you recommend to detect performance degradation over time?
• How did you evaluate the solution's ability to adapt to changing environments or data distributions?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on past behavior rather than asking candidates what they would do in hypothetical scenarios?

Past behavior is a more reliable predictor of future performance than hypothetical responses. When candidates describe what they've actually done in previous situations, you get insight into their real experience, decision-making processes, and problem-solving approaches. Hypothetical questions often elicit idealized answers that might not reflect how candidates would truly perform. With behavioral interviewing, candidates can't easily fabricate detailed examples, especially when you use follow-up questions to probe deeper into their experiences.

How many of these questions should I use in a single interview?

For a typical 45-60 minute interview, select 3-4 questions that best align with the specific aspects of technical due diligence most relevant to your role. This allows enough time for candidates to provide detailed responses and for you to ask follow-up questions. Quality of discussion is more valuable than quantity of questions covered. Consider using complementary questions across your interview panel if you have multiple interviewers, creating a structured interview process that covers different aspects of the competency.

How should I evaluate candidates who have limited formal experience with AI due diligence but show strong potential?

For candidates with limited formal experience, look for transferable skills from adjacent domains. Have they conducted technical evaluations in other technologies? Do they demonstrate strong analytical thinking, attention to detail, and systematic evaluation approaches? Focus on their learning agility and how quickly they've mastered complex technical concepts in the past. For more junior roles, emphasize traits like curiosity, critical thinking, and methodical problem-solving over specific AI due diligence experience. Always use a consistent evaluation framework to objectively compare candidates.

How do I distinguish between candidates who can talk intelligently about AI due diligence versus those who have actually done it effectively?

The difference often emerges in the details and complexities they describe when answering follow-up questions. Candidates with genuine experience will readily provide specific examples of methodologies they used, challenges they encountered, and lessons learned. They can typically explain their decision-making process and the rationale behind their approaches. Use probing follow-up questions to dig beneath surface-level responses and ask for specific examples of tools, frameworks, or metrics they employed. Listen for nuanced understanding of trade-offs and limitations, which usually indicates real-world experience.

Should technical due diligence skills be evaluated separately from general AI technical knowledge?

While related, these are distinct competencies that should be evaluated somewhat differently. Technical knowledge focuses on understanding AI concepts, algorithms, and implementations, while due diligence skills involve evaluation methodologies, critical analysis, and decision-making frameworks. A candidate might have excellent technical AI knowledge but lack the systematic evaluation approach needed for effective due diligence. It's best to assess both skill sets using different questions or interview segments, potentially having technical experts evaluate AI knowledge while those with evaluation experience assess due diligence capabilities.

Interested in a full interview guide with Technical Due Diligence for AI Solutions as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.