Situational judgement refers to an individual's ability to evaluate complex circumstances, understand key factors, assess available options, and make sound decisions. In workplace settings, this competency is assessed by examining how candidates analyze scenarios, weigh competing priorities, and determine appropriate courses of action based on context and available information.

Strong situational judgement is a foundational competency that significantly impacts job performance across virtually all roles and industries. It encompasses several critical dimensions: the ability to quickly assess complex situations, identify key stakeholders and their needs, understand underlying problems beyond symptoms, evaluate potential solutions against constraints, and make decisions that balance short and long-term objectives. The importance of this competency grows with seniority and responsibility, as higher-level positions typically face more complex scenarios with greater ambiguity and higher stakes.

When evaluating candidates for situational judgement, interviewers should focus on understanding their decision-making process rather than just the outcomes. By using behavioral interview questions that prompt candidates to share real experiences, you can gain insights into how they approach challenges, what factors they consider important, and how they learn from both successes and failures. Follow-up questions allow you to probe beyond prepared responses and understand the depth of a candidate's reasoning abilities and how they've applied lessons from past experiences to new situations.

For best results, design a structured interview process that includes multiple situational judgement questions relevant to the role's challenges. This approach helps you make more objective hiring decisions based on consistent evaluation criteria rather than gut feelings or first impressions.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to make an important decision with incomplete information. How did you approach the situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• What information was available and what was missing
• How the candidate gathered additional information or compensated for gaps
• The decision-making process they used
• Their risk assessment and mitigation strategies
• The outcome of the decision
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What alternatives did you consider, and why did you ultimately choose the path you did?
• How did you determine which missing information was critical versus nice-to-have?
• If you faced a similar situation today, what would you do differently?
• How did you communicate your decision and its rationale to stakeholders?

Describe a situation where you had to balance competing priorities from different stakeholders. How did you determine what to prioritize?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the competing priorities
• The stakeholders involved and their interests
• The criteria used to evaluate priorities
• How the candidate communicated with stakeholders
• The resolution process and decision-making framework
• How they managed stakeholder expectations
• The outcome and stakeholder reactions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate decisions to stakeholders whose priorities weren't addressed first?
• What frameworks or tools did you use to help make your prioritization decisions?
• What was the most challenging aspect of balancing these competing needs?
• How did this experience influence how you handle similar situations now?

Tell me about a time when you recognized a potential problem before it became serious. What did you notice, and what did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the potential problem
• What signals or red flags the candidate noticed
• How they verified their concerns
• The actions they took to address the issue proactively
• How they communicated the potential problem to others
• The outcome of their intervention
• How they monitored the situation afterward

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specifically caused you to notice this issue when others missed it?
• Did you face any resistance when bringing this potential problem to others' attention?
• How did you determine the right time to act versus continuing to gather information?
• What systems or practices have you put in place to catch similar issues early?

Describe a situation where you had to adapt your approach mid-way through a project or task because circumstances changed.

Areas to Cover:

• The original plan and circumstances
• The nature of the change that occurred
• How the candidate identified the need to adapt
• The process they used to revise their approach
• How they communicated changes to stakeholders
• The challenges faced during the transition
• The outcome of the adaptation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance staying committed to goals versus being flexible in your approach?
• What signals told you that your original approach needed to change?
• How did you gain buy-in from others for the change in direction?
• What did this experience teach you about building adaptability into future plans?

Tell me about a difficult ethical decision you've had to make in a professional context. What factors did you consider?

Areas to Cover:

• The situation and the ethical dilemma involved
• The competing values or principles at stake
• How the candidate gathered information to inform their decision
• The decision-making process they employed
• How they considered short and long-term consequences
• The action they ultimately took
• How they reflected on and learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• Did you consult with anyone else during this process? Why or why not?
• How did you weigh personal values against organizational expectations?
• What was the most challenging aspect of making this decision?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to similar situations since then?

Describe a time when you had to make a decision that was unpopular with some of your colleagues or team members. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and decision that needed to be made
• Why the candidate believed it was the right decision
• How they anticipated and prepared for resistance
• Their approach to communicating the decision
• How they addressed concerns and feedback
• Steps taken to maintain relationships and team cohesion
• The ultimate outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you know this was the right decision despite the unpopularity?
• What specific strategies did you use to communicate your reasoning?
• How did you respond to the strongest objections you received?
• Looking back, is there anything you would have done differently to build more support?

Tell me about a time when you had to quickly assess a crisis situation and determine an immediate course of action.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the crisis and the time constraints
• The information available and what was unknown
• How the candidate assessed risks and priorities
• The decision-making process under pressure
• How they communicated and delegated during the crisis
• The immediate and long-term outcomes
• What they learned about crisis management

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you maintain clarity of thought under pressure?
• What was your process for distinguishing between urgent and important tasks?
• How did you communicate with stakeholders during the crisis?
• What systems or practices have you implemented to better handle similar situations in the future?

Describe a situation where you realized after making a decision that it wasn't the best choice. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The original decision and the context in which it was made
• How the candidate realized it wasn't optimal
• Their process for re-evaluating the situation
• How they addressed the consequences of the initial decision
• Their approach to communicating the change
• The steps taken to implement a new solution
• The lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals or feedback helped you recognize that your initial decision wasn't working?
• How quickly did you acknowledge the need to change course?
• How did you manage any disappointment or frustration (your own or others')?
• How has this experience affected your decision-making process going forward?

Tell me about a time when you had to resolve a situation where team members had different interpretations of the same information.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the different interpretations
• How the candidate identified the misalignment
• Their approach to understanding each perspective
• The process used to reconcile the different viewpoints
• How they facilitated productive discussion
• The resolution and how consensus was built
• The impact on team dynamics and future communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• What techniques did you use to ensure everyone felt heard during the discussion?
• How did you handle any strongly held positions that were difficult to reconcile?
• What steps did you take to ensure the team remained cohesive through this process?
• What preventative measures have you implemented to reduce similar misunderstandings?

Describe a time when you had to make a significant decision that would affect your long-term career trajectory or professional development.

Areas to Cover:

• The decision context and options available
• How the candidate evaluated potential outcomes
• The factors they considered most important
• How they gathered information and advice
• The trade-offs they had to make
• The decision-making process they used
• The outcome and reflection on their choice

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance short-term considerations with long-term goals?
• Who did you consult during this process, and how did their input affect your thinking?
• What was the most challenging aspect of making this decision?
• How has this decision influenced how you approach other major life choices?

Tell me about a time when you had to allocate limited resources among multiple worthy projects or initiatives.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and constraints involved
• The competing priorities or projects
• The candidate's process for evaluating options
• The criteria used to make allocation decisions
• How they communicated decisions to stakeholders
• How they managed expectations and disappointment
• The outcomes and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What quantitative and qualitative factors did you consider in your evaluation?
• How did you handle pushback from those whose projects received fewer resources?
• Did you revisit your allocation decisions later, and if so, what prompted that?
• What framework from this experience do you continue to use for resource allocation?

Describe a situation where you identified an opportunity that others had missed. What did you see that others didn't?

Areas to Cover:

• The context in which the opportunity existed
• How the candidate identified the opportunity
• What insight or perspective allowed them to see it
• Their approach to validating the opportunity
• How they communicated it to relevant stakeholders
• The actions taken to capitalize on the opportunity
• The outcome and impact of pursuing it

Follow-Up Questions:

• Why do you think others overlooked this opportunity?
• How did you build support for pursuing this opportunity?
• What risks did you identify, and how did you address them?
• How has this experience affected how you look for opportunities now?

Tell me about a situation where you had to interpret complex or technical information for people with different levels of technical understanding.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the complex information involved
• The varied audience and their different needs
• How the candidate assessed audience understanding
• Their approach to translating technical concepts
• Methods used to verify comprehension
• Adjustments made based on feedback
• The effectiveness of their communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the appropriate level of detail for different audiences?
• What techniques did you use to make complex concepts more accessible?
• How did you address questions or confusion that arose during your explanation?
• What have you learned about effective communication across knowledge gaps?

Describe a time when you needed to make a decision that involved significant risk. How did you approach it?

Areas to Cover:

• The situation and the nature of the risk involved
• How the candidate assessed the potential risks and rewards
• Their process for gathering relevant information
• Mitigation strategies they developed
• How they communicated the risks to stakeholders
• The decision they ultimately made
• The outcome and how they handled consequences

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or evaluate the risks involved?
• What contingency plans did you develop?
• At what point would you have decided the risk was too great?
• How has this experience affected your approach to risk assessment in subsequent situations?

Tell me about a time when you had to mediate a conflict between team members or departments.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and origin of the conflict
• The parties involved and their perspectives
• How the candidate assessed the situation
• Their approach to facilitating resolution
• Techniques used to build common ground
• How they maintained neutrality and trust
• The resolution and its impact on relationships

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure both parties felt heard during the mediation?
• What techniques did you use to help the parties see each other's perspectives?
• How did you address underlying issues beyond the immediate conflict?
• What preventative measures did you implement to reduce similar conflicts in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions about situational judgement better than hypothetical scenarios?

Behavioral questions based on past experiences provide evidence of how candidates have actually handled situations requiring judgment, not just how they think they would act. Past behavior is a more reliable predictor of future performance than hypothetical responses, which often reflect idealized intentions rather than realistic actions. Candidates can prepare "perfect" answers to hypothetical questions, but discussing real experiences typically reveals more authentic insights into their decision-making processes, values, and abilities.

How many situational judgement questions should I include in an interview?

Quality trumps quantity. Include 3-4 well-crafted questions with thorough follow-up rather than rushing through more questions superficially. This deeper approach allows candidates to fully explain their experiences and gives interviewers the opportunity to probe for specifics. For comprehensive assessment, coordinate with other interviewers to cover different aspects of situational judgement across the interview process, as recommended in our guide to using structured interviews.

What should I do if a candidate can't provide an example for a specific question?

First, try rephrasing the question or broadening its scope ("Can you think of any situation where you had to make a difficult choice with limited information?"). If they still struggle, pivot to a related competency or ask what they would do in a hypothetical scenario as a backup. However, make note of areas where candidates lack relevant experience, as this may indicate development needs or potential misalignment with role requirements.

How can I ensure I'm evaluating candidates fairly and consistently?

Use a standardized interview scorecard with clear evaluation criteria for situational judgement. Ask all candidates the same core questions, and use the suggested follow-up questions to probe deeper based on their responses. Complete evaluations immediately after each interview before discussing with other interviewers to prevent bias. Focus on the quality of their reasoning process and approach rather than whether you personally agree with their decisions.

How can I differentiate between candidates who have prepared polished answers and those with genuine situational judgement skills?

Thorough follow-up questions are your best tool. Probe for specific details that prepared answers might lack: "What specific information were you missing?" "Walk me through your thought process at that moment." "What was most challenging about that situation?" Look for consistency in their story and whether they can provide concrete details, emotional responses, and lessons learned. Strong candidates can discuss both successes and failures with self-awareness and can explain not just what they did but why they made those choices.

Interested in a full interview guide with Situational Judgement as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.