Discretion in the workplace is the ability to make sound judgments about when, how, and with whom to share sensitive information. It encompasses maintaining appropriate confidentiality, exercising tact in communications, and demonstrating reliability in handling privileged information—essentially knowing what to say, when to say it, and to whom.

In today's interconnected business environment, discretion has become an increasingly valuable trait. Organizations handle vast amounts of sensitive data—from client information and competitive intelligence to personnel matters and strategic plans. Employees with strong discretion skills help maintain trust both internally and externally, protect company interests, and navigate complex interpersonal situations with diplomacy.

Evaluating discretion during interviews requires a thoughtful approach, as this competency manifests differently across roles and experience levels. For entry-level candidates, you might assess basic understanding of confidentiality principles and professional boundaries. Mid-level professionals should demonstrate industry-specific confidentiality knowledge and navigate competing interests effectively. Senior candidates should show sophisticated judgment in high-stakes situations and the ability to establish discretion policies.

When evaluating candidates for this competency, listen carefully for how they've handled sensitive information in the past. Pay attention to their decision-making process, awareness of potential consequences, and commitment to ethical principles. The best indicators of discretion come from specific examples where candidates demonstrated good judgment—or learned important lessons from missteps.

By using behavioral interview questions focused on discretion, you can build a more effective interview process and identify candidates who will maintain appropriate confidentiality, communicate tactfully, and exercise good judgment in handling sensitive information.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you were entrusted with confidential or sensitive information in a professional setting. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the sensitive information (without revealing actual confidential details)
• Specific measures taken to protect the information
• How they determined who needed access and who didn't
• Potential challenges in maintaining confidentiality
• The outcome of their handling of the sensitive information
• Any systems or processes they put in place to ensure continued protection

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide who needed to know this information and who didn't?
• What specific safeguards did you put in place to protect this information?
• Were there any moments when you felt pressure to share more than you should have? How did you handle that?
• Looking back, would you handle anything differently about that situation?

Describe a situation where you had to decide whether to share certain information with a colleague or team member. What factors did you consider in making that decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the information in question
• Their decision-making process and criteria
• How they weighed various factors (need to know, potential consequences, etc.)
• The ultimate decision they made and why
• Any consultation with others before making the decision
• How they communicated their decision to share or not share

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the potential risks of sharing too much versus sharing too little?
• Did you consult with anyone else before making your decision?
• How did you communicate your decision to the person requesting the information?
• Has your approach to making these types of decisions evolved over time? How so?

Tell me about a time when you observed someone else being indiscreet or sharing information inappropriately. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the situation and their relationship to the person involved
• How they assessed the severity of the indiscretion
• The immediate action they took, if any
• Any follow-up or longer-term actions to address the issue
• The impact of the indiscretion and their response
• Lessons learned from observing this situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine whether and how to intervene?
• What was the outcome of your response?
• Did this situation affect how you approach discretion in your own work?
• If you faced a similar situation in the future, would you respond differently?

Can you share an experience where maintaining discretion was particularly challenging for you? What made it difficult and how did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific challenges that made discretion difficult
• Any competing priorities or values they had to consider
• Strategies they used to maintain appropriate confidentiality
• How they managed their own emotions or impulses
• The outcome of the situation
• What they learned from this challenging experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific techniques did you use to maintain discretion despite the challenges?
• How did you balance the need for discretion with other important considerations?
• What support or resources did you seek out to help navigate this situation?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to similar situations since then?

Describe a time when you received feedback about your level of discretion or how you handled sensitive information. What was the feedback and how did you respond to it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific feedback they received
• Their initial reaction to the feedback
• Actions taken to address the feedback
• Changes made to their approach to discretion
• The outcome of implementing changes
• Reflections on the growth that resulted from this feedback

Follow-Up Questions:

• Did you agree with the feedback you received? Why or why not?
• What specific changes did you make as a result of this feedback?
• How did you measure whether your changes were effective?
• What did this experience teach you about yourself and about discretion in the workplace?

Tell me about a situation where you had to correct misinformation or rumors while still maintaining appropriate discretion about related sensitive matters.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the misinformation or rumors
• How they determined what information could be shared to correct misunderstandings
• Their approach to addressing the issue without oversharing
• The messaging and communication channels they chose
• The outcome of their intervention
• The balance they struck between transparency and discretion

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide what information was appropriate to share versus what needed to remain confidential?
• What communication approach did you take to correct the misinformation?
• What was the reaction from others, and how did you manage any pushback?
• What would you change about your approach if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Share an experience where you had to decline sharing information that someone requested from you. How did you handle that conversation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the information requested (without revealing confidential details)
• Their reasoning for declining to share
• The approach they took to the conversation
• How they maintained the relationship while setting boundaries
• Any alternative solutions they offered
• The outcome of the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you explain your decision without damaging the relationship?
• What was the reaction from the person requesting the information?
• Did you offer any alternatives or other forms of assistance instead?
• How did this interaction affect your working relationship moving forward?

Describe a time when you had to share sensitive information with someone. How did you determine the appropriate level of detail to disclose?

Areas to Cover:

• The context requiring information sharing
• Their process for determining what needed to be shared
• How they evaluated the recipient's need to know
• The approach they took to sharing the information
• Precautions taken to protect the information
• The outcome of sharing the information

Follow-Up Questions:

• What criteria did you use to determine how much detail to share?
• How did you prepare for this conversation?
• What precautions did you take to ensure the information remained appropriately protected?
• How did you confirm the recipient understood the sensitive nature of what you shared?

Tell me about a time when you had access to information that would have been interesting to others but wasn't appropriate to share. How did you handle having this information?

Areas to Cover:

• The type of information they had access to
• Any temptation they felt to share the information
• Strategies they used to maintain confidentiality
• How they handled questions or probing from others
• Their internal reasoning process about appropriate boundaries
• Any challenging aspects of the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you respond when others asked you about this topic?
• What strategies did you use to resist any temptation to share?
• How did you manage your own feelings about having information others wanted?
• What principles guided your approach to this situation?

Describe a situation where you had to communicate about a sensitive topic in writing (email, messaging, documentation). What special considerations did you take into account?

Areas to Cover:

• The context requiring written communication about sensitive matters
• How they determined what to include in writing versus verbally
• Specific measures taken to protect the written information
• Their thought process about audience and potential distribution
• Language choices and framing decisions
• Any follow-up to ensure appropriate handling of the written communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide what medium was appropriate for this communication?
• What specific safeguards did you put in place to protect this written information?
• How did you consider potential future audiences beyond the immediate recipient?
• What language choices did you make to communicate clearly while maintaining appropriate discretion?

Share an experience where being discrete actually helped you build trust or strengthen a professional relationship.

Areas to Cover:

• The scenario where discretion was required
• Their approach to handling the situation
• How others became aware of their discretion
• The impact on trust and relationship dynamics
• Long-term benefits that resulted from demonstrating discretion
• Their observations about the connection between discretion and trust

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did the other person(s) become aware of your discretion?
• What specific aspects of trust were strengthened through this experience?
• How has this relationship evolved since this situation?
• How has this experience shaped your views on the importance of discretion in professional relationships?

Tell me about a time when you witnessed a breach of confidentiality or discretion that had significant consequences. What did you learn from observing this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the breach (without revealing confidential information)
• The consequences that resulted from the breach
• Their observations about how the situation was handled
• How the experience influenced their own approach to discretion
• Preventative measures they now take based on this learning
• Organizational or systemic insights gained from the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors do you think contributed to this breach occurring?
• How was the situation addressed after the breach was discovered?
• What specific practices or habits have you adopted based on witnessing this situation?
• What would you advise others to do differently based on what you observed?

Describe a situation where you had to balance transparency with appropriate discretion. How did you approach this balance?

Areas to Cover:

• The context requiring both transparency and discretion
• How they identified competing priorities
• Their decision-making process to determine appropriate boundaries
• Specific approaches used to satisfy both needs
• Any challenges they encountered in finding the right balance
• The outcome and feedback received on their approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles guided your thinking about where to draw the line?
• How did you communicate your approach to those who wanted more information?
• Were there moments when you reconsidered your initial boundaries? What prompted that?
• What did this experience teach you about balancing these competing values?

Share an experience where you realized after the fact that you had shared more information than you should have. What did you do and what did you learn?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the oversharing incident
• Their realization process and timing
• Immediate actions taken to mitigate potential damage
• Longer-term steps to prevent similar situations
• The outcome and any consequences
• Key lessons learned and changes made to their approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• When and how did you realize you had shared too much?
• What immediate actions did you take once you realized your mistake?
• How did this experience change your approach to handling sensitive information?
• What safeguards or practices have you put in place to prevent similar situations?

Tell me about a time when you had to discuss a sensitive work matter in a public or non-secure setting. How did you ensure discretion?

Areas to Cover:

• The context requiring the sensitive discussion
• Their assessment of the environment and risks
• Specific precautions they took before and during the conversation
• How they monitored the surroundings
• Any adjustments made during the conversation
• Outcomes and reflections on their approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you evaluate whether the setting was appropriate for the conversation?
• What specific techniques did you use to protect sensitive information?
• Were there any unexpected challenges you had to address in the moment?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between discretion and just keeping secrets?

Discretion is more nuanced than simply keeping secrets. It involves making thoughtful judgments about appropriate information sharing based on context, role, and relationships. Discretion requires balancing transparency with confidentiality, exercising tact, and considering the consequences of both sharing and withholding information. Someone with good discretion knows not just how to keep secrets, but when certain information should be shared, with whom, and how to do so appropriately.

How can I tell if a candidate truly values discretion or is just saying what I want to hear?

Look for specific examples with detailed context and reasoning in their answers. Candidates with genuine discretion will describe their thought process, weighing factors like need-to-know, potential consequences, and ethical considerations. They'll often mention consulting policies or trusted colleagues when uncertain. Watch for candidates who can discuss mistakes they've made with discretion and what they learned—this shows reflection and growth. Also, pay attention to how they discuss sensitive topics during the interview itself; their real-time handling of information can be very revealing.

Should I expect different levels of discretion based on the candidate's previous industry?

Yes, industry background shapes understanding of discretion. Candidates from highly regulated fields (healthcare, finance, legal) typically have more formal training in confidentiality. Those from technology may focus more on data security aspects. Candidates from media or PR might emphasize crisis communications or public messaging. Rather than expecting the same approach across all candidates, assess whether they understand the level of discretion your industry requires and show adaptability to new expectations. Ask how they've adjusted their approach when moving between different confidentiality cultures.

How do behavioral questions about discretion differ from hypothetical scenarios?

Behavioral questions about discretion (like "Tell me about a time when…") provide insight into a candidate's actual past behavior, which is often the best predictor of future actions. These questions reveal how candidates have actually handled sensitive information in real situations with real stakes. Hypothetical scenarios ("What would you do if…") tend to elicit idealized answers about what candidates think they should do rather than what they actually do in practice. When assessing discretion—a trait that's truly tested in challenging moments—past behavior provides much more reliable evidence than theoretical responses.

How can I evaluate discretion in candidates for entry-level positions who may have limited work experience?

For entry-level candidates, broaden your questions to include experiences from academic projects, volunteer work, student organizations, or even personal situations. Look for an understanding of basic confidentiality principles and awareness of appropriate boundaries. Ask about situations where they were trusted with information by friends or classmates, how they've handled sensitive social media content, or times they observed confidentiality breaches and what they learned. Focus on their reasoning process and awareness of potential consequences rather than expecting the same depth of experience as more seasoned professionals.

Interested in a full interview guide with Discretion as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.