Communicating AI model explanations is the ability to translate complex artificial intelligence concepts, methodologies, and outputs into clear, accessible language for various stakeholders. This skill is crucial for bridging the gap between technical implementation and practical business application of AI technologies.

In today's AI-driven landscape, professionals who can effectively explain how AI models work, their limitations, and their implications are invaluable team members. Whether communicating with executives making investment decisions, product teams implementing solutions, or end-users interacting with AI systems, this competency ensures that artificial intelligence doesn't remain a "black box" but becomes an understandable, trustworthy tool. The ability to communicate AI model explanations encompasses several dimensions: technical translation skills, audience adaptation, visual communication techniques, ethical awareness, and storytelling capabilities.

When evaluating candidates for this competency, interviewers should listen for evidence of the candidate's ability to adjust their communication style based on audience technical knowledge, use appropriate analogies and visualizations, maintain accuracy while simplifying concepts, and address transparency and ethical considerations. The most effective assessment combines behavioral interview questions with targeted follow-up probing to understand not just what candidates have communicated about AI models, but how they approached the communication challenge and what results they achieved.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to explain a complex AI model to someone with limited technical background. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• Assessment of the audience's existing knowledge and learning style
• Techniques used to simplify complex concepts without sacrificing accuracy
• Use of analogies, metaphors, or visual aids
• How the candidate adapted their explanation based on feedback
• The outcome of the interaction and how understanding was verified
• Lessons learned about effective AI explanation techniques

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific techniques did you use to make the technical concepts more relatable?
• How did you check for understanding throughout your explanation?
• What aspects of the AI model were most challenging to translate into non-technical terms?
• How has this experience influenced how you communicate AI concepts now?

Describe a situation where you needed to explain potential biases or limitations in an AI model to stakeholders. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific biases or limitations that needed to be communicated
• How the candidate framed the conversation around sensitive topics
• Techniques used to make technical limitations understandable
• How they balanced transparency with maintaining stakeholder confidence
• The stakeholders' reactions and any resulting decisions
• How this experience influenced later communications about AI ethics

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about communicating these limitations?
• How did you prepare for potential pushback or disappointment?
• What specific examples or evidence did you use to illustrate the biases or limitations?
• How did you help stakeholders understand the implications for their business objectives?

Tell me about a time when you used visual aids or interactive demonstrations to help explain how an AI model works. What was the context, and how effective was your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific visualization techniques or tools employed
• How the visual elements were designed to enhance understanding
• The process of creating visualizations that accurately represented the model
• How the candidate balanced technical accuracy with accessibility
• Audience reaction and comprehension improvements
• Lessons learned about visual communication of AI concepts

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific aspects of the AI model did your visualizations help clarify?
• How did you ensure your visualizations were technically accurate while still accessible?
• What feedback did you receive, and how would you improve your approach next time?
• How do you decide when visual aids are necessary versus verbal explanations alone?

Describe a situation where you had to explain the same AI system to different audiences with varying levels of technical sophistication. How did you adapt your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• The different stakeholder groups and their varying levels of AI knowledge
• Specific adaptations made for each audience
• How technical terminology was adjusted for different groups
• Methods used to assess audience comprehension
• Challenges faced in maintaining consistency while adapting explanations
• Results of these different communication approaches

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific elements did you emphasize or de-emphasize for different audiences?
• How did you ensure that all stakeholders, regardless of technical background, understood the key implications?
• What techniques have you found most effective when switching between technical and non-technical audiences?
• Can you share an example of feedback that helped you refine your multi-audience approach?

Tell me about a time when your initial explanation of an AI model or algorithm wasn't well received or understood. How did you handle this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The initial approach that proved ineffective
• How the candidate recognized the communication wasn't successful
• Steps taken to reassess and adjust the explanation
• Alternative methods or approaches implemented
• The outcome after adjusting the communication approach
• Lessons learned and how this experience informed future explanations

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals helped you realize your explanation wasn't working?
• What specific changes did you make to your communication approach?
• How did you manage any frustration (yours or theirs) during this process?
• What preventative measures do you now take to avoid similar misunderstandings?

Describe how you've communicated the trade-offs between model accuracy and interpretability to decision-makers who needed to choose between different AI approaches.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI models being compared and their key differences
• How technical concepts were translated into business implications
• Methods used to illustrate the trade-offs (data, visuals, examples)
• How the candidate helped frame the decision in terms of business objectives
• Decision-maker comprehension and the ultimate decision made
• Effectiveness of the communication approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or illustrate the differences between models?
• What aspects of this trade-off were most difficult for decision-makers to grasp?
• How did you help stakeholders understand the long-term implications of their choice?
• What approach would you take if you had to have this conversation again?

Tell me about a time when you needed to explain why an AI model made a particular prediction or decision. How did you make this explanation understandable and trustworthy?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of explaining the specific AI decision
• Techniques used to illustrate the model's decision-making process
• How technical concepts like feature importance were translated
• Methods used to build trust in the explanation
• The recipient's level of understanding and satisfaction
• Challenges faced in balancing complexity with clarity

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what level of detail was appropriate for this explanation?
• What tools or approaches did you use to make the model more interpretable?
• How did you address any skepticism or concerns about the explanation?
• What has this experience taught you about explaining AI decision-making?

Describe a situation where you had to explain the potential ethical implications of an AI system to stakeholders. How did you approach this sensitive topic?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific ethical concerns that needed to be communicated
• How the candidate framed the conversation to be constructive rather than alarming
• Techniques used to illustrate abstract ethical concepts
• How technical and ethical considerations were balanced
• Stakeholder reactions and resulting decisions or actions
• Effectiveness of the approach in raising awareness without creating resistance

Follow-Up Questions:

• What preparatory research did you do before having this conversation?
• How did you make abstract ethical concerns tangible and relevant to stakeholders?
• What was the most challenging aspect of communicating these ethical implications?
• How has this experience influenced how you address AI ethics in your work?

Tell me about a time when you created documentation or training materials to help others understand an AI system. What was your approach to developing these materials?

Areas to Cover:

• The target audience and their specific learning needs
• Structure and format of the materials created
• How complex concepts were broken down and sequenced
• Use of examples, visuals, or interactive elements
• Feedback received and iterations made to improve understanding
• Impact of these materials on user/stakeholder understanding

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide what information to include versus exclude?
• What techniques did you use to make the documentation engaging as well as informative?
• How did you test whether the materials achieved their educational goals?
• What would you do differently if creating similar materials in the future?

Describe a situation where you had to quickly explain an AI concept or finding in an unexpected situation (like an impromptu meeting or chance encounter). How did you handle this without preparation time?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the impromptu explanation
• How the candidate structured their thoughts quickly
• Techniques used to simplify complex ideas on the spot
• Ability to gauge audience comprehension in real-time
• The outcome of the interaction
• Reflection on effectiveness and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What mental frameworks do you rely on for unprepared explanations?
• How did you ensure accuracy while speaking extemporaneously?
• What cues did you use to gauge understanding in the moment?
• How did this experience affect how you prepare for unexpected communication opportunities?

Tell me about a time when you had to communicate uncertainties or probabilistic elements of an AI model to stakeholders who wanted definitive answers. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific uncertainties that needed to be communicated
• How the candidate framed probabilistic concepts for clarity
• Techniques used to illustrate the meaning of confidence intervals or similar measures
• Methods for setting appropriate expectations
• Stakeholder reactions and how any resistance was addressed
• Effectiveness in building realistic understanding of model limitations

Follow-Up Questions:

• What analogies or examples did you use to explain probabilistic concepts?
• How did you balance communicating uncertainties while maintaining stakeholder confidence?
• What was most challenging about this conversation?
• How do you prepare stakeholders for uncertainty when introducing AI solutions?

Describe a situation where you served as a "translator" between technical AI experts and business stakeholders during a project. What role did you play?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific project context and communication challenges
• How the candidate facilitated understanding between different groups
• Techniques used to ensure accurate information transfer
• Methods for managing expectations on both sides
• Conflicts or misunderstandings that arose and how they were resolved
• Impact of this translation role on project outcomes

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific misunderstandings did you help resolve between these groups?
• How did you ensure you were accurately representing technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders?
• What techniques did you use to help technical experts understand business priorities?
• What have you learned about being an effective AI translator?

Tell me about a time when you needed to explain a change in AI model performance or behavior to users or stakeholders. How did you approach this communication?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the performance change and its implications
• How the candidate framed the communication to maintain trust
• Technical details included versus excluded from the explanation
• Methods used to set proper expectations going forward
• Stakeholder reactions and questions addressed
• Effectiveness of the communication in maintaining confidence

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what level of technical detail to include in your explanation?
• What was most challenging about communicating this change?
• How did you address any disappointment or concern from stakeholders?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Describe a situation where you needed to educate colleagues about responsible AI principles or practices. What approach did you take to make these concepts accessible?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific responsible AI concepts being communicated
• Assessment of colleagues' existing knowledge and attitudes
• Methods used to make abstract principles practical and relevant
• Examples or case studies utilized to illustrate concepts
• Techniques for encouraging adoption rather than just awareness
• Impact of this educational effort on team practices

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you make responsible AI principles relevant to your colleagues' daily work?
• What resistance or skepticism did you encounter, and how did you address it?
• Which explanatory techniques proved most effective for these concepts?
• How did you measure whether your educational efforts were successful?

Tell me about a time when you had to explain why an AI approach was more appropriate than a traditional non-AI solution for a particular problem. How did you make your case?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific problem context and alternative approaches considered
• How technical advantages were translated into business benefits
• Methods used to illustrate comparative advantages
• How limitations and risks were honestly addressed
• The stakeholders' level of comprehension and buy-in
• The ultimate decision and its outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific metrics or examples did you use to demonstrate the AI advantage?
• How did you address concerns about complexity or interpretability?
• What aspects of your explanation were most persuasive to stakeholders?
• Looking back, what would you change about how you positioned the AI solution?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on communication skills when hiring for AI roles that are primarily technical?

Communication of AI concepts is increasingly recognized as a critical skill, not just a "nice-to-have." As AI systems become more integrated into business operations, the ability to explain how these systems work, their limitations, and their implications becomes essential for adoption, trust, and proper use. Even the most technically brilliant AI professionals will struggle to create business impact if they cannot effectively communicate about their work to diverse stakeholders.

How can I tell if a candidate truly understands AI concepts versus just using the right terminology?

One of the strengths of behavioral interviewing for this competency is that it reveals depth of understanding. When candidates explain how they've communicated AI concepts in the past, listen for: their ability to translate technical concepts into simple analogies, how they adjust explanations for different audiences, whether they can identify the most critical aspects to explain versus technical details that can be omitted, and how they handle questions or misunderstandings. True understanding is revealed in the candidate's ability to flexibly explain concepts rather than reciting definitions.

Should I expect different levels of this competency based on career stage?

Yes, absolutely. Entry-level candidates might demonstrate this competency through academic projects, hackathons, or explaining technical concepts to peers. Mid-level professionals should show more sophistication in adapting to different audiences and handling challenging questions. Senior candidates should demonstrate strategic communication skills, setting standards for AI explanation within teams or organizations, and navigating complex ethical or regulatory discussions. Adjust your evaluation based on experience level and role requirements.

How many of these questions should I include in an interview?

Rather than trying to cover many questions superficially, select 3-4 questions most relevant to your specific role and dig deep with follow-up questions. This approach allows you to thoroughly explore the candidate's experiences and skills while providing enough variety to see how they've handled different communication challenges. The quality of exploration matters more than quantity of questions covered.

How can I evaluate this competency if a candidate has limited experience specifically with AI?

For candidates transitioning into AI roles, look for transferable communication skills from adjacent technical domains. Ask how they've explained complex technical concepts in their previous experience, then follow up with hypothetical questions about how they might approach AI-specific challenges. You can also incorporate a short role-play or case study where they explain a simple AI concept to assess their potential, while recognizing they may not have the depth of examples that experienced AI professionals would have.

Interested in a full interview guide with Communicating AI Model Explanations as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.