Decision making in engineering roles refers to the systematic process of identifying problems, evaluating alternative solutions, and selecting the optimal course of action based on technical knowledge, data analysis, and consideration of trade-offs. According to the IEEE Engineering Competency Model, effective decision making combines analytical thinking, risk assessment, and stakeholder consideration to reach technically sound, ethically appropriate conclusions.

The ability to make good decisions is particularly crucial in engineering roles because these decisions often have significant financial, safety, and operational implications. Engineers must regularly navigate complex technical challenges, balance competing priorities, and make trade-offs between factors such as cost, performance, schedule, and risk. From choosing between technical solutions to determining resource allocation, decision making permeates every aspect of an engineering role.

What makes decision making in engineering unique is the technical complexity involved. Engineers must evaluate decisions through multiple lenses: technical feasibility, business impact, resource constraints, and long-term sustainability. Junior engineers might make decisions about implementation approaches, while senior engineers and engineering managers often make architectural decisions that shape entire systems or products. Regardless of level, the ability to make sound, well-reasoned decisions distinguishes successful engineers from their peers.

When evaluating candidates, interviewers should look for evidence of a structured approach to decision making, including how candidates gather and analyze information, consider alternatives, involve stakeholders, and learn from outcomes. The behavioral interview questions below will help you assess this critical competency across engineering candidates of varying experience levels.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a significant technical decision you made that had a substantial impact on a project or product you were working on. What was your decision-making process?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• How the candidate gathered relevant information
• Alternative options they considered
• Criteria used to evaluate different options
• Stakeholders involved in the decision-making process
• Implementation challenges
• The ultimate impact of the decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this particular decision challenging?
• How did you validate your assumptions before making the final decision?
• If you had to make this decision again, would you approach it differently?
• How did you communicate your decision to team members or stakeholders who might have preferred a different approach?

Describe a situation where you had to make an important engineering decision with incomplete information or under significant time constraints. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the decision and why it was time-sensitive
• What information was missing and why
• How the candidate assessed and mitigated risks
• The framework or approach used to make the decision despite constraints
• How they communicated uncertainties to stakeholders
• The outcome and what was learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prioritize which information was most critical to obtain?
• What techniques or mental models did you use to make decisions with limited data?
• How did you balance speed versus accuracy in your decision-making process?
• How did you prepare for potential fallout if the decision proved suboptimal?

Tell me about a time when you had to choose between multiple technical approaches, each with different trade-offs. How did you evaluate the options and reach a decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical problem being addressed
• The different approaches considered
• The trade-offs involved (performance, maintainability, cost, time, etc.)
• How the candidate structured their evaluation
• Whether and how they involved others
• The final decision and its rationale
• How the decision played out in practice

Follow-Up Questions:

• What metrics or criteria were most important in your evaluation?
• Did you create any tools or frameworks to help make this decision?
• Were there any stakeholders who disagreed with your approach? How did you handle that?
• In hindsight, what additional information would have been helpful?

Describe a situation where you made a technical decision that you later realized was incorrect. How did you recognize the problem, and what actions did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The original decision and its context
• How and when the candidate realized the decision was suboptimal
• Their initial response and emotional reaction
• Steps taken to address the situation
• How they communicated with others about the mistake
• Lessons learned and changes implemented
• How they applied these lessons to future decisions

Follow-Up Questions:

• What early warning signs did you miss that might have indicated problems with your decision?
• How did you balance moving quickly to fix the issue versus taking time to find the right solution?
• How did you maintain team morale while addressing the consequences?
• What systems or processes did you put in place to avoid similar mistakes in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a decision that required balancing technical excellence against business or project constraints like time, budget, or resources.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific decision scenario
• The technical ideal versus practical constraints
• How the candidate gathered input from business and technical stakeholders
• The framework used for evaluating trade-offs
• The final compromise reached
• How they communicated the decision
• The outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify the technical debt or risks associated with your compromise?
• What strategies did you use to get buy-in from stakeholders with different priorities?
• How did you monitor the impact of the compromises made?
• What would you have done differently if you had more time/resources?

Describe a situation where you had to make a decision that significantly impacted other teams or departments. How did you approach this cross-functional decision-making process?

Areas to Cover:

• The decision context and why it affected multiple teams
• How the candidate identified relevant stakeholders
• Steps taken to understand different perspectives and requirements
• The process used to reach a consensus or final decision
• How they handled conflicts or competing priorities
• The communication approach for the final decision
• The outcomes for various teams

Follow-Up Questions:

• What techniques did you use to ensure all stakeholders felt heard?
• How did you handle resistance from particular teams or individuals?
• What surprised you most about the different perspectives you encountered?
• How did you maintain progress when consensus was difficult to reach?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a technical decision with ethical implications. How did you approach it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the decision and its ethical dimensions
• How the candidate recognized the ethical implications
• Research or consultation conducted to understand the issues
• The framework used to evaluate ethical considerations
• How they balanced technical, business, and ethical factors
• The final decision and its justification
• How they communicated ethical concerns to others

Follow-Up Questions:

• Were there any professional codes of ethics or standards that guided your thinking?
• What was the most challenging aspect of navigating this ethical dilemma?
• How did you handle any pressure to compromise on ethical considerations?
• Did this experience change how you approach technical decisions with ethical dimensions?

Describe a situation where you disagreed with your team or manager about a technical decision. How did you handle the disagreement?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the technical decision and the disagreement
• The candidate's initial position and reasoning
• How they expressed their viewpoint constructively
• Steps taken to understand opposing perspectives
• How they evaluated different viewpoints objectively
• The resolution process
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure your disagreement was viewed as constructive rather than obstructive?
• What evidence or data did you gather to support your position?
• Were there any aspects of the opposing viewpoint that you found had merit?
• How did this experience affect your approach to future disagreements?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a quick decision during a critical production issue or outage. What was your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and severity of the issue
• How the candidate assessed the situation under pressure
• Their decision-making process in the moment
• How they balanced speed with careful consideration
• Actions taken based on their decision
• The outcome of their intervention
• The post-incident analysis and learning

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you manage your stress level during this incident?
• What information was most critical to your decision-making process?
• How did you communicate with stakeholders during the incident?
• What preparations or processes were in place that helped you make effective decisions under pressure?

Describe a situation where you had to decide whether to build a custom solution or leverage an existing technology or framework. How did you approach this decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The problem they were trying to solve
• The existing solutions they considered
• The evaluation criteria they established
• The process for assessing build vs. buy options
• Stakeholders involved in the decision
• The final decision and its rationale
• The outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you calculate or estimate the long-term maintenance costs of each option?
• What technical and non-technical factors influenced your decision most heavily?
• How did you test your assumptions about the existing technology's capabilities?
• How has your approach to build vs. buy decisions evolved over your career?

Tell me about a time when you had to make an architectural or design decision that would be difficult to reverse later. How did you approach making this high-stakes decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The architectural decision context and its long-term implications
• How the candidate recognized the decision's significance
• Extra steps taken due to the decision's importance
• Research, prototyping, or testing conducted
• How they involved others in the decision process
• The final decision and implementation approach
• Any measures taken to preserve flexibility despite the commitment

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you account for future requirements or scenarios you couldn't fully predict?
• What were your biggest concerns about this decision, and how did you address them?
• Did you create any contingency plans in case the decision proved problematic?
• How did you balance making the right long-term decision with the need to make progress?

Describe a situation where you had to decide between fixing a technical debt issue or implementing a new feature. How did you evaluate this trade-off?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical debt issue and feature request
• How the candidate gathered information about both options
• The impact assessment for addressing or deferring technical debt
• How business value was weighed against technical considerations
• The decision-making framework applied
• How they built consensus for their recommendation
• The outcome and its impact on the product and team

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or explain the importance of the technical debt to non-technical stakeholders?
• What metrics or indicators helped you understand the severity of the technical debt?
• How did you ensure the decision was objective rather than based on personal preference?
• What strategies have you developed for preventing technical debt in the first place?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a decision about adopting a new technology or tool for your team or project. How did you evaluate it?

Areas to Cover:

• The need that prompted exploring new technology
• The candidate's research and evaluation process
• How they assessed fit with existing systems and team skills
• Risk assessment conducted
• Proof of concept or testing approach
• How they involved the team in the decision
• Implementation strategy and outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What criteria were most important in your evaluation?
• How did you balance the excitement of new technology with practical considerations?
• How did you mitigate risks during the adoption process?
• What would you do differently next time you evaluate a new technology?

Describe a situation where you had to prioritize which technical issues or bugs to address with limited time or resources. How did you make these decisions?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and constraints they were working with
• How they gathered information about the issues
• The prioritization framework or criteria they established
• How they balanced user impact, technical risk, and business priorities
• The decision-making process used
• How they communicated priorities to stakeholders
• The outcome of their prioritization decisions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you handle pressure from different stakeholders to prioritize their issues?
• What data points were most valuable in your prioritization process?
• How did you manage issues that were important but not urgent?
• How have you refined your bug prioritization approach over time?

Tell me about a time when you had to decide whether to continue with an approach that wasn't working well or pivot to a different solution. What factors influenced your decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The initial approach and why it was chosen
• Signs that indicated the approach wasn't working as expected
• How the candidate gathered and analyzed information about the situation
• Alternative options they considered
• The decision-making framework used to evaluate continuing vs. pivoting
• How they managed stakeholder expectations during this process
• The outcome of their decision and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you distinguish between normal implementation challenges and fundamental problems with the approach?
• At what point did you determine a pivot was necessary?
• How did you manage any sunk cost bias in yourself or others?
• What did you do to ensure the new approach wouldn't face similar issues?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when assessing decision-making skills?

Behavioral questions based on past experiences provide insight into how candidates actually make decisions in real situations, not just how they think they would respond. Past behavior is the best predictor of future performance, and candidates' real experiences reveal their decision-making frameworks, thought processes, and ability to learn from outcomes. Hypothetical questions often elicit idealized responses rather than revealing how candidates truly operate under pressure or constraints.

How many decision-making questions should I include in an engineering interview?

Focus on 2-4 high-quality decision-making questions with thorough follow-up rather than trying to cover more questions superficially. This approach allows you to dig deeper into responses and get beyond rehearsed answers. For engineering roles, combine decision-making questions with other competency areas like technical problem-solving, collaboration, and communication for a comprehensive assessment.

Should I adjust my decision-making questions based on the seniority of the engineering role?

Yes, definitely. For junior engineers, focus on questions about implementation decisions, basic prioritization, and learning from mistakes. For mid-level engineers, emphasize architectural decisions, technical trade-offs, and cross-team collaboration. For senior engineers or engineering leaders, concentrate on strategic technical decisions, managing uncertainty, and balancing technical excellence with business needs.

How can I tell if a candidate has good decision-making skills based on their responses?

Look for candidates who demonstrate a structured approach to decision making, including: gathering relevant information, considering multiple options, establishing clear evaluation criteria, involving appropriate stakeholders, making decisions decisively once they have sufficient information, communicating decisions effectively, and learning from outcomes. Strong candidates will acknowledge the complexity of decisions and discuss both successes and lessons from less successful decisions.

How can I use the follow-up questions effectively during the interview?

Use follow-up questions strategically to probe areas the candidate might have skipped or glossed over in their initial response. If they've given a high-level answer, ask for specific details about their thought process or actions. If they focus only on positive outcomes, ask about challenges or what they would do differently next time. The goal is to get beyond rehearsed answers to understand how they truly operate and think.

Interested in a full interview guide with Assessing Decision Making in Engineering Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.