Evaluating candidates for AI-Specific Risk Identification requires a structured approach that goes beyond basic technical assessments. AI-Specific Risk Identification is the ability to systematically detect, analyze, and address potential harms, vulnerabilities, and unintended consequences in artificial intelligence systems before they cause real-world problems. This competency combines technical expertise with ethical reasoning, critical thinking, and foresight.

In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape, professionals skilled in risk identification have become essential across industries. Effective AI risk identification requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses technical knowledge of AI systems, analytical thinking to spot potential issues, ethical awareness to consider societal impacts, and communication skills to articulate complex risks to diverse stakeholders. Whether you're hiring for AI safety teams, oversight roles, or developing positions with AI responsibilities, evaluating this competency through behavioral interviewing helps identify candidates who can safeguard your organization's AI implementations.

To effectively evaluate candidates using behavioral interviews, focus on listening for specific examples that demonstrate their systematic approach to identifying AI risks in previous work. Push beyond technical jargon with follow-up questions that reveal their thought process, collaboration methods, and ethical reasoning. The best candidates will provide concrete examples showing not just risk identification but also their ability to communicate these risks effectively and develop mitigation strategies. Learn more about behavioral interviewing techniques to maximize the value of these questions.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a significant risk or potential harm in an AI system that others had overlooked.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI system or model being evaluated
• How the candidate approached the assessment process
• What specific risk they identified that others missed
• Why this risk was significant and potentially harmful
• How they validated their concerns
• What actions they took after identifying the risk
• The outcome and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What methodology or framework did you use to identify this risk?
• How did you communicate this risk to stakeholders or team members?
• What made this particular risk difficult for others to spot?
• How did this experience influence your approach to risk identification in later projects?

Describe a situation where you had to assess the ethical implications of an AI system. What process did you follow to identify potential issues?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the AI system and its intended use
• The candidate's process for ethical assessment
• Specific ethical concerns they identified
• How they balanced competing ethical considerations
• Who they involved in the assessment process
• Actions taken based on their ethical analysis
• How they measured the effectiveness of their approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• Which ethical frameworks or principles guided your analysis?
• How did you account for impacts on different stakeholder groups?
• What was the most challenging aspect of conducting this ethical assessment?
• How did you handle disagreements about the significance of certain ethical concerns?

Share an example of how you evaluated potential bias in an AI model or dataset. What specific risks did you identify?

Areas to Cover:

• The type of AI model or dataset being evaluated
• The candidate's approach to bias detection
• Specific biases they discovered
• Methods used to measure or quantify bias
• How they determined which biases posed the greatest risks
• Actions taken to address or mitigate the biases
• How they communicated their findings to relevant stakeholders

Follow-Up Questions:

• What tools or techniques did you use to detect bias?
• How did you prioritize which bias issues to address first?
• What were the challenges in communicating these bias issues to non-technical stakeholders?
• How did you validate that your bias mitigation strategies were effective?

Tell me about a time when you had to assess the privacy implications of an AI system. What risks did you identify?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI system and its data requirements
• The candidate's approach to privacy risk assessment
• Specific privacy vulnerabilities they identified
• How they determined the severity of each privacy risk
• Regulatory considerations they factored into their assessment
• Recommended mitigations or safeguards
• The outcome of their assessment

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you stay current with privacy regulations relevant to this AI system?
• What methods did you use to test or verify the privacy vulnerabilities you identified?
• How did you balance privacy concerns with the system's functional requirements?
• What was the most challenging privacy risk to address, and why?

Describe a situation where you identified security vulnerabilities in an AI system. How did you approach this assessment?

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system's security context and deployment environment
• The candidate's security assessment methodology
• Specific vulnerabilities they discovered
• How they determined the potential impact of each vulnerability
• Their approach to prioritizing security risks
• Actions taken to address the vulnerabilities
• How they validated that remediation efforts were successful

Follow-Up Questions:

• What security testing techniques or tools did you use?
• How did you determine which security vulnerabilities posed the greatest risk?
• What was the most challenging aspect of communicating these security concerns?
• How did you balance security requirements with system performance and usability?

Tell me about a time when you had to evaluate the robustness of an AI system against adversarial attacks or manipulation.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI system being evaluated
• The candidate's approach to adversarial testing
• Types of attacks or manipulations they considered
• Methods used to test the system's resilience
• Key vulnerabilities discovered
• Recommended defensive measures
• How they measured improvement after implementing defenses

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide which types of adversarial attacks to test?
• What was your process for creating effective adversarial examples?
• How did you quantify the system's vulnerability to different attacks?
• What was the most surprising vulnerability you discovered, and why?

Share an example of how you identified potential societal impacts or harms from an AI system before deployment.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system's purpose and intended user base
• The candidate's approach to assessing societal impacts
• Specific potential harms they identified
• How they assessed impacts across different communities or populations
• Methods used to validate their concerns
• Recommendations they made to mitigate harmful impacts
• How their assessment influenced the deployment decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you considered impacts on diverse communities?
• What sources of information or expertise did you draw upon?
• How did you balance potential benefits against potential harms?
• What metrics or indicators did you develop to track societal impacts post-deployment?

Describe a situation where you had to assess the transparency and explainability risks of an AI system.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI system and its decision-making context
• The candidate's approach to evaluating transparency
• Key transparency and explainability issues identified
• How they determined which transparency issues posed the greatest risks
• Their approach to improving explainability
• How they measured the effectiveness of their transparency solutions
• Stakeholder reactions to their assessment

Follow-Up Questions:

• What methods or tools did you use to evaluate explainability?
• How did you determine appropriate levels of transparency for different stakeholders?
• What trade-offs did you identify between model performance and explainability?
• How did you address situations where full transparency wasn't feasible?

Tell me about a time when you discovered a potential risk in an AI system during testing or early deployment that wasn't captured in your initial risk assessment.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the AI system and its application
• The candidate's initial risk assessment process
• The specific risk they discovered later
• How they identified this previously overlooked risk
• Why this risk wasn't captured in the initial assessment
• Actions taken to address the newly discovered risk
• Changes made to their risk assessment process as a result

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals or indicators alerted you to this previously unidentified risk?
• How did you communicate this new risk to the team or stakeholders?
• How did you revise your risk assessment methodology based on this experience?
• What was the most important lesson you learned from this situation?

Share an experience where you had to evaluate the reliability and safety of an AI system for a critical application.

Areas to Cover:

• The critical application context and its safety requirements
• The candidate's approach to safety and reliability assessment
• Specific reliability risks they identified
• Methods used to test system reliability under various conditions
• How they determined acceptable reliability thresholds
• Recommendations they made to improve safety and reliability
• The outcome of their assessment and its impact on deployment decisions

Follow-Up Questions:

• What failure modes did you consider in your assessment?
• How did you test the system's behavior in edge cases or unusual scenarios?
• What metrics did you use to quantify reliability and safety?
• How did you approach the trade-off between innovation and caution in this critical application?

Describe a time when you had to assess the risks of an AI system making incorrect predictions or recommendations.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system's purpose and the consequences of incorrect outputs
• The candidate's approach to evaluating prediction risks
• Specific types of errors they identified as particularly concerning
• How they measured or quantified prediction accuracy
• Their process for identifying high-risk prediction scenarios
• Safeguards they recommended to mitigate these risks
• How they communicated prediction risks to stakeholders

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine acceptable error rates for different types of predictions?
• What methods did you use to test prediction quality beyond standard accuracy metrics?
• How did you recommend handling edge cases or low-confidence predictions?
• What monitoring systems did you suggest for tracking prediction quality in production?

Tell me about a situation where you identified potential legal or regulatory compliance risks related to an AI system.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system and its regulatory context
• The candidate's approach to compliance risk assessment
• Specific regulatory requirements or legal issues they identified
• How they stayed informed about relevant regulations
• Their process for determining compliance status
• Recommendations they made to ensure compliance
• The outcome of their assessment and any changes implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you stay current with the evolving regulatory landscape for AI?
• What resources or experts did you consult during your compliance assessment?
• How did you translate complex regulatory requirements into practical assessment criteria?
• What was the most challenging compliance issue to address, and why?

Share an example of how you assessed the risks of an AI system producing biased or unfair outcomes for certain groups.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system's purpose and potential impact on different groups
• The candidate's approach to fairness assessment
• Specific fairness metrics or definitions they applied
• Methods used to identify potential discrimination or disparate impacts
• How they determined which fairness concerns were most significant
• Recommendations they made to improve fairness
• How they validated the effectiveness of fairness interventions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you define fairness in this specific context?
• What data did you use to assess potential disparate impacts?
• How did you handle trade-offs between different fairness criteria?
• What was the most challenging aspect of communicating fairness concerns to stakeholders?

Describe a time when you had to assess the potential for an AI system to be misused or repurposed in harmful ways.

Areas to Cover:

• The AI system's intended function and capabilities
• The candidate's approach to dual-use risk assessment
• Specific misuse scenarios they identified
• How they evaluated the likelihood and impact of different misuse cases
• Safeguards they recommended to prevent harmful repurposing
• How they balanced openness with security considerations
• The outcome of their assessment and its impact on design decisions

Follow-Up Questions:

• What methodology did you use to brainstorm potential misuse scenarios?
• How did you prioritize which misuse risks to address first?
• What technical or policy safeguards did you find most effective?
• How did you approach the tension between beneficial uses and potential misuse?

Tell me about a situation where you had to evaluate whether an AI system might develop unexpected or emergent behaviors.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific AI system and its learning capabilities
• The candidate's approach to assessing emergent behavior risks
• Methods used to test for unexpected behaviors
• Specific concerns they identified about potential emergent properties
• How they determined which potential emergent behaviors posed risks
• Safeguards they recommended to monitor and control system behavior
• The outcome of their assessment and any design changes implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• What testing methodologies did you use to identify potential emergent behaviors?
• How did you determine the boundaries of expected versus unexpected behavior?
• What monitoring systems did you recommend to detect emergent behaviors post-deployment?
• How did you balance the benefits of system adaptability with the risks of unexpected behavior?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on past behaviors rather than hypothetical scenarios when interviewing for AI risk identification?

Past behaviors provide concrete evidence of a candidate's actual approach to identifying AI risks. While hypothetical questions may reveal how candidates think they would respond, behavioral questions show how they've actually handled real situations. This provides more reliable insights into their practical skills, methodologies, and judgment when facing genuine AI risk challenges. Research shows that past behaviors are much more predictive of future performance than hypothetical responses.

How should I evaluate candidates who have limited direct experience with AI risk identification?

For candidates with limited direct AI risk experience, look for transferable skills from related domains such as cybersecurity, privacy, ethical assessment, or quality assurance. Focus questions on how they've approached risk identification in other technical systems and assess their understanding of AI-specific challenges. Consider their ability to learn and adapt, as demonstrated through examples of how they've quickly gained expertise in new areas. Entry-level candidates can be evaluated on academic projects, self-directed learning, or participation in AI safety competitions.

How many of these questions should I use in a single interview?

Three to four questions is optimal for a 45-60 minute interview focused on AI risk identification. This allows sufficient time for candidates to provide detailed responses and for you to ask follow-up questions that probe deeper into their thought processes and experiences. Quality of discussion is more valuable than quantity of questions. With fewer questions, you can explore each scenario more thoroughly, getting beyond rehearsed answers to understand how candidates truly approach AI risk identification.

How can I adapt these questions for different technical levels and roles?

For technical AI roles, focus on questions that probe deeper into technical assessment methodologies, testing approaches, and specific vulnerability identification. For policy or governance roles, emphasize questions about ethical frameworks, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder communication. Adjust your follow-up questions based on the seniority level – asking entry-level candidates about their approach and methodology, while expecting senior candidates to also discuss how they've built systems and processes for risk identification across teams or organizations.

What are red flags to watch for in candidates' responses to these questions?

Watch for candidates who: 1) Focus solely on technical risks while ignoring ethical or societal dimensions, 2) Cannot provide specific examples with concrete details about their risk identification process, 3) Demonstrate overconfidence in AI systems without acknowledging limitations, 4) Show reluctance to consult diverse perspectives when assessing risks, or 5) Describe risk identification as a one-time pre-deployment activity rather than an ongoing process. Strong candidates will demonstrate humility about the challenges of AI risk identification while showing systematic approaches to addressing them.

Interested in a full interview guide with AI-Specific Risk Identification as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.