Medical Laboratory Scientists serve as the backbone of clinical diagnostics, playing a pivotal role in the healthcare ecosystem by performing complex laboratory tests that help diagnose, treat, and monitor diseases. According to the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, approximately 70% of medical decisions are based on laboratory results generated by these professionals, making their expertise essential for accurate patient care.

In today's increasingly complex healthcare environment, Medical Laboratory Scientists must possess not only technical expertise but also exceptional problem-solving abilities, attention to detail, and adaptability to rapidly evolving technologies and methodologies. The role demands professionals who can maintain precision under pressure, collaborate effectively with healthcare teams, and uphold stringent quality standards while navigating emerging diagnostic challenges.

When interviewing candidates for a Medical Laboratory Scientist position, it's crucial to assess their technical competencies alongside their behavioral attributes like critical thinking, communication skills, and ethical judgment. Structured behavioral interviewing provides a framework to evaluate how candidates have handled real situations in the past, offering reliable insights into how they'll perform in your laboratory environment.

The following behavioral interview questions are designed to help you thoroughly evaluate Medical Laboratory Scientist candidates, focusing on past behaviors as predictors of future performance. By using these questions consistently with all candidates and probing deeply with follow-ups, you'll gain valuable insights that go beyond technical qualifications and reveal the essential traits that distinguish exceptional Medical Laboratory Scientists.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you discovered an unexpected or unusual result during laboratory testing. How did you handle it, and what was the outcome?

Areas to Cover:

• Details about the specific test and unexpected result
• The candidate's initial reaction and analytical approach
• Steps taken to verify the result and rule out technical errors
• How they documented the finding
• Whether and how they communicated the result to appropriate personnel
• Any impact the finding had on patient care or laboratory processes
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your first thought when you saw the unusual result?
• What specific steps did you take to verify the accuracy of your finding?
• How did you determine when it was appropriate to escalate the result to others?
• How did this experience change your approach to similar situations later?

Describe a situation where you had to manage multiple high-priority specimens or tests simultaneously. How did you organize your work and ensure accuracy?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context and types of tests involved
• How the candidate assessed priorities
• Systems or methods used to stay organized
• Steps taken to maintain quality and accuracy despite time pressure
• Any collaboration with colleagues
• How they managed stress during the situation
• The outcome and any feedback received

Follow-Up Questions:

• What criteria did you use to determine which specimens needed to be processed first?
• Were there any moments when you felt accuracy might be compromised, and how did you address that?
• How did you communicate with other staff or departments about timing and expectations?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you identified a potential quality issue or procedural error in your laboratory. What actions did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific quality issue or error identified
• How the candidate discovered the problem
• The potential impact on patient results or laboratory operations
• Steps taken to address the immediate issue
• How the candidate communicated the problem to relevant stakeholders
• Any long-term solutions or procedural changes implemented
• How the candidate followed up to ensure the issue was resolved

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially alerted you that something might be wrong?
• How did you decide who needed to be informed about the issue?
• What measures did you suggest or implement to prevent similar problems in the future?
• How did this experience influence your approach to quality management?

Describe a time when you had to learn and implement a new laboratory technique or use new equipment. How did you approach the learning process?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technique or equipment being learned
• Resources and methods used for learning
• Challenges encountered during the learning process
• Steps taken to ensure competency before performing the technique independently
• How the candidate verified their results during the learning phase
• Time management and balance with existing responsibilities
• Application of the new skills in practice

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about learning this new technique or equipment?
• How did you know when you were ready to perform the procedure independently?
• What strategies did you find most effective for retaining the new information?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach learning other new methods?

Tell me about a situation where you had to explain complex laboratory results or procedures to someone without a technical background. How did you approach this communication challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context and who they were communicating with
• The complexity of the information being conveyed
• How the candidate assessed the listener's level of understanding
• Strategies used to simplify technical information without compromising accuracy
• Visual aids or analogies employed to enhance understanding
• How they confirmed the person understood the information
• The outcome of the communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you gauge the person's initial level of understanding?
• What techniques or analogies did you find most effective in simplifying the information?
• How did you confirm they truly understood what you were explaining?
• What would you do differently in a similar future situation?

Describe a time when you had to work with a particularly difficult or contaminated specimen. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the difficult specimen and what made it challenging
• Safety precautions taken
• Technical approach to processing the specimen
• Any adaptations to standard protocols that were necessary
• Consultation with colleagues or supervisors if applicable
• Documentation of the special handling
• The final outcome and quality of results obtained

Follow-Up Questions:

• What safety concerns did you have, and how did you address them?
• How did you determine whether the specimen was still viable for testing?
• What specific modifications to standard procedures did you implement?
• How did this experience inform your handling of similar specimens later?

Tell me about a time when you had to troubleshoot an instrument or methodological problem in the laboratory. What was your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific problem encountered
• Initial assessment and diagnostic steps
• Resources consulted (manuals, colleagues, manufacturers)
• Systematic approach to identifying the root cause
• Solutions attempted and their outcomes
• Documentation of the issue and resolution
• Preventative measures implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you first realize there was a problem with the instrument or method?
• What resources did you find most helpful during the troubleshooting process?
• How did you determine whether the problem was resolved completely?
• What steps did you take to prevent similar issues in the future?

Describe a situation where you identified an opportunity to improve efficiency or quality in a laboratory process. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific process that needed improvement
• How the candidate identified the opportunity
• Analysis conducted to understand the current process
• Proposed solutions and rationale
• How the candidate gained buy-in from colleagues or management
• Implementation steps and challenges
• Measurement of results and impact
• Lessons learned from the improvement project

Follow-Up Questions:

• What metrics or observations led you to identify this opportunity?
• How did you involve others in developing or implementing the solution?
• What resistance did you encounter, and how did you address it?
• How did you measure the success of your improvement initiative?

Tell me about a time when you had to adapt to a significant change in laboratory protocols, regulations, or standards. How did you manage the transition?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific change and its scope
• The candidate's initial reaction to the change
• Steps taken to understand the new requirements
• How they updated their knowledge and skills
• Challenges encountered during the adaptation process
• Strategies for maintaining quality during the transition
• How they helped colleagues adapt if applicable
• The outcome of the transition

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when you learned about this change?
• What resources did you use to help you understand and implement the new requirements?
• How did you ensure accuracy and quality during the transition period?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar change in the future?

Describe a time when you had to collaborate with healthcare providers or other departments to resolve a laboratory-related issue. What was your role in the collaboration?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific issue requiring collaboration
• The departments or professionals involved
• The candidate's specific responsibilities
• Communication methods used
• Challenges in the collaborative process
• How differences of opinion were resolved
• The outcome of the collaboration
• Lessons learned about interdepartmental cooperation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What challenges did you encounter when working across departments?
• How did you ensure effective communication throughout the process?
• How were different perspectives or priorities reconciled?
• What would you do differently in future collaborative situations?

Tell me about a situation where you had to make a difficult decision regarding the validity of test results or whether to reject a specimen. What factors did you consider?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation and what made the decision difficult
• Technical factors considered in the decision-making process
• Reference to laboratory standards and protocols
• Consultation with colleagues or supervisors if applicable
• Risk assessment for patient care
• Documentation of the decision and rationale
• Communication with clinical staff if necessary
• The outcome and any feedback received

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific criteria did you use to make your decision?
• Who did you consult during this process, and why?
• How did you communicate your decision to others who needed to know?
• Looking back, do you still believe you made the right decision? Why or why not?

Describe a time when you had to train or mentor another laboratory professional. What was your approach to teaching them?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific skills or knowledge being taught
• Assessment of the trainee's starting knowledge level
• Training methods and resources used
• How the candidate structured the learning process
• Methods for providing feedback
• Assessment of competency
• Challenges encountered during the training process
• The outcome and performance of the trainee

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the trainee's learning style and adapt your approach?
• What techniques did you use to ensure they truly understood the concepts rather than just memorizing steps?
• How did you handle any mistakes or misunderstandings during the training?
• What did you learn about your own skills or knowledge through the teaching process?

Tell me about a time when you had to maintain quality standards while under significant time pressure. How did you balance speed and accuracy?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context creating time pressure
• How the candidate prioritized tasks
• Quality control measures maintained despite pressure
• Any adaptations to workflow while maintaining standards
• Communication with team members or supervisors about the situation
• Stress management techniques employed
• The outcome in terms of both timeliness and quality
• Lessons learned about efficiency

Follow-Up Questions:

• What quality control steps did you refuse to compromise despite the time pressure?
• How did you communicate expectations or limitations to others?
• What strategies helped you stay focused and accurate while working quickly?
• What would you do differently if faced with similar pressure in the future?

Describe a situation where you encountered an ethical dilemma in the laboratory. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the ethical issue without compromising confidentiality
• The competing values or obligations at stake
• Resources consulted (policies, ethics codes, colleagues)
• The decision-making process
• Actions taken to resolve the situation
• How the candidate balanced various ethical considerations
• The outcome and any follow-up
• Personal reflection on the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What values or principles guided your thinking in this situation?
• Who did you consult, if anyone, and why?
• How did you decide what the right course of action was?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to similar situations?

Tell me about a time when you had to perform a complex laboratory procedure with minimal supervision. How did you ensure you performed it correctly?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific procedure and its complexity
• Preparation steps taken before performing the procedure
• Resources used to guide the process
• Quality control measures implemented
• Problem-solving during the procedure if challenges arose
• Documentation of the procedure and results
• Verification of results
• Feedback received, if any

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare yourself before beginning the procedure?
• What resources did you have available, and which did you find most helpful?
• What quality checks did you build into your process?
• What would you do differently if you had to perform this procedure again?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when interviewing Medical Laboratory Scientists?

Behavioral questions that ask candidates to describe past experiences provide more reliable insights into their actual capabilities and approaches. When candidates describe real situations they've handled, they're drawing from genuine experiences rather than imagining ideal responses. This gives you concrete evidence of how they've applied their knowledge and skills in practice, which is particularly important in laboratory work where precision and problem-solving are critical. Research shows that past behavior is one of the best predictors of future performance.

How many behavioral questions should I ask in a Medical Laboratory Scientist interview?

It's better to ask fewer, more in-depth questions (3-5) with thorough follow-up rather than rushing through many questions superficially. This approach allows you to explore the candidate's experiences more thoroughly and assess their critical thinking and communication skills. Remember that a well-structured interview typically includes other components beyond behavioral questions, such as technical knowledge assessment and discussion of the role.

How should I evaluate a candidate who has limited professional laboratory experience?

For candidates with limited professional experience, such as recent graduates, look for experiences from academic laboratories, internships, clinical rotations, or even relevant non-laboratory situations that demonstrate transferable skills. Focus on how they approached learning, handled challenges, and applied their theoretical knowledge. Their potential for growth, learning agility, and fundamental understanding of laboratory principles can be valuable indicators of success, especially for entry-level positions.

What should I do if a candidate struggles to provide specific examples?

If a candidate has difficulty recalling specific examples, try rephrasing the question or suggesting broader contexts where they might have demonstrated the skill (e.g., "This could be from your clinical rotations, coursework, or even a volunteer experience."). You can also move to another question and return to the topic later. Some candidates may be nervous or need more time to reflect. However, consistent inability to provide concrete examples may indicate a lack of relevant experience or difficulty articulating their experiences, both potentially concerning for a role requiring clear communication and critical thinking.

How can I ensure consistency when comparing different candidates' responses to behavioral questions?

Use an interview scorecard that breaks down each competency into specific components to evaluate. Ask the same core questions to all candidates, with similar follow-up probes. Take detailed notes during each interview to support your assessments. Hold evaluation discussions only after all interviewers have independently completed their scorecards to prevent biasing each other's perspectives. This structured approach helps ensure fair comparisons across candidates with different backgrounds and communication styles.

Interested in a full interview guide for a Medical Laboratory Scientist role? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.