When it comes to evaluating Claims Adjuster candidates, behavioral interview questions are your most powerful tool for predicting on-the-job performance. Claims adjusters serve as the front-line representatives between insurance companies and policyholders during what are often stressful and emotionally charged situations. They must balance thorough investigation with empathy, all while making sound financial decisions that protect both the claimant and the company.

Insurance organizations depend on skilled claims adjusters to maintain customer satisfaction while controlling costs and ensuring compliance with regulations. The best claims adjusters combine analytical thinking with excellent communication skills, allowing them to gather accurate information, evaluate complex situations, and negotiate fair settlements. They need to demonstrate attention to detail when reviewing policies, investigating claims, and documenting findings, while also managing heavy caseloads efficiently. Additionally, they must handle difficult conversations with tact and maintain ethical standards when faced with potentially fraudulent claims.

When interviewing candidates, listen for specific examples that demonstrate their investigative abilities, decision-making process, and customer service approach. Pay special attention to how they've handled challenging claimants, complex policy interpretations, or high-pressure situations. The most effective way to evaluate these skills is through behavioral questions that prompt candidates to share detailed accounts of past experiences, allowing you to assess how they might handle similar situations at your organization.

Implementing a structured interview process with consistent questions across candidates will help you make fair comparisons and identify the best talent. For a comprehensive approach to hiring success, consider developing a detailed interview guide tailored specifically to your organization's claims adjuster role, and use an interview scorecard to objectively evaluate responses against your key competencies.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to investigate a particularly complex claim. What was your approach to gathering and analyzing information?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific challenges that made the claim complex
• Methods used to gather relevant information from multiple sources
• How the candidate organized and analyzed the evidence
• Collaboration with specialists or other departments if applicable
• How they reached their final determination
• What made their investigation approach effective

Follow-Up Questions:

• What obstacles did you encounter during your investigation, and how did you overcome them?
• How did you verify the accuracy of conflicting information?
• What resources or tools did you use to help with your analysis?
• Looking back, would you change anything about your approach to that investigation?

Describe a situation where you had to deny a claim or offer a settlement that was less than what the claimant expected. How did you handle this conversation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific circumstances of the claim
• How the candidate prepared for the difficult conversation
• The approach used to explain the decision to the claimant
• How they managed the claimant's emotional response
• Steps taken to maintain the customer relationship despite delivering bad news
• The final outcome of the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific language or techniques did you use to make the news more palatable?
• How did you ensure the claimant understood the reasons behind your decision?
• What did you learn from this experience about delivering difficult news?
• How have you applied these lessons in subsequent challenging conversations?

Tell me about a time when you identified a potentially fraudulent claim. What raised your suspicions and how did you proceed?

Areas to Cover:

• The warning signs or red flags that triggered suspicion
• The candidate's investigative process
• How they documented their findings
• Their approach to confirming or dismissing fraud concerns
• Their interactions with the claimant during this process
• The resolution of the situation and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance thoroughness with treating the claimant fairly and respectfully?
• What specific evidence or inconsistencies led to your conclusion?
• How did you handle the ethical considerations in this situation?
• What procedures or protocols did you follow when reporting your suspicions?

Share an example of a time when you had to manage multiple claims with competing deadlines. How did you prioritize your workload?

Areas to Cover:

• The number and types of claims being handled simultaneously
• The specific prioritization system or method used
• How the candidate assessed urgency and importance
• Tools or techniques used to stay organized
• How they communicated with stakeholders about timelines
• The outcome of their time management approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors did you consider when prioritizing which claims to address first?
• How did you handle unexpected urgent matters that disrupted your planned workflow?
• What systems or tools do you use to track deadlines and commitments?
• How do you balance quality and thoroughness with the need to process claims efficiently?

Describe a situation where you needed to negotiate with a claimant or their representative. What was your approach and what was the outcome?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and specifics of the negotiation situation
• How the candidate prepared for the negotiation
• Their strategy and key talking points
• How they responded to counteroffers or resistance
• The techniques used to find common ground
• The final resolution and relationship impact

Follow-Up Questions:

• What research or preparation did you do before entering the negotiation?
• What was your primary goal going into the discussion, and did it change during the process?
• How did you determine your settlement authority and parameters?
• What have you learned about effective negotiation from this experience?

Tell me about a time when you needed to interpret a complex or ambiguous policy to make a claim determination. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific policy complexities or ambiguities involved
• Resources consulted to clarify understanding
• The analytical process used to interpret the policy
• Collaboration with others (underwriters, managers, legal) if applicable
• How the candidate explained their interpretation to the claimant
• The outcome and any precedent it established

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this particular policy or provision difficult to interpret?
• How did you ensure your interpretation was consistent with company guidelines and practices?
• What resources do you typically consult when faced with unclear policy language?
• How did you explain your interpretation to the claimant in terms they could understand?

Share an example of when you had to adjust your communication style to effectively interact with a challenging claimant. What was the situation and what did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific challenge presented by the claimant's communication style or emotional state
• How the candidate recognized the need to adjust their approach
• The specific changes made to their communication style
• Active listening techniques used
• How empathy was demonstrated while maintaining professional boundaries
• The outcome of this adjusted communication approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What cues did you pick up on that indicated your initial approach wasn't working?
• How did you remain calm and professional if the claimant was upset or confrontational?
• What specific techniques have you found most effective when dealing with emotional claimants?
• How do you balance empathy with the need to gather accurate information?

Describe a time when you discovered an error in your claim assessment or settlement calculation. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the error and how it was discovered
• The candidate's immediate response upon discovering the mistake
• Steps taken to correct the error
• How they communicated about the error to stakeholders
• Preventive measures implemented to avoid similar errors
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you feel when you discovered the error, and how did you manage those emotions?
• How did you address this with your supervisor or team?
• What systems or checks have you put in place to prevent similar errors?
• How did this experience change your approach to claim assessments?

Tell me about a situation where you had to learn and apply a new regulation, technology, or process in your claims work. How did you approach this learning curve?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific new element (regulation, technology, process) that needed to be learned
• The candidate's learning strategy and resources utilized
• Challenges encountered during the learning process
• How they implemented the new knowledge in their work
• How they measured their understanding and effectiveness
• The impact on their overall performance and efficiency

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about learning this new element?
• How did you ensure you fully understood the new information before applying it?
• How did you balance the need to learn new information with your existing workload?
• What is your general approach to staying current with industry changes and new regulations?

Share an example of how you've used data or analytics to improve your claims handling process or decisions.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific data or analytics tool utilized
• How the candidate identified the opportunity to use data
• The analysis process employed
• How insights were translated into action
• The measurable improvement resulting from this data-driven approach
• How they communicated results to others

Follow-Up Questions:

• What led you to look for data-driven solutions in this instance?
• What challenges did you face in collecting or analyzing the relevant data?
• How did you validate that your data-informed changes were effective?
• What other areas of claims adjusting do you think could benefit from more data-driven approaches?

Describe a time when you had to collaborate with other departments or external experts to resolve a claim. How did you manage this collaboration?

Areas to Cover:

• The claim situation and why collaboration was necessary
• Which stakeholders were involved in the collaboration
• How the candidate initiated and structured the collaboration
• Communication methods used to coordinate efforts
• Challenges encountered during the collaborative process
• The outcome and how collaboration contributed to the resolution

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which stakeholders needed to be involved?
• What challenges did you encounter when working across departments or with external experts?
• How did you ensure everyone had the information they needed to contribute effectively?
• What did you learn about effective collaboration from this experience?

Tell me about a time when you received feedback on your claims handling process. How did you respond to this feedback?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific feedback received and from whom
• The candidate's initial reaction to the feedback
• How they evaluated the validity of the feedback
• Actions taken in response to the feedback
• Follow-up with the person who provided the feedback
• Long-term changes implemented as a result

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this feedback particularly helpful or challenging to receive?
• How do you typically distinguish between feedback that should lead to changes and feedback that may not be applicable?
• How did you measure the effectiveness of the changes you implemented?
• How do you proactively seek feedback on your performance?

Share an example of a time when you identified an opportunity to improve a claims process or procedure. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• How the candidate identified the opportunity for improvement
• The specific inefficiency or problem with the existing process
• How they developed their improvement solution
• Steps taken to propose or implement the change
• Collaboration with others on the improvement
• The measurable impact of the improvement

Follow-Up Questions:

• What prompted you to look for improvements in this particular process?
• How did you overcome any resistance to changing established procedures?
• How did you measure the success of your improvement?
• What other processes have you identified that could benefit from similar improvements?

Describe a situation where you had to make a difficult decision about a claim with limited information or time constraints. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific claim situation and constraints involved
• How the candidate assessed available information
• The decision-making process utilized
• Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
• How they communicated the decision to stakeholders
• The outcome and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What key factors influenced your decision given the limitations?
• How did you balance the need for thoroughness with the time constraints?
• What would you have done differently if you had more information or time?
• How did this experience influence your approach to similar situations in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to explain complex policy terms or legal concepts to a claimant. How did you ensure they understood?

Areas to Cover:

• The complex terms or concepts that needed explanation
• The candidate's assessment of the claimant's level of understanding
• Techniques used to simplify complex information
• Visual aids or examples employed if applicable
• How they checked for comprehension
• The outcome of the communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the claimant's level of understanding before you began your explanation?
• What specific techniques have you found most effective when explaining complex terms?
• How did you confirm the claimant truly understood rather than just nodding along?
• How has your approach to these explanations evolved over time?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when interviewing claims adjuster candidates?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually handled situations in the past, which is a strong predictor of future performance. While hypothetical questions might show a candidate's theoretical knowledge, they don't demonstrate proven abilities. When a claims adjuster describes how they've handled a difficult claimant or investigated a complex case, you gain insight into their real-world skills, decision-making process, and problem-solving approach that simply isn't available through hypothetical scenarios.

How many behavioral questions should I include in a claims adjuster interview?

Focus on 3-5 well-chosen behavioral questions rather than trying to cover too many topics superficially. Each question should be followed by thoughtful probing to understand the complete situation, the candidate's actions, and the results achieved. This approach gives you deeper insights into the candidate's capabilities and allows them to fully demonstrate their expertise. The total interview should generally include questions covering technical knowledge and cultural fit as well.

What are the most important competencies to assess when interviewing claims adjusters?

While specific priorities may vary by organization and claim types, the most critical competencies typically include analytical thinking, communication skills, negotiation abilities, attention to detail, time management, ethical judgment, and customer service orientation. Your interview scorecard should include these key competencies to ensure comprehensive evaluation.

How can I tell if a claims adjuster candidate is truly detail-oriented?

Listen for specificity in their answers. Strong candidates will provide detailed accounts of claims they've handled, including specific policy provisions, exact settlement figures, precise timelines, and nuanced descriptions of their investigations. Their storytelling should demonstrate thoroughness, and they should be able to explain the fine details that influenced their decisions. Additionally, pay attention to whether they catch subtle details in your questions and respond to all parts of multi-faceted questions.

What red flags should I watch for in candidates' responses to these behavioral questions?

Be cautious of candidates who speak in generalities rather than specific examples, blame others for negative outcomes without taking responsibility, demonstrate a lack of empathy toward claimants, show inflexibility in their approach, or reveal questionable ethical judgment. Also watch for candidates who can't articulate their decision-making process or who seem to make decisions based solely on company interests without balancing claimant needs and regulatory requirements.

Interested in a full interview guide for a Claims Adjuster role? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.