Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring a Technical Product Director

The Technical Product Director role represents a critical intersection of technical expertise, business acumen, and leadership capability. This pivotal position requires individuals who can not only understand complex technical concepts but also translate them into viable product strategies that drive business growth. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in these multifaceted areas.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates actually approach the challenges they'll face in the role. For Technical Product Directors, these exercises should simulate real-world scenarios that test their ability to develop product strategies, make technical decisions, collaborate across departments, and communicate effectively with various stakeholders.

By implementing structured work samples, you gain insight into how candidates think on their feet, prioritize competing demands, and balance technical considerations with business objectives. These exercises reveal skills that might otherwise remain hidden in a traditional interview format, such as how candidates handle ambiguity, incorporate feedback, and adapt their approach when faced with new information.

The following four work samples are specifically designed to evaluate the core competencies required for a successful Technical Product Director. Each exercise targets different aspects of the role, from strategic planning to cross-functional collaboration, providing a comprehensive assessment of a candidate's capabilities. When used as part of a structured interview process, these exercises will significantly improve your ability to identify candidates who will excel in this critical leadership position.

Activity #1: Product Roadmap Prioritization Exercise

This exercise evaluates a candidate's strategic thinking, prioritization skills, and ability to align product development with business objectives. Technical Product Directors must constantly balance competing priorities, technical constraints, and business goals when developing product roadmaps. This simulation reveals how candidates approach these complex decisions and communicate their rationale to stakeholders.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a fictional product scenario with 10-15 potential features or enhancements that could be added to a product roadmap.
• Include a mix of customer requests, technical debt items, competitive responses, and innovative features.
• For each item, provide a brief description, estimated development effort (in story points or time), potential business impact (high/medium/low), and any dependencies.
• Create a one-page document outlining the company's strategic objectives for the next 12 months.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise, including preparation, presentation, and feedback.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided product backlog items and company strategic objectives.
• Create a prioritized roadmap for the next three quarters, selecting which items to include and which to defer.
• Prepare a brief presentation (10-15 minutes) explaining your roadmap decisions, including:
• Your prioritization methodology
• How your roadmap aligns with strategic objectives
• Key milestones and expected outcomes
• Risks and contingency plans
• Be prepared to answer questions about your decision-making process and defend your choices.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on the candidate's prioritization approach and strategic alignment.
• Ask the candidate to reconsider one aspect of their roadmap based on new information (e.g., "We just learned a competitor is launching a similar feature next month").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to adjust their roadmap and explain how they would communicate this change to the team.

Activity #2: Technical Decision-Making Simulation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to navigate complex technical decisions while balancing business needs. Technical Product Directors must understand technical concepts deeply enough to make informed decisions and effectively communicate with engineering teams. This simulation reveals how candidates approach technical challenges and make decisions with incomplete information.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a significant technical challenge or architectural decision facing the product team.
• Examples include: choosing between a microservices vs. monolithic architecture, deciding whether to build or buy a key component, or selecting a technology stack for a new product.
• Provide relevant context including current architecture, business constraints (time, budget), and key requirements.
• Include 2-3 potential approaches, each with pros and cons, but leave room for the candidate to suggest alternatives.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the technical challenge scenario and supporting information.
• Prepare a recommendation for how to address the challenge, including:
• Your recommended approach and rationale
• Key considerations that influenced your decision
• Potential risks and mitigation strategies
• Implementation considerations and timeline
• Success metrics for evaluating the decision
• Be prepared to explain your recommendation to both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
• Consider how you would collaborate with engineering leaders to implement your recommendation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their recommendation, provide feedback on their technical understanding and decision-making process.
• Introduce a new constraint or requirement that challenges their recommendation (e.g., "The engineering team just informed us that approach would take 3 months longer than expected").
• Ask the candidate to reconsider their recommendation in light of this new information and explain how they would adapt their approach.

Activity #3: Cross-Functional Collaboration Role Play

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to navigate cross-functional dynamics and build consensus among stakeholders with different priorities. Technical Product Directors must excel at collaboration and communication across departments. This role play reveals how candidates handle conflicting priorities and build alignment among diverse stakeholders.

Directions for the Company:

• Design a scenario where a product decision has created tension between different departments.
• Example: A critical feature has technical issues that will delay launch, but sales has already promised it to key customers.
• Assign 3-4 interviewers to play different stakeholders (Engineering Lead, Sales Director, Marketing Manager, etc.).
• Provide each role player with specific concerns, priorities, and personality traits to simulate realistic cross-functional dynamics.
• Brief the role players on how to respond to different approaches from the candidate.
• Allocate 30-45 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• You will participate in a simulated cross-functional meeting to address a product challenge.
• Review the scenario information provided 24 hours before the interview.
• Your goal is to facilitate the meeting, understand each stakeholder's perspective, and work toward a resolution that balances competing priorities.
• Prepare to:
• Set the agenda and structure for the meeting
• Facilitate discussion among stakeholders
• Identify areas of agreement and disagreement
• Propose solutions that address key concerns
• Build consensus around next steps
• Focus on both the content of the discussion and the process of collaboration.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the role play, provide feedback on the candidate's facilitation skills, stakeholder management, and problem-solving approach.
• Highlight one aspect of their facilitation that could be improved (e.g., "You might have spent more time understanding the engineering constraints before proposing solutions").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to reflect on how they would approach a similar situation differently based on this feedback.

Activity #4: Market Analysis and Product Opportunity Assessment

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to identify market opportunities and translate them into viable product concepts. Technical Product Directors must excel at market research, competitive analysis, and innovative thinking. This exercise reveals how candidates approach market analysis and connect customer needs to product solutions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a brief on a market segment relevant to your company's products.
• Include information on target customers, key competitors, market trends, and technological developments.
• Optionally, provide anonymized customer feedback or user research data.
• Consider providing this information 24-48 hours before the interview to allow for thoughtful analysis.
• Allocate 60-75 minutes for this exercise, including preparation, presentation, and feedback.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the market information provided.
• Identify 2-3 potential product opportunities based on your analysis of customer needs, market gaps, and competitive landscape.
• For each opportunity, prepare:
• A clear value proposition
• Target customer segments
• Key features and capabilities
• Competitive differentiation
• High-level implementation considerations
• Success metrics
• Prepare a 15-20 minute presentation of your analysis and recommendations.
• Be prepared to explain your methodology and defend your conclusions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on the candidate's market analysis, opportunity identification, and product thinking.
• Challenge one of their assumptions or conclusions with additional information (e.g., "Our research shows that customers in this segment are actually more price-sensitive than feature-driven").
• Ask the candidate to reconsider their recommendation based on this feedback and explain how it would change their approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise requires 45-75 minutes to complete properly, including time for setup, execution, feedback, and the candidate's response to feedback. We recommend conducting no more than two exercises in a single day to avoid candidate fatigue. The Market Analysis exercise benefits from providing materials 24-48 hours in advance to allow for thoughtful preparation.

Should we use these exercises for all Technical Product Director candidates?

Yes, using consistent exercises across candidates enables fair comparison. However, you may need to adjust the specific scenarios to match the technical domain or product area relevant to the role. The core structure and evaluation criteria should remain consistent.

How should we evaluate candidates' performance on these exercises?

Create a structured scorecard for each exercise that aligns with the key competencies in your job description. Rate candidates on specific dimensions (e.g., strategic thinking, technical understanding, communication) rather than giving a single overall score. Have multiple interviewers evaluate the same dimensions independently before discussing their assessments.

What if a candidate has limited experience in our specific industry or technical domain?

These exercises are designed to evaluate transferable skills rather than domain-specific knowledge. Strong candidates should be able to ask clarifying questions and apply their product leadership skills to unfamiliar contexts. Consider providing additional context or background information for candidates coming from different industries.

How do we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from underrepresented groups?

Review exercise materials to eliminate industry jargon or cultural references that might disadvantage certain candidates. Provide clear instructions and evaluation criteria focused on job-relevant skills. Consider offering all candidates the option to receive materials in advance to reduce the impact of interview anxiety on performance.

Can we combine these exercises with other interview formats?

Absolutely. These work samples should complement behavioral interviews and technical discussions. For a comprehensive assessment, combine these exercises with structured behavioral interviews focused on past experiences and achievements in similar situations.

The Technical Product Director role is pivotal to your organization's success in delivering innovative, market-aligned products. By implementing these work sample exercises as part of your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' actual capabilities and significantly improve your hiring decisions.

For more support in creating effective hiring processes, check out Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. These tools can help you streamline your hiring process while maintaining the highest standards of quality and consistency. Learn more about the Technical Product Director role in our comprehensive job description guide.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for this role? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!