Effective Work Samples for Evaluating Enterprise LLM Integration Skills

Enterprise LLM integration represents one of the most transformative technological shifts for organizations today. Companies seeking to implement large language models across their operations need professionals who can bridge the gap between cutting-edge AI capabilities and practical business applications. The complexity of enterprise LLM integration demands a unique blend of technical expertise, strategic thinking, and business acumen.

Evaluating candidates for LLM integration roles presents significant challenges. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in planning and executing complex AI implementations. Technical knowledge alone isn't sufficient—successful integration specialists must understand enterprise architecture, security requirements, compliance considerations, and how to align AI capabilities with business objectives.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world LLM integration challenges. By observing candidates tackle authentic scenarios, hiring teams can assess their problem-solving methodology, technical depth, communication skills, and ability to navigate the unique complexities of enterprise environments. These exercises reveal not just what candidates know, but how they apply that knowledge.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate candidates across the critical dimensions of enterprise LLM integration: strategic planning, technical implementation, risk management, and business value creation. Each exercise simulates challenges that integration specialists commonly face, providing a comprehensive view of a candidate's readiness for the role.

Activity #1: Enterprise LLM Integration Roadmap

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop a strategic implementation plan for integrating LLMs across an enterprise. It tests their understanding of organizational readiness, technical infrastructure requirements, and ability to create a phased approach that balances quick wins with long-term transformation.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a fictional enterprise case study that includes:
• Company background (industry, size, current technology stack)
• Business objectives for LLM integration
• Current data infrastructure and AI maturity level
• Key stakeholders and their priorities
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to develop their roadmap
• Provide access to a whiteboard (physical or digital) for the candidate to sketch their plan
• Have a technical leader and business stakeholder present to evaluate the roadmap

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the case study materials and develop a 12-month roadmap for LLM integration
• Your roadmap should include:
• Assessment of current capabilities and gaps
• Recommended LLM platforms/models and why they're appropriate
• Infrastructure requirements and changes needed
• Phased implementation approach with specific milestones
• Key dependencies and potential bottlenecks
• Success metrics for each phase
• Present your roadmap in a 15-minute briefing, followed by 10 minutes of Q&A

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one strategic element the candidate handled well and one area where their approach could be improved
• Ask the candidate to revise their phasing strategy or success metrics based on the feedback
• Give them 10 minutes to make adjustments and explain their revised approach

Activity #2: LLM API Integration and Prompt Engineering

This exercise assesses a candidate's hands-on technical skills in working with LLM APIs and developing effective prompts for enterprise use cases. It evaluates their ability to translate business requirements into technical implementations and optimize LLM performance for specific applications.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified enterprise use case (e.g., customer support automation, document analysis, or knowledge management)
• Provide access to a development environment with LLM API access (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, or an open-source model)
• Include sample data relevant to the use case (anonymized if needed)
• Prepare evaluation criteria focused on code quality, prompt effectiveness, and handling of edge cases
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the enterprise use case and requirements
• Develop a working prototype that:
• Connects to the provided LLM API
• Implements appropriate prompt engineering techniques
• Handles the core functionality described in the use case
• Includes basic error handling and edge cases
• Document your approach, including:
• Key design decisions and why you made them
• Prompt engineering strategies employed
• Limitations of your solution and how you'd address them in production
• Be prepared to walk through your code and explain your implementation choices

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one technical aspect the candidate implemented effectively and one area where their implementation could be improved
• Ask the candidate to refine their prompt engineering approach based on the feedback
• Allow 15 minutes for the candidate to make adjustments and explain how their changes improve the solution

Activity #3: LLM Integration Risk Assessment

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with enterprise LLM integration. It tests their understanding of security, compliance, ethical considerations, and operational challenges specific to large language models in enterprise environments.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed scenario for LLM implementation in a regulated industry (e.g., healthcare, finance, or government)
• Include specific compliance requirements, data sensitivity considerations, and business continuity needs
• Provide a template for risk assessment that includes categories such as:
• Security risks
• Compliance/regulatory risks
• Ethical/bias risks
• Operational risks
• Data privacy risks
• Allow 45-60 minutes for completion

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the enterprise scenario and identify at least 3-4 significant risks in each category
• For each identified risk:
• Assess its potential impact and likelihood
• Propose specific mitigation strategies
• Identify key stakeholders who should be involved
• Suggest monitoring approaches to detect if the risk materializes
• Prioritize the risks based on their potential impact to the organization
• Develop a one-page executive summary of your top 5 risks and mitigation strategies
• Be prepared to present your assessment and answer questions about your approach

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one risk category the candidate assessed thoroughly and one area where their analysis could be more comprehensive
• Ask the candidate to develop a more detailed mitigation plan for the area identified for improvement
• Allow 15 minutes for the candidate to enhance their risk mitigation approach and explain their reasoning

Activity #4: LLM Integration Business Case Development

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to articulate the business value of LLM integration and develop a compelling case for investment. It tests their understanding of cost structures, ROI calculation, and ability to align technical capabilities with business outcomes.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a scenario with:
• Description of a specific enterprise use case for LLM integration
• Current process metrics (e.g., time, cost, error rates)
• Available budget constraints
• Organizational priorities and strategic objectives
• Include templates for ROI calculation and business case presentation
• Make available industry benchmarks or case studies for reference
• Allow 60 minutes for preparation

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a business case for the LLM integration initiative that includes:
• Executive summary of the proposed solution
• Quantified benefits (both tangible and intangible)
• Implementation costs (technology, resources, training)
• ROI calculation with payback period
• Implementation timeline with key milestones
• Success metrics and measurement approach
• Key risks and mitigation strategies
• Create a 5-slide presentation summarizing your business case
• Be prepared to present your business case in 10 minutes and defend your assumptions

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the business case that was particularly compelling and one area where the value proposition could be strengthened
• Ask the candidate to refine their ROI calculation or success metrics based on the feedback
• Allow 15 minutes for the candidate to enhance their business case and explain how their revisions strengthen the argument for investment

Frequently Asked Questions

How should we adapt these exercises for candidates with different experience levels?

For junior candidates, provide more structure and guidance in the exercises. You might simplify the enterprise scenario or provide more detailed templates. For senior candidates, increase complexity by adding constraints like budget limitations or competing priorities that require strategic tradeoffs.

What if we don't have access to LLM APIs for the technical implementation exercise?

You can modify the exercise to focus on pseudocode and architecture design rather than actual implementation. Alternatively, use publicly available APIs with free tiers (like OpenAI's) or open-source models that can be run locally with minimal setup.

How do we evaluate candidates who take different approaches to these exercises?

Focus on the reasoning behind their decisions rather than expecting a specific "correct" answer. The best candidates will clearly articulate why they made certain choices and demonstrate awareness of alternatives. Create a rubric that evaluates process, communication, and technical soundness rather than adherence to a particular solution.

Should we provide these exercises as take-home assignments or conduct them in person?

Both approaches have merit. Take-home assignments allow candidates more time for thoughtful work but may disadvantage those with limited free time. In-person exercises better simulate workplace pressure but may induce anxiety. Consider offering options or using a hybrid approach—for example, providing the scenario in advance but having candidates present or extend their work during the interview.

How can we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from non-enterprise backgrounds?

Provide sufficient context about enterprise environments in your materials. Focus evaluation on transferable skills like systematic thinking, attention to detail, and ability to balance competing priorities rather than specific enterprise terminology or processes. Be open to innovative approaches that might come from different backgrounds.

What if a candidate struggles with the feedback portion of the exercise?

This itself provides valuable information about the candidate's adaptability and response to coaching. If a candidate struggles, try offering more specific guidance and see how they respond. The ability to incorporate feedback effectively is often more important than getting everything right the first time.

Enterprise LLM integration represents a significant opportunity for organizations to transform their operations and create competitive advantage. By using these work samples in your hiring process, you can identify candidates who not only understand the technical aspects of LLM integration but can also navigate the complex business, ethical, and operational considerations unique to enterprise environments.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for LLM Integration Planning? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!