Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Product Roadmap Communication Skills

Communicating AI product roadmaps effectively is a critical skill in today's technology landscape. As organizations increasingly integrate artificial intelligence into their products and services, the ability to clearly articulate complex AI capabilities, development timelines, and strategic vision becomes essential for product success. The challenge lies in translating technical AI concepts into compelling narratives that resonate with diverse stakeholders, from technical teams to executives and customers.

Evaluating a candidate's ability to communicate AI product roadmaps requires more than standard interview questions. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal how candidates actually perform in realistic scenarios that demand both technical understanding and communication finesse. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach the unique challenges of explaining AI capabilities, managing expectations around emerging technologies, and aligning stakeholders around a cohesive vision.

The complexity of AI products creates specific communication challenges. Candidates must demonstrate they can explain technical concepts without oversimplification, manage expectations around AI capabilities without overpromising, and create excitement without veering into hype. They must also show they can tailor messages for different audiences while maintaining consistency in the overall product narrative.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to communicate AI product roadmaps effectively across different contexts and stakeholders. Each exercise simulates real-world scenarios that product managers, product marketers, or technical leaders might encounter when communicating about AI-powered products. By observing candidates complete these exercises, you'll gain valuable insights into their communication skills, technical understanding, strategic thinking, and ability to translate complex AI concepts into clear, compelling narratives.

Activity #1: Executive Briefing on AI Roadmap

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to communicate complex AI product roadmap information to senior executives. It tests their skill in distilling technical details into strategic business value, managing expectations around AI capabilities, and aligning the roadmap with business objectives. This exercise reveals how candidates prioritize information for time-constrained executives while still conveying the essential technical and strategic elements of an AI product roadmap.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a detailed AI product roadmap document (3-5 pages) that includes technical specifications, development timelines, feature dependencies, and technical challenges for an AI-powered product.
• Include information about the company's business strategy and objectives in the document.
• Ask the candidate to prepare a 10-minute executive briefing presentation on the AI product roadmap.
• Schedule a 20-minute session: 10 minutes for the presentation and 10 minutes for Q&A and feedback.
• Have 2-3 interviewers role-play as executives with different backgrounds (e.g., CEO, CTO, CMO).
• Prepare challenging questions that executives might ask about AI capabilities, timelines, and business impact.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI product roadmap document and prepare a 10-minute executive briefing presentation.
• Focus on communicating the strategic value of the AI features, key milestones, resource requirements, and expected business outcomes.
• Be prepared to explain technical AI concepts in business terms without oversimplifying.
• Create 5-7 slides to support your presentation (you may use PowerPoint, Google Slides, or similar tools).
• Be ready to answer questions about technical feasibility, competitive differentiation, and business impact.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one aspect the candidate communicated effectively (e.g., "You did an excellent job explaining how the sentiment analysis feature translates to customer retention benefits").
• Provide one piece of constructive feedback on an area for improvement (e.g., "Your explanation of the machine learning model training timeline could be clearer for non-technical executives").
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to revise and re-present the section related to the improvement feedback.

Activity #2: Cross-Functional AI Feature Communication

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to communicate specific AI features to cross-functional teams with varying technical backgrounds. It tests their skill in tailoring messages about the same AI capability to different audiences while maintaining consistency. This exercise reveals how candidates adapt their communication style and depth of technical detail based on audience needs while ensuring all teams understand their role in delivering the AI feature.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a one-page description of a specific AI feature (e.g., a recommendation engine, natural language processing capability, or computer vision feature).
• Include technical specifications, development challenges, and business objectives for the feature.
• Ask the candidate to prepare three different communication artifacts for three different teams: engineering, marketing, and customer support.
• Provide 45 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation and feedback.
• Have interviewers represent members from each team who will evaluate the relevance of the communication for their function.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI feature description and prepare three different communication artifacts:

1. A technical specification summary for the engineering team (1 page)
2. A feature positioning document for the marketing team (1 page)
3. A customer-facing FAQ for the customer support team (5-7 questions and answers)

• Each document should communicate the same AI feature but tailored to the specific needs and technical understanding of each team.
• Focus on what each team needs to know to perform their function effectively.
• Be prepared to explain your rationale for what information you included and excluded for each audience.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one communication artifact that effectively addressed the needs of its intended audience.
• Offer constructive feedback on one artifact that could better serve its audience's needs.
• Ask the candidate to revise the artifact that needs improvement, giving them 10 minutes to make adjustments.
• Discuss the changes they made and why they believe the revised version better meets the audience's needs.

Activity #3: AI Capability Expectation Management

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to manage expectations around AI capabilities and timelines. It tests their skill in communicating honestly about AI limitations while maintaining enthusiasm for the product vision. This exercise reveals how candidates handle the tension between ambitious AI goals and realistic delivery timelines, and how they communicate uncertainty inherent in AI development.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where an AI feature is facing technical challenges or limitations (e.g., lower accuracy than initially projected, longer training times, unexpected edge cases).
• Provide a brief on the original promises made to stakeholders and the current reality of the AI capability.
• Ask the candidate to prepare a communication plan to address the gap between expectations and reality.
• Schedule a 30-minute session: 15 minutes for presentation and 15 minutes for discussion and feedback.
• Have interviewers role-play as concerned stakeholders (e.g., sales leader, product leader, key customer).

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and develop a communication plan that:

1. Honestly addresses the current limitations or challenges with the AI feature
2. Reframes expectations without undermining confidence in the product
3. Provides a revised timeline or alternative approach
4. Maintains trust with stakeholders

• Prepare a brief presentation (5-7 minutes) explaining your communication approach.
• Create at least one communication artifact (e.g., email, slide deck, or talking points) to support your plan.
• Be prepared to role-play a difficult conversation with a stakeholder who is disappointed by the news.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the candidate's expectation management approach that was particularly effective.
• Offer constructive feedback on one aspect that could be improved (e.g., "Your timeline might still be too optimistic given the technical challenges described").
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach based on the feedback and role-play a brief follow-up conversation with the most challenging stakeholder.
• Evaluate how well they incorporated the feedback and adapted their communication.

Activity #4: AI Roadmap Visualization and Narrative

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to create compelling visual representations of AI product roadmaps that tell a coherent story. It tests their skill in organizing complex information into accessible formats and crafting narratives that connect AI capabilities to user and business value. This exercise reveals how candidates think about information architecture and visual communication to make AI roadmaps understandable and engaging.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with raw information about an AI product roadmap, including features, dependencies, timelines, and strategic objectives.
• Present this information in an unstructured format (e.g., bullet points, spreadsheet data, or notes from stakeholder interviews).
• Ask the candidate to create a visual roadmap representation and accompanying narrative that tells a compelling story about the AI product evolution.
• Allow 60 minutes for preparation and 20 minutes for presentation and feedback.
• Provide access to basic tools (PowerPoint, Google Slides, or even paper and markers).

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the unstructured roadmap information and organize it into a coherent visual representation.
• Create a visual roadmap that clearly communicates:

1. The evolution of AI capabilities over time
2. Key milestones and dependencies
3. The progression of user value and business impact
4. The relationship between technical development and market-facing features

• Develop a narrative (2-3 paragraphs) that tells the story of this AI product evolution in compelling terms.
• Be prepared to explain your choices in information organization, visualization approach, and narrative framing.
• Consider how this visualization and narrative would be received by different stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the visualization or narrative that effectively communicated the AI roadmap.
• Offer constructive feedback on one aspect that could be improved for clarity or impact.
• Ask the candidate to revise a specific portion of their visualization or narrative based on the feedback.
• Discuss how the revised version improves understanding of the AI roadmap and better serves stakeholder needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

How technical should candidates be expected to get when discussing AI capabilities?

Candidates should demonstrate enough technical understanding to communicate accurately about AI capabilities and limitations without misrepresenting what's possible. They should be able to translate technical concepts for non-technical audiences without oversimplification. The ideal candidate can adjust their technical depth based on the audience while maintaining accuracy.

Should we provide real product information or create fictional scenarios?

For confidentiality reasons, it's best to create fictional but realistic AI product scenarios. However, these should closely mirror the complexity and challenges of your actual products. If possible, adapt anonymized versions of real situations your team has faced to make the exercises authentic while protecting proprietary information.

How do we evaluate candidates who have strong technical AI knowledge but less communication experience?

Focus on their ability to translate their technical knowledge into terms relevant to different audiences. Look for willingness to adapt their communication style and receptiveness to feedback. Technical experts can develop communication skills if they demonstrate awareness of audience needs and flexibility in their approach.

What if our interviewers don't have deep AI knowledge themselves?

Prepare your interviewers with key questions that reveal whether candidates are communicating accurately about AI. Focus evaluation on clarity, audience-appropriateness, and how well the candidate manages expectations around AI capabilities. You can also include one technical team member in the interview panel to assess technical accuracy.

How much time should we allocate for these exercises in our interview process?

These exercises work best when candidates have adequate preparation time. Consider sending the initial materials 24-48 hours before the interview for Activities #1 and #4. For Activities #2 and #3, allow 30-60 minutes of preparation time during the interview. The total interview time including preparation, presentation, and feedback should be 60-90 minutes.

Can these exercises be adapted for remote interviews?

Yes, all these exercises can be conducted remotely. Provide materials via email or shared documents before the interview. Use video conferencing with screen sharing for presentations. For collaborative activities, utilize digital whiteboarding tools or shared documents. Ensure candidates have clear instructions about the technology they'll need to use.

Effective communication of AI product roadmaps requires a unique blend of technical understanding, strategic thinking, and communication skills. By using these work samples, you can evaluate candidates' ability to translate complex AI concepts into compelling narratives that resonate with different stakeholders. The best candidates will demonstrate not just technical knowledge, but the ability to manage expectations, tailor messages to different audiences, and create clear visualizations that tell a coherent story about your AI product evolution.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. These tools can help you create comprehensive interview processes that identify the best talent for your AI product teams.

Build a complete interview guide for evaluating AI product roadmap communication skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account