Effective Work Samples for Evaluating AI Exit Interview Analysis Skills

Exit interviews provide invaluable insights into why employees leave an organization, offering a goldmine of data that can help improve retention, culture, and overall organizational health. However, manually analyzing hundreds or thousands of exit interviews is time-consuming and often results in missed patterns and insights. This is where AI-powered exit interview analysis becomes transformative, allowing organizations to systematically identify trends, uncover hidden issues, and generate actionable recommendations at scale.

Professionals skilled in AI exit interview analysis combine expertise in natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and organizational psychology to transform unstructured interview data into strategic intelligence. These specialists must not only understand the technical aspects of AI implementation but also possess the business acumen to translate findings into meaningful organizational improvements. Finding candidates with this unique blend of skills requires thoughtful evaluation beyond traditional interviews.

Work samples provide a realistic preview of how candidates approach AI-driven exit interview analysis. By observing candidates as they clean data, identify patterns, generate insights, and communicate findings, hiring managers can assess both technical proficiency and business understanding. These exercises reveal how candidates think about data privacy, handle ambiguity, and connect employee feedback to organizational strategy.

The following four activities are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to work with AI in exit interview analysis across the entire workflow—from data preparation to insight communication. Each exercise simulates real-world challenges faced by professionals in this field and provides opportunities to demonstrate critical thinking, technical skills, and business acumen.

Activity #1: Exit Interview Data Preparation for AI Analysis

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to prepare messy, unstructured exit interview data for AI analysis. Proper data preparation is the foundation of effective AI analysis, requiring an understanding of both the technical requirements of AI systems and the contextual nuances of exit interview content. This exercise reveals how candidates approach data cleaning, normalization, and structuring while maintaining the integrity of employee feedback.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a sample dataset of 15-20 anonymized exit interview transcripts or notes in various formats (some structured, some unstructured).
• Include common data issues: inconsistent formatting, missing fields, abbreviations, typos, and mixed qualitative/quantitative responses.
• Allow candidates to use their preferred tools (Excel, Python, R, etc.) to prepare the data.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Provide access to a computer with necessary software or allow candidates to use their own devices.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided exit interview dataset and identify key data quality issues that would impact AI analysis.
• Clean and structure the data to make it suitable for AI-based text analysis and pattern recognition.
• Create a standardized format that preserves the nuance of responses while enabling systematic analysis.
• Document your approach, including decisions made about data transformation, categorization, and handling of ambiguous responses.
• Prepare a brief explanation of how your data preparation choices will impact downstream AI analysis.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After completion, the interviewer should provide feedback on one strength (e.g., thoroughness of data cleaning, creative approach to standardization) and one area for improvement (e.g., overlooking certain patterns, excessive simplification of responses).
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback and explain how they would incorporate this feedback if starting over.
• Evaluate their receptiveness to feedback and ability to adapt their approach.

Activity #2: AI-Driven Pattern Recognition in Exit Interviews

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to use AI tools to identify meaningful patterns in exit interview data. Beyond technical implementation, this activity reveals how candidates think about pattern significance, distinguish between correlation and causation, and balance quantitative findings with qualitative context. It demonstrates their ability to leverage AI while maintaining critical human oversight.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a cleaned dataset of 50-100 anonymized exit interviews with various reasons for departure.
• Include subtle patterns that aren't immediately obvious (e.g., departures clustered by manager, tenure-based patterns, compensation issues masked as "career growth").
• Provide access to basic AI analysis tools (could be as simple as Excel with Power Query, or more advanced tools like Python with NLP libraries if appropriate for the role).
• Create a scenario brief describing the organization's current retention concerns.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Using the provided tools, analyze the exit interview dataset to identify significant patterns and trends.
• Apply appropriate AI techniques (e.g., topic modeling, sentiment analysis, clustering) to uncover non-obvious insights.
• Distinguish between statistically significant patterns and potential coincidences.
• Identify at least three key patterns in the data and explain their potential organizational implications.
• Document your analytical approach, including which AI techniques you applied and why.
• Prepare a brief summary of findings that highlights the most important patterns discovered.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on one strength (e.g., innovative analytical approach, identification of subtle patterns) and one area for improvement (e.g., overreliance on quantitative data, missing contextual factors).
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to revisit one pattern they identified, applying the feedback to deepen their analysis.
• Assess their ability to integrate feedback and enhance their analytical approach.

Activity #3: Generating Actionable Insights from AI-Analyzed Exit Data

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to transform AI-generated patterns into meaningful business insights and recommendations. It tests their capacity to bridge technical analysis and practical business application—a critical skill for professionals in this field. The exercise reveals how candidates prioritize findings, connect exit data to broader organizational challenges, and develop actionable recommendations.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a summary of AI-analyzed exit interview data that includes multiple patterns and trends.
• Include a mix of obvious issues (e.g., compensation concerns) and more nuanced findings (e.g., subtle leadership problems, career path limitations).
• Supply basic company context: industry, size, growth trajectory, and current strategic priorities.
• Include some potentially contradictory findings to test the candidate's critical thinking.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI-analyzed exit interview data and company context provided.
• Identify the 3-5 most significant insights from the data, considering both frequency and potential organizational impact.
• For each insight, develop specific, actionable recommendations that address root causes rather than symptoms.
• Prioritize your recommendations based on potential impact, feasibility, and alignment with company priorities.
• Create a brief implementation roadmap for your top recommendation, including key stakeholders, potential challenges, and success metrics.
• Prepare to explain how you distinguished between symptoms and root causes in your analysis.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on one strength (e.g., insightful connection between data and business context, practical recommendations) and one area for improvement (e.g., overlooking implementation challenges, insufficient prioritization).
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to revise their top recommendation based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback while maintaining the integrity of their analysis.

Activity #4: Communicating AI-Generated Exit Interview Insights to Leadership

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to effectively communicate complex AI-derived insights to non-technical stakeholders. It tests their skill in translating technical findings into business language, anticipating executive questions, and framing insights in ways that drive action. This activity reveals how candidates balance analytical depth with communication clarity—a crucial skill for ensuring AI-generated insights lead to organizational change.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where the candidate must present AI-generated exit interview insights to an executive team.
• Provide a set of AI-generated insights, including visualizations, trend data, and key findings from exit interviews.
• Include some potentially sensitive findings (e.g., leadership issues, compensation inequities) to test communication judgment.
• Assign 1-2 company representatives to play the role of executives during the presentation.
• Allow 30 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation and Q&A.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI-generated exit interview insights provided.
• Prepare a 10-minute executive presentation that communicates the most important findings and recommendations.
• Create or adapt 2-3 visualizations that effectively communicate key patterns to non-technical stakeholders.
• Structure your presentation to address likely executive concerns: business impact, implementation feasibility, and ROI.
• Be prepared to answer challenging questions about your methodology, findings, and recommendations.
• Focus on translating technical AI concepts into business language without losing analytical rigor.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, the interviewer should provide feedback on one strength (e.g., clear communication of complex findings, effective handling of questions) and one area for improvement (e.g., too much technical detail, insufficient business context).
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to revise and re-deliver a specific portion of their presentation based on the feedback.
• Assess their ability to adapt their communication style while maintaining the integrity of the insights.

Frequently Asked Questions

How technical should candidates be to complete these exercises?

Candidates should have working knowledge of AI concepts and applications in text analysis, but don't need to be data scientists or AI engineers. The focus is on their ability to work with AI tools, interpret results, and translate findings into business value. Adjust the technical requirements based on the specific role—more technical for AI specialists, less technical for HR analytics roles.

Should we provide real company exit data for these exercises?

No, always use anonymized and synthesized data that resembles your actual exit interviews but doesn't contain real employee information. This protects confidentiality while still creating realistic scenarios. You can base synthetic data on actual patterns you've observed, just ensure all identifying information is removed.

How do we evaluate candidates who use different approaches or tools than we expected?

Focus on the effectiveness of their solution rather than specific tools or techniques. The key is whether they can prepare data appropriately, identify meaningful patterns, generate valuable insights, and communicate effectively. Different approaches often reveal unique strengths and creative problem-solving abilities.

What if a candidate identifies issues in our exercise data that we didn't intend?

This is actually valuable information! Strong candidates often spot patterns or problems that weren't deliberately included. Evaluate their reasoning and the validity of their findings. Their ability to see what others missed might indicate exceptional analytical skills, even if it wasn't part of your planned assessment.

How should we weight technical skills versus business acumen in evaluating these exercises?

The ideal balance depends on your specific needs, but generally, look for candidates who demonstrate both technical competence and business understanding. The most effective professionals in this field can bridge these domains—technically sound enough to work with AI systems but business-savvy enough to generate meaningful organizational insights.

Can these exercises be adapted for remote hiring processes?

Absolutely. All four activities can be conducted virtually using video conferencing, shared documents, and collaborative tools. For remote assessments, consider providing more structured templates and clearer instructions, and allow slightly more time to account for potential technology challenges.

AI-powered exit interview analysis represents a significant opportunity for organizations to transform departing employee feedback into strategic intelligence. By using these work samples to evaluate candidates, you can identify professionals who combine technical AI knowledge with business acumen and communication skills—the precise blend needed to generate actionable insights from exit data.

Yardstick's suite of hiring tools can help you further refine your approach to evaluating these specialized skills. Our AI Job Descriptions ensure you're attracting the right candidates, while our AI Interview Question Generator and AI Interview Guide Generator complement these work samples with targeted questions to thoroughly assess each candidate's capabilities.

Build a complete interview guide for AI exit interview analysis skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account: Get Started Today