Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Security Architects

In today's rapidly evolving threat landscape, hiring the right Security Architect is more critical than ever. These professionals serve as the cornerstone of an organization's cybersecurity strategy, designing and implementing the frameworks that protect critical systems and sensitive data from increasingly sophisticated attacks. A poor hiring decision in this role can leave your organization vulnerable to breaches that damage reputation, compromise customer trust, and potentially result in significant financial losses.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in designing robust security architectures, analyzing complex vulnerabilities, and communicating technical concepts to diverse stakeholders. Resume credentials and certifications, while valuable indicators, don't necessarily demonstrate how a candidate approaches real-world security challenges or collaborates with cross-functional teams to implement solutions.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually think and perform when faced with scenarios similar to those they'll encounter on the job. For Security Architects, these exercises can reveal critical thinking patterns, technical depth, communication skills, and the ability to balance security requirements with business needs—all essential qualities that might not emerge in a standard interview.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate candidates across the key competencies required for success as a Security Architect: strategic thinking, technical expertise, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and significantly improve your chances of identifying the security leader your organization needs.

Activity #1: Vulnerability Assessment and Remediation Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify security vulnerabilities in an existing system architecture and develop a prioritized remediation plan. Security Architects must excel at spotting weaknesses in complex systems and recommending practical, risk-based solutions that align with business objectives.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified network and application architecture diagram of a fictional company system (e.g., an e-commerce platform, healthcare system, or financial services application).
• Include deliberate security vulnerabilities in the architecture, such as missing network segmentation, inadequate encryption, weak authentication mechanisms, or insecure API implementations.
• Provide context about the fictional organization, including its industry, size, regulatory requirements, and business priorities.
• Allow candidates 45-60 minutes to review the materials and prepare their assessment.
• Consider creating a standardized scoring rubric that evaluates the comprehensiveness of vulnerability identification, prioritization logic, and practicality of remediation recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided system architecture diagram and organizational context.
• Identify at least 5-7 significant security vulnerabilities or architectural weaknesses.
• Create a prioritized remediation plan that addresses these vulnerabilities, explaining your prioritization criteria.
• Prepare a brief (10-minute) presentation of your findings and recommendations for senior leadership, balancing technical details with business impact.
• Be prepared to explain how your recommendations align with relevant security frameworks (e.g., NIST, ISO, OWASP) and regulatory requirements.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate's presentation, provide specific feedback on one vulnerability they identified well and their corresponding remediation approach.
• Offer constructive feedback on one area where their assessment could be improved, such as a missed vulnerability or an impractical remediation recommendation.
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their approach to the area identified for improvement, observing how they incorporate feedback and adapt their thinking.

Activity #2: Security Architecture Design Challenge

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design a secure architecture for a new system or application. It evaluates their knowledge of security principles, technologies, and frameworks, as well as their ability to translate business requirements into technical security controls.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a new business initiative requiring a secure architecture design (e.g., cloud migration, new customer-facing application, IoT implementation).
• Include specific business requirements, constraints (budget, timeline, legacy systems), and compliance considerations.
• Provide a template or whiteboard for the candidate to create their architecture diagram.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for the candidate to develop their design.
• Prepare questions that probe the candidate's reasoning behind specific design choices.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the business scenario and requirements provided.
• Design a security architecture that addresses the business needs while implementing appropriate security controls.
• Create a diagram illustrating your proposed architecture, clearly identifying security components and controls.
• Document your security design principles and how they address potential threats.
• Explain how your design complies with relevant regulatory requirements and security standards.
• Be prepared to discuss trade-offs between security, usability, and cost in your design decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one innovative or particularly effective aspect of the candidate's security architecture design.
• Identify one area where the design could be strengthened or where a security consideration was overlooked.
• Ask the candidate to revise that specific portion of their design based on your feedback, observing how they incorporate new perspectives and adapt their approach.

Activity #3: Security Incident Response Simulation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to respond to security incidents, a critical skill for Security Architects who must understand how their designs perform under attack. It assesses analytical thinking, prioritization skills, and the ability to communicate effectively during high-pressure situations.

Directions for the Company:

• Develop a detailed scenario of a security incident (e.g., ransomware attack, data breach, insider threat) with a timeline of events and available evidence.
• Create supporting materials such as log excerpts, alerts, or system status reports that provide clues about the nature and scope of the incident.
• Prepare a role-play scenario where the interviewer acts as a senior executive seeking information about the incident.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to analyze the information and prepare their response.
• Consider recording the session (with permission) to evaluate communication under pressure.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the security incident scenario and supporting materials provided.
• Analyze the available information to determine the likely cause, scope, and impact of the security incident.
• Develop an immediate response plan that includes containment strategies, investigation steps, and communication recommendations.
• Identify potential architectural or control improvements that might have prevented the incident.
• Prepare to brief a senior executive (role-played by the interviewer) on the situation, including what is known, what remains uncertain, immediate actions being taken, and next steps.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of the candidate's incident response approach, such as their analytical process, containment strategy, or communication clarity.
• Offer constructive feedback on one area where their response could be improved, such as missing a critical containment step or overlooking a key stakeholder in communications.
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their approach to the identified area, observing how they incorporate feedback and adjust their thinking under pressure.

Activity #4: Security Requirements and Controls Mapping

This exercise assesses a candidate's knowledge of security frameworks and their ability to translate compliance requirements into practical security controls. It evaluates both technical expertise and the ability to communicate complex security concepts to non-technical stakeholders.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario involving a specific compliance requirement (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) that the organization needs to address.
• Include business context about the systems and data involved.
• Provide a template for mapping requirements to controls and implementation recommendations.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the exercise.
• Prepare questions about how the candidate would explain these requirements to development teams.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the compliance scenario and business context provided.
• Identify the key security requirements from the relevant compliance standard that apply to this scenario.
• Map these requirements to specific security controls and technologies that would satisfy the compliance needs.
• Develop implementation recommendations that balance security requirements with practical considerations.
• Prepare a brief explanation of these requirements and controls that would be understandable to a non-technical audience, such as product managers or developers.
• Be ready to discuss how you would monitor and verify compliance with these requirements over time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of the candidate's approach, such as their thorough understanding of the compliance requirements or their practical implementation recommendations.
• Offer constructive feedback on one area where their mapping could be improved, such as overlooking a requirement or recommending controls that might be difficult to implement in the given context.
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach to the identified area based on your feedback, observing how they incorporate new information and adapt their recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for each work sample exercise?

Most of these exercises require 45-90 minutes for candidates to complete, plus additional time for presentation and feedback. Consider spreading them across different interview stages rather than attempting multiple exercises in a single session. For remote candidates, you might provide the scenario in advance and focus the interview on their presentation and discussion.

Should we use real company systems in these exercises?

No, always use fictional scenarios that resemble your environment but don't expose actual security vulnerabilities or sensitive information. This protects your organization while still providing a realistic assessment context.

How can we evaluate candidates consistently across these exercises?

Develop a standardized rubric for each exercise that maps to the key competencies required for the role. Have multiple evaluators use the same criteria, and conduct a calibration session with your interview team before beginning the hiring process to ensure everyone understands how to apply the rubric consistently.

What if a candidate approaches a problem differently than we expected?

This is actually valuable information! Security Architects often need to think creatively. Evaluate whether their approach is sound and addresses the core security concerns, even if it differs from your expected solution. Their unique perspective might highlight blind spots in your current thinking.

How should we accommodate candidates with different experience levels?

You can adjust expectations based on seniority, but the fundamental exercises remain valuable. For more junior candidates, you might provide additional context or focus more on their reasoning process rather than expecting comprehensive solutions. For senior candidates, you might introduce additional constraints or complexities to the scenarios.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all of these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using screen sharing, collaborative diagramming tools, and video conferencing. For design exercises, consider providing templates in tools like Lucidchart, Draw.io, or Microsoft Visio that candidates can access during the interview.

In conclusion, incorporating these work sample exercises into your Security Architect hiring process will provide deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional interviews alone. By observing how candidates approach realistic security challenges, you'll be better equipped to identify individuals who can design and implement the robust security architectures your organization needs to protect its critical assets.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI-powered tools for creating customized job descriptions, generating targeted interview questions, and developing comprehensive interview guides. You can also find more information about Security Architect roles and responsibilities at our Security Architect job description page.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account here